Reaction Rate of Certain Esters of Mineral Acids with Pyridine

B. V. Tronov, L. N. D’yakonova-Shul’ts and A. N. Kochneva
Submitted 1931 | SovietRxiv: ru-193101.07576 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

This study examines whether cleavage of ester oxygen bonds by pyridine can be used to compare the mobility of hydrocarbon radicals and acid residues in esters, focusing on esters of strong mineral acids after less reactive organic and weak inorganic esters proved unsuitable. The authors followed the formation of insoluble pyridinium salts from methyl, ethyl, and isoamyl nitrates, dimethyl and diethyl sulfates, and ethyl benzenesulfonate, in neat mixtures and in several solvents, using approximate volumetric or gravimetric measurements rather than kinetic constants. The results indicate a qualitative activity order of acid residues toward pyridine of chloride below nitrate below bromide below iodide below benzenesulfonate below sulfate. Sulfate esters, especially dimethyl sulfate, reacted far more rapidly than expected, a behavior the authors note is not explained by acid strength and may relate to their pronounced toxicity.

Full Text

B. V. Tronov, L. N. D’yakonova-Shul’ts and A. N. Kochneva

Reaction Rate of Certain Esters of Mineral Acids with Pyridine.

From the Laboratory of Organic Chemistry of the Siberian Technological Institute.

Measurement of the rate of cleavage of esters by tertiary amines is, in principle, one of the best methods for determining the strength of the bond of organic radicals with oxygen. With other methods one usually has to deal with complex processes proceeding in several stages, and the overall rate of the process depends on each of these stages. For example, the reaction, very convenient from the experimental point of view, of splitting off a hydrocarbon radical by the action of a hydrogen halide acid in fact represents a combination of at least two, and probably a larger number of, reactions.

Hantzsch¹ writes

\[ \begin{gathered} \mathrm{HX} \qquad\qquad \mathrm{X}\quad \mathrm{H}\\ \phantom{\mathrm{HX}}\ \vdots \qquad\qquad\ \ \backslash/\\ \mathrm{R-O-R + HX \longrightarrow R-O-R \longrightarrow R-OR \longrightarrow ROH + RX} \end{gathered} \]

This, of course, greatly hinders the use of experimental results for theoretical conclusions.

With tertiary amines a simple cleavage is quite probable:

\[ \begin{gathered} \mathrm{R}\\ \vdots\\ \mathrm{R-O-R + R'_3N \longrightarrow R-O-NR'_3} \end{gathered} \]

or

\[ \begin{gathered} \mathrm{X-O-R + R'_3N \longrightarrow X-O-N\equiv R'_3}\\ \vdots\\ \mathrm{R} \end{gathered} \]

and it is difficult to imagine an intermediate reaction. It would therefore be very interesting to investigate, with respect to the rate of cleavage by amines, as large a number of esters as possible, both simple and complex, with varied alcohol and acid radicals.

However, a number of obstacles hinder broad application of the method. First of all, amines are too weak a reagent to break the bond of a radical with oxygen in many esters. Among simple esters, only those in which one radical is strongly electronegative react at an appreciable rate (in this respect they approach complex esters).

¹ A. Hantzsch, Ber. 58, 612–41 (1925).

There is a reference in the literature¹) to esters of trinitrophenol. Trinitroanisole gives with pyridine a compound of the composition:

\[ \mathrm{CH_3OC_6H_2(NO_2)_3 + C_5H_5N} \]

Of the several structural formulas possible for this substance, one represents it as the product of addition of the trinitrophenyl methyl ether to pyridine, with rupture of the bond between methyl and oxygen:

\[ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{C_5H_5N - O - C_6H_2(NO_2)_3}\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \vert\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathrm{CH_3} \end{array} \]

The electronegative character of the acid radical makes compound esters more active also with respect to tertiary amines. Thus methyl acetate, when heated with trimethylamine, gives acetic acid tetramethylammonium²):

\[ \begin{array}{c} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathrm{O}\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \Vert\\ \mathrm{CH_3 - C - OCH_3 + N(CH_3)_3 \longrightarrow CH_3 - C - ON(CH_3)_4}\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \Vert\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathrm{O} \end{array} \]

However, for comparing the strength of the bonds of various hydrocarbon radicals with oxygen by determining the rate of cleavage of these radicals under the action of amines, esters of organic acids prove to be of little use. We carried out experiments with the following substances:

\[ \begin{array}{ll} 1)\ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{O}\\ \Vert\\ \mathrm{C - OC_2H_5}\\ \vert\\ \mathrm{C - OC_2H_5}\\ \Vert\\ \mathrm{O} \end{array} & 3)\ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_2 - C - N}\\ \vert\!=\!\mathrm{O}\\ \mathrm{C - OC_2H_5} \end{array} \\[3em] 2)\ \mathrm{CH_3 - C - CH_2 - COOC_2H_5} & 4)\ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CHOH - COOC_2H_5}\\ \mathrm{CHOH - COOC_2H_5} \end{array} \\[-0.5em] \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \vert & \\[-0.2em] \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \mathrm{O} & \\[2em] & 5)\ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{CH_2 - COOC_2H_5}\\ \vert\\ \mathrm{COH - CH_2 - COOC_2H_5}\\ \vert\\ \mathrm{COOC_2H_5} \end{array} \end{array} \]

These compounds were mixed in equimolecular quantities with pyridine and left at ordinary temperature in sealed test tubes.

But even after standing for 3–4 years, formation of salts could not be established. Thus esters even of comparatively strong organic acids are too little active with respect to amines³) (of course, tertiary ones, since primary and secondary amines will react differently). The same was found for weak inorganic acids.

¹) Michele Giua, C. 1921 III 1271.
²) R. Willstätter, W. Kahn, 35, 2757 (1902).
³) With appreciable speed they react only on heating. (R. Willstätter, W. Kahn, Ber. (1902) 35. 2757.

Isoamyl nitrite did not react noticeably over 3 years. Methyl, ethyl, and isoamyl esters of boric acid did not give the corresponding salts even upon many hours of heating with pyridine in sealed tubes to 200–240°.

All this compelled us to limit the present work to the study of esters only of the strongest, almost exclusively mineral, acids. The following were taken: methyl nitrate, ethyl nitrate, isoamyl nitrate, dimethyl sulfate, diethyl sulfate, and the ethyl ester of benzenesulfonic acid. Pyridine was taken as the cleaving reagent.

It was necessary to study separately the products of the reactions1, since in the literature on this question there were only very incomplete and partly contradictory data. For sulfates, salts with the methyl ester of nicotinic acid were known2. With nitrates, some authors also obtained ammonium salts, e.g., nitric-acid benzylquinolinium from quinoline and benzyl nitrate3; others4 found that, in the interaction of esters of nitric acid and amines, decomposition of the ester occurs into nitrous acid and an aldehyde or ketone; thus reacted, for example, nitrates of glycerin and cellulose. The amine here is a catalyst. The contradiction must apparently be explained by the difference in the alcohol radicals. Polyatomic alcohols are in general oxidized appreciably more rapidly.

In the work of L. N. Dyakonova-Shulyats and A. S. Klokova it was established that the methyl, ethyl, isobutyl, and isoamyl esters of nitric acid with tertiary amines at ordinary temperature or on a sand bath give only ammonium salts, and thus the reaction can indeed serve to determine the strength of the bond of these hydrocarbon radicals with oxygen.

Greater difficulties subsequently arose in the actual measurement of the reaction rate.

For the anions \(\mathrm{NO_3'}\), \(\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_3'}\), and \(\mathrm{R--OSO_3'}\)5 exact quantitative determination is considerably more difficult than for halides. Therefore, in the present work, which is preliminary in character, we limited ourselves only to an approximate determination of the course of the reaction. A mixture of pyridine with the ester under study, sometimes with addition of a solvent, was poured into a graduated test tube or cylinder. In the case of slowly reacting substances the test tube was sealed.

The course of the reaction was followed by the volume of the precipitated product (all oils are heavier than the original mixture). Observation was aided by the negligible solubility of the salt formed, but some of the pyridine, of course, could be entrained into the lower layer. In some cases the separated oil was weighed. The experiments were carried out at ordinary temperature (16–20°). Sometimes it was necessary to cool the test tube with water. Compounds reacting slowly were investigated without solvent; rapidly reacting ones, chiefly in benzene solution, at

of average activity, experiments were also carried out both in solution and without solvent. The concentration of the solutions was for the most part 1 gram-molecule per liter, sometimes 2.6 gram-molecules per liter; 0.85 gram-molecule and 0.8 gram-molecule per liter. Pyridine and ester were always taken in equimolecular proportions.

In the following tables are given the results of individual experiments and the figures for the average relative activity of the esters, with half the reaction rate for diethyl sulfate taken as unity; it was studied under the most varied conditions, and since in \((C_2H_5)_2SO_4\) both radicals are split off with equal ease, for comparison the figures obtained have to be divided by two. In view of the low accuracy of the determinations, constants were not calculated; instead, the comparison of rates was made according to the time intervals during which the same percentage of substance reacts.

In the summary tables there are also given figures expressing the activity of haloid compounds with the same radicals1.

EXPERIMENTS WITHOUT SOLVENT:

Ester Measurement 75 d. 151 d. 225 d. 254 d. 326 d. 365 d.
\(C_2H_5ONO_2\) Duration of experiment 75 d. 151 d. 225 d. 254 d. 326 d. 365 d.
\(C_2H_5ONO_2\) % of substance reacted 19 33 52 61 67 78
\(C_2H_5ONO_2\) Duration of experiment 438 d. 557 d. 652 d. 938 d.
\(C_2H_5ONO_2\) % of substance reacted 80 86 89 98
Ester Measurement 100 d. 180 d. 240 d. 350 d. 480 d. 635 d. 830 d.
\(iC_5H_{11}ONO_2\) Duration of experiment 100 d. 180 d. 240 d. 350 d. 480 d. 635 d. 830 d.
\(iC_5H_{11}ONO_2\) % of substance reacted 10 15 20 30 40 50 60
Ester Measurement 10 min. 18 min. 28 min. 43 min. 60 min. 90 min.
\((C_2H_5)_2SO_4\) Duration of experiment 10 min. 18 min. 28 min. 43 min. 60 min. 90 min.
\((C_2H_5)_2SO_4\) % of substance reacted 30.2 42.8 51.8 65.1 71.3 80.5
\((C_2H_5)_2SO_4\) Duration of experiment 130 min. 160 min. 300 min. 360 min. 430 min. 730 min.
\((C_2H_5)_2SO_4\) % of substance reacted 84.0 89.5 92.4 96.5 98.3 100

EXPERIMENTS IN BENZENE SOLUTION

Substance Concentration Measurement 1 d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 d 6 d 7 d 8 d
$\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ 2.6 N Duration of experiment 1 d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 d 6 d 7 d 8 d
$\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ 2.6 N % of substance reacted 1.64 2.87 4.51 6.47 8.61 10.7 13.9 16.1
$\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ 2.6 N Duration of experiment 9 d 10 d 11 d 12 d 13 d 14 d 15 d 17 d
$\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ 2.6 N % of substance reacted 18.0 21.3 23.8 25.8 27.65 28.7 30.3 33.6
$\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ 2.6 N Duration of experiment 20 d 22 d 27 d 30 d 35 d 40 d 48 d 55 d
$\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ 2.6 N % of substance reacted 38.5 42.6 46.4 51.8 55.7 60.0 67.2 64.7
$\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ 2.6 N Duration of experiment 60 d 75 d 84 d 94 d 100 d 142 d 295 d
$\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ 2.6 N % of substance reacted 72.1 76.2 81.3 85.0 89.1 98.5 99.2
Substance Concentration Measurement 15 d 30 d
$\mathrm{C_2H_5ONO_2}$ 2.6 N Duration of experiment 15 d 30 d
$\mathrm{C_2H_5ONO_2}$ 2.6 N % of substance reacted [[unclear: number]] [[unclear: number]]
Substance Concentration Measurement [[unclear: duration]]
$\mathrm{C_2H_5ONO_2}$ 1 N Duration of experiment [[unclear: duration]]
$\mathrm{C_2H_5ONO_2}$ 1 N % of substance reacted [[unclear: number]]
Substance Concentration Measurement 7 min 9 min 10 min 11 min 12 min 15 min 20 min 25 min
$(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ 1 gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 7 min 9 min 10 min 11 min 12 min 15 min 20 min 25 min
$(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ 1 gram-mol/liter % of substance reacted 18 21 27 30 33.2 36 42 48
$(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ 1 gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 30 min 35 min 40 min 45 min 50 min 55 min 65 min 75 min
$(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ 1 gram-mol/liter % of substance reacted 54 57 60 63 66 66 69 72
$(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ 1 gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 85 min 95 min 105 min 125 min 145 min 20 h
$(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ 1 gram-mol/liter % of substance reacted 75 78 81 81 81 90.2
Substance and concentration Measurement 1 h 1.05 h 1.22 h 2.9 h 3.12 h
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $2.6$ gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 1 h 1.05 h 1.22 h 2.9 h 3.12 h
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $2.6$ gram-mol/liter % of reacted substance 30 36 43 60 69
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $2.6$ gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 17.7 h 23.7 h 26.7 h 42.2 h 64.7 h
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $2.6$ gram-mol/liter % of reacted substance 86 93 95 96 98
Substance and concentration Measurement 18 h 21 h 27 h 42 h 66 h 94 h 114 h 165 h
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $1$ gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 18 h 21 h 27 h 42 h 66 h 94 h 114 h 165 h
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $1$ gram-mol/liter % of reacted substance 36.1 45.5 50.0 59 73 82 86 94
Substance and concentration Measurement 26 h [[unclear: hours]] 54 h 61 h 89 h 112 h 155 h 203 h 280 h
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $0.8$ gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 26 h [[unclear: hours]] 54 h 61 h 89 h 112 h 155 h 203 h 280 h
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $0.8$ gram-mol/liter % of reacted substance 28 [[unclear: number]] 45 51 60 66 74 78 84
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $0.8$ gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 301 h 211 h 888 h 1224 h 1415 h 1832 h 1860 h 2316 h
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$, conc. $0.8$ gram-mol/liter % of reacted substance 90 93 95 96 96.5 97.5 99 99.7
Substance and concentration Measurement 2 d 3 d 5 d 7 d 10 d 11 d 17 d
$\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2O_2CH_3}$, conc. $0.85$ gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 2 d 3 d 5 d 7 d 10 d 11 d 17 d
$\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2O_2CH_3}$, conc. $0.85$ gram-mol/liter % of reacted substance 4.5 6 12 19 28 38 42
$\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2O_2CH_3}$, conc. $0.85$ gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 19 d 23 d 26 d 33 d 38 d 42 d 52 d
$\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2O_2CH_3}$, conc. $0.85$ gram-mol/liter % of reacted substance 46 53 58 66 70.7 72 77
$\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2O_2CH_3}$, conc. $0.85$ gram-mol/liter Duration of experiment 68 d 82 d 90 d 96 d 110 d 110 d
$\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2O_2CH_3}$, conc. $0.85$ gram-mol/liter % of reacted substance 85 89 92.4 95 97 98.1

EXPERIMENTS IN m-XYLENE:

Substance 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 5.5 min 6 min 7 min 8 min
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 5.5 min 6 min 7 min 8 min
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % reacted substance 6 18 24 30 39 42 45 48 51
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 11 min 15 min 20 min 25 min 30 min 35 min 40 min 45 min 55 min
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % reacted substance 51 54 60 63 66 69 72 75 78
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 65 min 75 min 90 min 120 min 150 min 6 h 22 h
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % reacted substance 81 84 87 90 90 93 94.5

EXPERIMENTS IN CARBON TETRACHLORIDE:

Substance 5 min 5.5 min 6 min 6.5 min 7 min 8 min 9 min 10 min
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 5 min 5.5 min 6 min 6.5 min 7 min 8 min 9 min 10 min
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % reacted substance 3 18 30 36 42 48 54 57
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 11 min 12 min 15 min 20 min 25 min 30 min 40 min 70 min
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % reacted substance 60 60 66 69 72 72 75 78
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 110 min 150 min 205 min 250 min 5 h 20 h
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % reacted substance 78 81 84 87 90 98

EXPERIMENTS IN ETHYLENE CHLORIDE

Substance 3 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 6 min 7 min 8 min 10 min 12 min
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 3 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 6 min 7 min 8 min 10 min 12 min
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % reacted substance 6 12 15 18 24 36 54 66 66
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 14 min 16 min 20 min 25 min 30 min 40 min 50 min 60 min
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % reacted substance 78 81 84 87 90 96.2 96.2 96.2

EXPERIMENTS IN ETHYLIDENE CHLORIDE

Substance Quantity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 3 min. 3.5 min. 4 min. 4.5 min. 5 min. 5.5 min. 6 min. 7 min.
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % of reacted substance 6 12 18 21 27 30 36 42
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 8 min. 9 min. 10 min. 11 min. 13 min. 15 min. 17 min. 20 min.
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % of reacted substance 45 48 48 51 51 54 57 60
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 23 min. 25 min. 30 min. 35 min. 40 min. 45 min. 50 min. 60 min.
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % of reacted substance 63 66 [[unclear: value, likely 69]] 72 75 78 78 81
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 70 min. 80 min. 100 min. 120 min. 150 min. 180 min. 210 min.
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % of reacted substance 87 87 [[unclear: value]] [[unclear: value, ending in .2]] 96.2 96.2 —

EXPERIMENTS IN ISOAMYL CHLORIDE

Substance Quantity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 11 min. 13 min. 15 min. 17 min. 19 min. 21 min. 22 min. 24 min.
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % of reacted substance 6 6 9 12 12 18 21 24
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 26 min. 28 min. [[unclear: minutes]] [[unclear: minutes]] 35 min. 38 min. 40 min. 45 min.
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % of reacted substance 27 30 33 [[unclear: value]] 36 42 45 48
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 50 min. 55 min. 60 min. 70 min. 80 min. 90 min. 100 min. 110 min.
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % of reacted substance 51 57 63 66 72 75 78 81
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ Duration of experiment 120 min. 150 min. 170 min. 190 min. 220 min. 4 h 5 h
$(\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4$ % of reacted substance 84 87 90 90 96.2 96.2 96.2

Experiments in Chlorobenzene

Substance Measurement 2 min 2.5 min 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 6 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 2 min 2.5 min 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 6 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 3 12 18 24 30 42 48 51
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 7 min 8 min 9 min 11 min 14 min 17 min 22 min 27 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 51 57 60 63 66 69 75 78
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 32 min 37 min 42 min 50 min 60 min 80 min 105 min 135 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 84 84 87 90 93 96.4 96.4 96.4

Experiments in Ethyl Ether

Substance Measurement 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 6 min 7 min 8 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 6 min 7 min 8 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 21
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 9 min 10 min 11 min 13 min 15 min 17 min 19 min 21 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 24 24 27 30 33 36 39 42
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 20 min 25 min 27 min 30 min 35 min 40 min 45 min 50 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 45 48 51 51 57 63 69 72
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 55 min 65 min 75 min 85 min 110 min 170 min 230 min 24 h
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 72 75 78 81 84 84 87 90.2

Experiments in Acetophenone

Substance Measurement 2 min 2.5 min 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 5 min 6 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 2 min 2.5 min 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 5 min 6 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 3 12 18 30 36 42 48
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 7 min 8 min 9 min 10 min 11 min 12 min 13 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 57 57 66 72 78 81 84
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of the experiment 14 min 15 min 17 min 20 min 25 min 30 min 40 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 87 90 93 96.2 96.2 97.7 97.7

EXPERIMENTS IN ETHYL BENZOATE:

Substance Measurement 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 5.5 min 6 min 7 min 8 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of experiment 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 4.5 min 5 min 5.5 min 6 min 7 min 8 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 6 9 24 30 45 60 72 81 84
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of experiment 9 min 10 min 11 min 12 min 14 min 17 min 20 min 30 min 40 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 87 90 93 95 96.2 96.2 96.2 99.3 99.3

EXPERIMENTS IN ISOAMYL NITRATE:

Substance Measurement 10 min 11 min 12 min 13 min 14 min 15 min 17 min 20 min 25 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of experiment 10 min 11 min 12 min 13 min 14 min 15 min 17 min 20 min 25 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 3 5 6 9 9 12 12 12 15
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of experiment 30 min 35 min 40 min 45 min 50 min 55 min 60 min 65 min 70 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 21 24 30 36 39 42 48 54 60
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of experiment 80 min 100 min 115 min 130 min 150 min 180 min 210 min 4 h
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 65 65 72 75 81 87 90 95.8

EXPERIMENTS IN NITROBENZENE:

Substance Measurement 1 min 1.5 min 2 min 2.5 min 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 5 min 6 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of experiment 1 min 1.5 min 2 min 2.5 min 3 min 3.5 min 4 min 5 min 6 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 12 24 36 42 48 54 60 60 72
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) Duration of experiment 7 min 8 min 9 min 10 min 11 min 12 min 14 min 17 min 20 min
\((\mathrm{CH}_3)_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) % of reacted substance 75 78 81 84 87 90 93 96.9 96.9

Relative rate of reaction of various esters and halogen compounds with pyridine

Without solvent Without solvent In benzene solution1 In benzene solution1
$\mathrm{CH_3Br}$ $0.85$ $\mathrm{C_2H_5I}$ $2.4$
$\mathrm{CH_3I}$ $1.8$ $\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ $5.1\cdot 10^{-3}$
$\mathrm{C_2H_5Cl}$ $4.5\cdot 10^{-5}$ $\frac12(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ $54$
$\mathrm{C_2H_5Br}$ $1.1\cdot 10^{-2}$ $\mathrm{C_2H_5Br}$ $1.8\cdot 10^{-2}$
$\mathrm{C_2H_5I}$ $7.5\cdot 10^{-2}$ $\mathrm{C_2H_5I}$ $1.1\cdot 10^{-1}$
$\mathrm{C_2H_5ONO_2}$ $1.5\cdot 10^{-4}$ $\mathrm{C_2H_5ONO_2}$ $2.1\cdot 10^{-4}$
$\frac12(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ $1$ $\frac12(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ $1$
$i\mathrm{C_5H_{11}Cl}$ $3.5\cdot 10^{-4}$ $\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2OC_2H_5}$ $2.2\cdot 10^{-1}$
$i\mathrm{C_5H_{11}Br}$ $2.2\cdot 10^{-2}$
$i\mathrm{C_5H_{11}ONO_2}$ $5\cdot 10^{-5}$
$i\mathrm{C_5H_{11}I}$ $7.5\cdot 10^{-2}$

Relative rate of reaction of sulfates with pyridine in various solvents (conc. 1)

Solvent $(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$ $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{SO_4}$
$\mathrm{C_6H_6}$ $1$ $1$
$m$-$\mathrm{C_6H_4(CH_3)_2}$ $2.7$ $1.5$
$\mathrm{CCl_4}$ $2.4$ $1.46$
$\mathrm{CH_2Cl{-}CH_2Cl}$ $2.4$ —
$\mathrm{CHCl{-}CHCl_2}$ $2.1$ —
$i\mathrm{C_5H_{11}Cl}$ $0.45$ —
$\mathrm{C_2H_5Cl}$ $3.5$ $2.3$
$(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_2\mathrm{O}$ $0.93$ $1.2$
$\mathrm{C_6H_5COCH_3}$ $3.5$ —
$i\mathrm{C_5H_{11}ONO_2}$ $0.25$ —
$\mathrm{C_2H_5COOC_2H_5}$ [[unclear: number]] $2.5$
$\mathrm{C_2H_5NO_2}$ [[unclear: number]] —

Conclusion

We have studied too few esters to make any theoretical conclusions.

The experiments presented do not make it possible to decide definitely what type of bond cleavage—ionic or neutral—takes place in the present case. Compounds of three radicals were investigated: methyl, ethyl, and isoamyl. If the rate of reaction for ethyl esters is taken as unity, and nitro esters and sulfuric esters, as well as alkyl halides, are taken with pyridine, then the following numbers are obtained:

Rate of reaction $\mathrm{RX} + \mathrm{C_5H_5N}$
with $X =$

R Cl Br I NO $ROSO$
$\mathrm{CH_3}$ — [[unclear: number]] [[unclear: number]] $24$ $54$
$\mathrm{C_2H_5}$ $1$ $1$ $1$ $1$ $1$
$i\mathrm{C_5H_{11}}$ $0.002$ $0.2$ $1$ $0.33$ —

Measurement of the rate of action of alcoholates on halogen compounds¹) and the rate of decomposition of simple phenyl ethers²) and acetic acid esters³) by hydrogen bromide gives:

R Relative rate of reaction with CH₃ONa: KBr Relative rate of reaction with CH₃ONa: RI Relative rate of reaction with HBr: C₂H₅OR Relative rate of reaction with HBr: CH₃COOR
CH₃ 11.3 6.0 2.4 6.3
C₂H₅ 1 1 1 1
iC₃H₇ 0.088 0.24 0.59 0.32

The reaction of halogen compounds with amines is, as was indicated earlier⁴), typical of ionic bond rupture; interaction with alcoholates proceeds predominantly according to the neutral type; still more sharply is this type of decomposition expressed, as the numbers in the table show, in the decomposition of ethers by hydrogen halides.

Measurement of the rate of interaction of nitrates and sulfates with pyridine, judging by the ratios between methyl and ethyl, belongs to the ionic type, but with isoamyl esters fluctuations are observed.

The most interesting result of the work is the comparison of the mobility of various acid residues:

R t = Cl Br I NO₃ ROSO₂ C₆H₅SO₃
CH₃ according to experiment in benzene solution — 270 55 1 1.5·10⁴ —
C₂H₅ according to experiment without solvent 0.3 73 500 1 0.7·10⁴ —
C₂H₅ according to experiment in benzene solution — 84 26 1 1.4·10[[unclear: exponent]] 4.20
iC₃H₇ according to experiment without solvent 0.07 14 150 1 — —

The activity of the NO₃ group has been taken as unity.

As is seen from the numbers given here, the series of activities is as follows:

\[ \mathrm{Cl} < \mathrm{NO_3} < \mathrm{Br} < \mathrm{I} < \mathrm{C_6H_5SO_3} < \mathrm{ROSO_2} \]

In rate of reaction with pyridine, nitrates somewhat exceed chlorides, but are strongly inferior to bromides.

The group C₆H₅SO₃ is close in its mobility to I.

Especially outstanding are the sulfates, in which rupture of the radical bond (the first one) with oxygen occurs tens of times more readily than even in iodide compounds. This is not in any connection with the dissociation constants of the corresponding acids. This extraordinary chemical activity must evidently also explain the unexpectedly strong toxicity of dimethyl sulfate. From the theoretical side, the activity of sulfates for the time being remains incomprehensible.

¹) M. Conrad, C. Brückner, Ztschr. phys. Chem. 4, 631—637 (1889). E. V. Tronov and L. G. Boldyreva. Work not yet published.
²) E. V. Tronov and L. V. Ladygina. The work is being printed in Ber. d. Deutsch. Chem. Ges.
³) E. V. Tronov and N. K. Subbotina. The work is being printed there.
⁴) E. V. Tronov, Zh. R. Kh. O. 58, 1278 (1926).

  1. The greater part of the compounds were compared at a concentration of $1$ g-mol; $\mathrm{CH_3ONO_2}$ and $\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2OC_2H_5}$ were taken at other concentrations and compared with a solution of ethyl sulfate of the same concentrations. ↩↩↩↩

  2. R. Wolffenstein, Ch. Al. 17, 1247. ↩

  3. Ya. I. Mikhailenko and N. A. Kudryasheva, “Reports on scientific and technical work in the republic,” 6, 60. ↩

  4. A. Angeli, C. 1921, 4, 762. ↩

  5. Sulfates, even the most active dimethyl sulfate, readily give up only one hydrocarbon residue, so that under ordinary conditions the reaction does not proceed as far as formation of the sulfuric-acid ammonium salt. ↩

Submission history

Reaction Rate of Certain Esters of Mineral Acids with Pyridine