Full Text
Magnetic Spectrum of β-Rays Excited by γ-Rays
C. D. Ellis. The Magnetic Spektrum of the β-rays excited by γ-rays. Proceedings of the Royal Society. 99, p. 261, 1921.
We still know too little about γ-rays. It is known that γ-rays are similar to X-rays, but have an even shorter wavelength, of the order of \(10^{-10}\)–\(10^{-11}\) cm. But we know neither the exact wavelength, nor the mechanism of excitation, nor the connection of γ-rays with the β-rays emitted by various radioactive substances. There is Rutherford’s theory, according to which the primary event is the ejection of an electron from the nucleus; then this electron excites a γ-ray; the latter, acting on the electronic atmosphere of the atom, tears out one of the atom’s electrons, and these electrons ejected by the atom are what we perceive as β-rays. The very mechanism of the generation of γ-rays, as will be seen below, is not at all clear to us. By analogy with X-rays one might suppose that γ-rays are produced by the braking of electrons ejected from the nucleus by the substance of the radioactive element. Then one would have to expect a spectrum of γ-rays and, in addition, characteristic radiation, which in fact is not the case. Ellis studies a kind of photoelectric effect in γ-rays and, by his investigation, resolves the problems mentioned above.
The γ-rays of Ra B pass through thin layers of metals (W, Pt, Pb, Ur, and Ba). The β-rays produced are deflected by a strong magnetic field and are recorded on a photographic plate in the form of separate lines corresponding to one or another
energy of $\beta$-rays. Knowing the value $Hs$, where $H$ is the intensity of the magnetic field and $s$ is the radius of the circular trajectory of the $\beta$-ray, one can determine for each line the corresponding energy of the $\beta$-ray. In the following table are given data expressing the energy of the $\beta$-rays in volts, corresponding to the three most intense lines in the $\beta$-spectra for a number of elements:
| W (74) | Pt (78) | Pb (82) | Ur (92) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy in volts. $10^{-3}$ | 1,66 | 1,58 | 1,49 | 1,22 |
| Energy in volts. $10^{-3}$ | 2,20 | 2,12 | 2,03 | 1,74 |
| Energy in volts. $10^{-3}$ | 2,76 | 2,69 | 2,60 | 2,31 |
The difference in energy for W as against the electron energy for Pt is $0{,}08 \cdot 10^5$ volts for all three lines.
According to Rutherford’s theory it follows that the energy of the $\beta$-ray equals the energy of the $\gamma$-ray minus the energy required to transfer an electron from one of the inner orbits to infinity.
\[ W = W_n - W_a, \tag{1} \]
where $W_a$ is an energy characteristic of one or another element.
The energy required to transfer an electron from the $K$ ring to infinity can be found from the edges of the absorption bands of X-rays in one or another element. The difference of these energies for W and Pt is precisely 8000 volts. The data for these energies are indicated in the following table:
| Element | Energy |
|---|---|
| W | $0{,}693 \cdot 10^5$ volts |
| Pt | $0{,}782$ „ „ |
| Pb | $0{,}891$ „ „ |
| Ur | $1{,}178$ „ „ |
From equation (1) it is evident that the energy of the $\gamma$-rays $W_n$ will be found if to the energy of the $\beta$-ray one adds the energy $W_a$; then we obtain Table III, expressing the energy of the $\beta$-ray corresponding to a definite line in Ellis’s $\beta$-spectra.
| W | Pt | Pb | Ur |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,35 | 2,36 | 2,38 | 2,40 |
| 2,89 | 2,91 | 2,92 | 2,92 |
| 3,46 | 3,46 | 3,49 | 3,48 |
These numbers show that Ra B emits three groups of $\gamma$-rays, and that the $\beta$-rays observed from the elements studied are electrons ejected by the $\beta$-rays from the $K$ ring.
A more detailed study of the magnetic spectrum of $\beta$-rays from Ra B showed that Ra B emits groups of $\gamma$-rays whose energy in volts and wavelengths will be:
| Energy | Wavelength |
|---|---|
| $4000 \cdot 10^3$ volts | $0{,}0308 \cdot 10^8$ cm |
| 3639 „ | 0,0339 „ |
| 3492 „ | 0,0354 „ |
| 2918 „ | 0,0423 „ |
| 2529 „ | 0,0488 „ |
| 2355 „ | 0,0519 „ |
Ellis’s experiments only confirm the above-mentioned theory of Rutherford. The existence of definite groups of $\gamma$-rays makes unclear the mechanism of excitation of $\gamma$-rays, apparently very different from the mechanism of excitation of X-rays.
N. Selyakov.