On Sets of Points Where the Derivative Is Respectively Finite and Infinite
Unknown
Submitted 1957-01-01 | SovietRxiv: ru-195701.37588 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

This note studies the relation between points where a real function has an infinite derivative and points where its derivative is finite. It proves that, for any measure zero set of type F sigma delta contained in a G delta set, there exists a continuous increasing function whose derivative is positive infinity on the former set, whose lower derived number is finite outside it, and whose ordinary derivative exists and is finite outside the latter set. The construction uses nested closed and open set decompositions, density properties, asymptotically continuous auxiliary functions, and integration of a carefully bounded summable function.

Full Text

V. M. Tsodyks

ON SETS OF POINTS WHERE THE DERIVATIVE IS RESPECTIVELY FINITE AND INFINITE

(Presented by Academician S. L. Sobolev, 15 I 1957)

In the works of N. N. Luzin (¹), Z. S. Zagorskii (²), and A. L. Brudno (³) it was shown that the set of points at which an infinite derivative exists is an \(F_{\sigma\delta}\) set of measure zero, while the set of points at which at least one derived number of a function of a real variable tends to infinity is a \(G_\delta\) set.

E. M. Landis (⁴), for an arbitrary set \(E\) of type \(F_{\sigma\delta}\) and of measure zero, constructed a continuous function \(F(x)\) such that \(F'(x)=+\infty\) for \(x\in E\), \(\underline F(x)<+\infty\) for \(x\notin E\) (by \(\underline F\) is denoted the lower derived number of the function \(F\)).

In the present note we briefly state a theorem giving a partial answer to the question of the relation between the set of points where the derivative is equal to infinity and the set of points where the derivative is finite (²).

Theorem. Let \(E\) be a set of type \(F_{\sigma\delta}\) of measure zero and \(N\) a set of type \(G_\delta\), lying on the axis \(OX\), with \(N\supset E\). Then there exists a continuous increasing function \(F(x)\) such that \(F'(x)=+\infty\) for \(x\in E\), \(\underline F(x)<+\infty\) for \(x\notin E\), and for \(x\in CN\), \(F'(x)\) exists and is finite.

Proof.

  1. Let
    \[ E=\prod_{n=1}^{\infty} E_n \quad\text{and}\quad E_n=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} E_{nk}, \]
    where the \(E_{nk}\) are closed sets.

Let
\[ N=\prod_{n=1}^{\infty} G_n, \]
where the \(G_n\) are open sets such that \(G_n\supset E\).

We may assume that
\[ \operatorname{mes} G_n<\frac1{2^n},\qquad G_n\supset G_{n+1},\qquad E_n\subset G_n,\qquad E_{nk}\subset E_{n,k+1}, \]
\[ E_{n+1,k}\subset E_{nk}. \]

Let a summable function
\[ u(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} u_n(x) \]
be given, where \(u_n(x)=1\) for \(x\in G_n\), and \(u_n(x)=0\) for \(x\notin G_n\).

Place in \(E_n\) the set
\[ e_n=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} e_{nk}, \]
where the \(e_{nk}\) are sets simultaneously of type \(F_\sigma\) and \(G_\delta\), possessing the following properties:

1) \(e_{n,k+1}\supset e_{nk}\), \(E\cdot E_{nk}\subset e_{nk}\subset E_{nk}\).

2) For every integer \(k\ge 2\) there exist six open sets \(g^*_{1k}\), \(g^{*1}_{nk}\), \(g^{*2}_{nk}\), and \(g_{nk}\), \(g^1_{nk}\), \(g^2_{nk}\), and for \(k=1\) three open sets \(g_{n1}\), \(g^1_{n1}\), \(g^2_{n1}\) such that:

a)
\[ G_n=g_{n1}\supset g^1_{n1}\supset g^2_{n1}\supset e_{n1}; \]

b) if \(x_0\in g_{n1}\), then for every \(h\)
\[ \frac{\operatorname{mes}(g^1_{n1})^h}{h}\le \frac1{2^n}, \]
where
\[ (g^1_{n1})^h = g^1_{n1}\cdot [x_0,x_0+h] \]
(or \(g^1_{n1}\cdot [x_0+h,x_0]\), if \(h<0\));

c) \(g_{n,k-1}^{2}-e_{n,k-1}=g_{nk}^{*}\supset g_{nk}^{*1}\supset g_{nk}^{*2}\supset g_{nk}\supset g_{nk}^{1}\supset g_{nk}^{2}\supset (e_{nk}-e_{n,k-1})\), where \(k\geqslant 2\); \(g_{nk}\subset G_k\);

d) the points \(Cg_{nk}\) are points of density for \(Cg_{nk}^{1}\); the points \(Cg_{nk}^{1}\) are points of density for \(Cg_{nk}^{2}\); the points \(Cg_{nk}^{*}\) are points of density for \(Cg_{nk}^{*1}\); the points \(Cg_{nk}^{*1}\) are points of density for \(Cg_{nk}^{*2}\);

e) if \(x_0\notin g_{nk}^{*2}\), then for any \(h\)

\[ \frac{\int_{g_{nk}^{h}} u(\xi)\,d\xi}{h}<\frac{1}{2^k}, \]

where \(g_{nk}^{h}=g_{nk}\cdot [x_0,x_0+h]\) (or \(g_{nk}\cdot [x_0+h,x_0]\), if \(h<0\)).

Obviously, \(E\subset e_n\subset E_n\), \(\prod_{k=1}^{\infty} g_{nk}\subset N\), and the points of the set \(e_n\) are points of density for the set

\[ D_n=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\bigl(g_{nk}^{2}-g_{n,k+1}^{*1}\bigr). \]

Let \(e_{n1}=\prod_{l=1}^{\infty} G_{n1}^{(l)}\), where \(G_{n1}^{(l)}\) is an open set, \(G_{n1}^{(l+1)}\subset G_{n1}^{(l)}\subset g_{n1}\), \(\overline{G}_{n1}^{(l+1)}\subset G_{n1}^{(l)}+E_{n1}\).

Let \(e_{nk}-e_{n,k-1}=\prod_{l=1}^{\infty} G_{nk}^{(l)}\) \((k=2,3,\ldots)\), where \(G_{nk}^{(l)}\) is an open set, \(G_{nk}^{(l+1)}\subset G_{nk}^{(l)}\subset g_{nk}\), \(\overline{G}_{nk}^{(l+1)}\subset G_{nk}^{(l)}+E_{nk}\).

Put \(G_n^{(l)}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} G_{nk}^{(l)}\) (obviously, \(e_n\subset G_n^{(l)}\subset G_n\)) and construct, for each natural \(l\), open sets \(A_{nl}, A_{nl}^{1}, A_{nl}^{2}\) such that:

a) \(G_{n}^{(1)}\cdot G_1=A_{n1}\supset A_{n1}^{1}\supset A_{n1}^{2}\supset E\);

b) \(A_{n,l-1}^{2}\cdot G_n^{(l)}\cdot G_l=A_{nl}\supset A_{nl}^{1}\supset A_{nl}^{2}\supset E\), where \(l\geqslant 2\);

c) the points \(CA_{nl}\) are points of density for \(CA_{nl}^{1}\); the points \(CA_{nl}^{1}\) are points of density for \(CA_{nl}^{2}\).

  1. We now construct auxiliary functions.

For each natural \(n\) we construct asymptotically continuous functions \({}^{(5,6)}\)

1) \(\theta_{nk}(x)\) \((k=1,2,\ldots)\), where \(\theta_{nk}(x)=0\) for \(x\in Cg_{nk}^{1}\); \(\theta_{nk}(x)=1\) for \(x\in g_{nk}^{2}\); \(0\leqslant \theta_{nk}(x)\leqslant 1\) for the remaining points.

2) \(\theta_{n,k+1}^{*}(x)\) \((k=1,2,\ldots)\), where \(\theta_{n,k+1}^{*}(x)=0\) for \(x\in Cg_{n,k+1}^{*1}\); \(\theta_{n,k+1}^{*}(x)=1\) for \(x\in g_{n,k+1}^{*2}\); \(0\leqslant \theta_{n,k+1}^{*}(x)\leqslant 1\) for the remaining points.

3) \(v_{nl}(x)\) \((l=1,2,\ldots)\), where \(v_{nl}(x)=0\) for \(x\in CA_{nl}^{1}\); \(v_{nl}(x)=1\) for \(x\in A_{nl}^{2}\); \(0\leqslant v_{nl}(x)\leqslant 1\) for the remaining points.

Put

\[ \theta_n(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\bigl(\theta_{nk}(x)-\theta_{n,k+1}^{*}(x)\bigr);\qquad w_{nl}(x)=\min[\theta_n(x),v_{nl}(x)]. \]

We construct a summable function

\[ w_n(x)=\sum_{l=1}^{\infty} w_{nl}(x). \]

At the points \(CN\) the functions \(\theta_n(x), w_{nl}(x), w_n(x)\) are asymptotically continuous; for \(x\in A_{nl}^{2}\cdot D_n\), \(w_n(x)\geqslant l\).

Let, further,

\[ W_n(x)=\int_0^x w_n(\xi)\,d\xi. \]

Then for \(x\notin E_n\) we have \(0\leq W_n(x)<+\infty\).

  1. We proceed to the construction of the desired function. Put
    \[ w_n^*(x)=\min_{m\le n} w_m(x);\qquad w_n^{**}(x)=\max [0, w_n^*(x)-(n-1)]. \]

Let
\[ f_n(x)=\min [1,w_n^{**}(x)]. \]
At points of \(CN\) the functions \(f_n(x)\) are asymptotically continuous; \(f_n(x)\le u_n(x)\); if \(x_0\in E\), then \(x_0\) is a point of density of the set on which \(f_n(x)=1\).

Now put
\[ f(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_n(x),\qquad F(x)=\int_0^x f(\xi)\,d\xi. \]
Observe that
\[ f(x)<w_n^*(x)+n,\qquad F(x)\le W_n(x)+n. \]

The increasing function \(F(x)\), absolutely continuous on every interval of the \(OX\)-axis, satisfies the conditions of the theorem:

I. If \(x_0\in E\), then \(F'(x_0)=+\infty\).

II. If \(x^*\notin E\), then \(\overline{F}(x^*)<+\infty\).

III. If \(x\in CN\), then \(F'(x)\) exists and is finite.

Velikie Luki State
Pedagogical Institute

Received
2 I 1957

CITED LITERATURE

¹ N. N. Luzin, Collected Works, 1, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1953, pp. 5–24. ² Z. S. Zagorskii, Mat. sbornik, 9(51), 3, 487 (1941). ³ A. L. Brudno, Mat. sbornik, 13(55), 1, 119 (1943). ⁴ E. M. Landis, DAN, 107, No. 2 (1956). ⁵ G. P. Tolstov, Mat. sbornik, 8(50), 1, 149 (1940). ⁶ V. S. Bogomolova, Mat. sbornik, 32, 1, 152 (1924).

Submission history

On Sets of Points Where the Derivative Is Respectively Finite and Infinite