Kinetics of Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Isopropyl Alcohol in the Presence of Period IV Transition Metals
Academician A. A. BALANDIN and P. TETENI
Submitted 1957-01-01 | SovietRxiv: ru-195701.38358 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

The study examines the kinetics of isopropyl alcohol dehydrogenation to acetone over precipitated metallic iron, cobalt, and nickel catalysts in a flow apparatus. Relative adsorption coefficients for acetone and hydrogen were determined by adding reaction products to the feed and applying a kinetic adsorption method, then used to calculate rate constants from a general equation for monomolecular catalytic reactions. The reaction was found to proceed selectively to acetone and hydrogen under the studied conditions, with Arrhenius behavior of the calculated rate constants. The reported activation energies decrease from iron to cobalt to nickel, and the catalytic activity increases with atomic number among these fourth-period transition metals.

Full Text

CHEMISTRY

Academician A. A. BALANDIN and P. TETENI

KINETICS OF THE CATALYTIC DEHYDROGENATION OF ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL IN THE PRESENCE OF TRANSITION METALS OF THE FOURTH PERIOD

The kinetics of the dehydrogenation of alcohols over catalysts—iron, cobalt, and nickel—has been little studied. There are only a few works with a nickel catalyst deposited on a support, in a flow system \((^{1,2})\), and without a support—in a static system \((^3)\). Meanwhile, this reaction can serve as a model in the study of the above-mentioned catalysts, which are extremely widespread in practice.

In the present work we investigated the kinetics of the dehydrogenation of isopropyl alcohol over metallic iron, cobalt, and nickel obtained by precipitation. The iron catalyst was obtained by precipitating iron oxalate* with a 50% solution of oxalic acid from a 50% solution of ferrous sulfate. The precipitate was washed with distilled water until the wash waters gave a negative reaction for the sulfate ion and was decomposed in a stream of electrolytic hydrogen at \(400^\circ\) for 6 hours. The cobalt and nickel catalysts were prepared by precipitating the corresponding hydroxides with ammonia from a 20% solution of the corresponding nitrate salt. The precipitate was washed with distilled water until the wash waters gave a negative reaction for \(\mathrm{NO_3}\). The cobalt and nickel hydroxides were decomposed in a stream of air at \(400^\circ\), and the oxides obtained were reduced with electrolytic hydrogen at 200, 250, 300, and \(350^\circ\) for 3 hours at each temperature. Between experiments the catalyst was regenerated with hydrogen for 45–60 min. The isopropyl alcohol and acetone used in the investigation had physical constants coinciding with literature data. The experiments were carried out in an ordinary flow apparatus \((^4)\). It was established that the catalysts studied, in the temperature interval examined (for iron and cobalt up to \(250^\circ\), for nickel up to \(215^\circ\)), carry out exclusively the dehydrogenation of isopropyl alcohol to acetone. The gas formed was pure hydrogen, as shown by gas analysis. The catalyzate contained only acetone and unreacted alcohol, which was established by its distillation.

As was shown earlier \((^{2,5})\), the dehydrogenation of alcohols obeys the general kinetic equation for monomolecular catalytic reactions in a flow, derived by one of the authors \((^6)\). In the case of the dehydrogenation of alcohols without impurities, this equation has the form:

\[ \frac{dm}{dl} = k \frac{(A_1 - m)}{A_1 + (z_2 + z_3 - 1)m}, \tag{1} \]

where \(k\) is the reaction rate constant, \(A_1\) is the feed rate of the starting substance, \(z_2\) and \(z_3\) are the relative adsorption coefficients of ketone and hydrogen, \(m\) is the amount of hydrogen evolved per minute, and \(l\) is the length of the catalyst layer.

* But not by reduction of oxides with hydrogen, which is completed only at the temperature of appreciable sintering.

After integration of equation (1), we obtain:

\[ k=(z_2+z_3)A_1\ln\frac{A_1}{A_1-m}-(z_2+z_3-1)m . \tag{2} \]

The relative adsorption coefficients entering into equation (2) were determined by a reaction-kinetic method based on the decrease in the reaction rate when a known amount of the reaction product is added to the initial substance. The magnitude of the reaction rate during passage of the mixture and its comparison with the reaction rate during passage of the pure substance show to what extent the added substance is adsorbed on the active sites of the catalyst. The magnitude of the adsorption coefficients was calculated by the formula*:

\[ z=\frac{B_1(2H-Y)-HY}{(1-B_1)Y}, \tag{3} \]

where \(B_1=A_1/\Sigma A_r\); \(Y=m/\Sigma A_r\); \(H=Y_0/(2-Y_0)\). Here \(Y\) is the degree of conversion in experiments with mixtures, and \(Y_1\) is that with the pure substance.

Table 1

Relative adsorption coefficients \(z_2\)

Catalyst Temperature, °C \(z_2=a_{\text{ац}}/a_{\text{сп}}\)
Iron 210 \(0.66 \pm 0.02\)
Iron 230 \(0.70 \pm 0.07\)
Iron 240 \(0.71 \pm 0.06\)
Cobalt 206 \(0.45 \pm 0.03\)
Cobalt 221 \(0.48 \pm 0.03\)
Cobalt 238 \(0.45 \pm 0.03\)
Nickel 166 \(1.51 \pm 0.03\)
Nickel 182 \(1.35 \pm 0.06\)
Nickel 198 \(1.16 \pm 0.10\)
Nickel 209 \(1.00 \pm 0.02\)

Table 2

Relative adsorption coefficients \(z_3\)

Catalyst Temperature, °C \(z_3=a_{\mathrm{H_2}}/a_{\text{сп}}\)
Iron 200 \(0.20 \pm 0.02\)
Iron 220 \(0.05 \pm 0.02\)
Iron 235 \(0.06 \pm 0.02\)
Iron 247 \(0.10 \pm 0.02\)
Cobalt 204 \(1.03 \pm 0.03\)
Cobalt 223 \(1.02 \pm 0.08\)
Cobalt 238 \(1.04 \pm 0.01\)
Nickel 172 \(0.39 \pm 0.01\)
Nickel 184 \(0.25 \pm 0.02\)
Nickel 197 \(0.16 \pm 0.01\)
Nickel 206 \(0.11 \pm 0.01\)

The relative adsorption coefficients were determined from the rate of dehydrogenation of binary mixtures of the reaction products with the initial alcohol. In this case the volumetric rate of the alcohol in the experiment with the pure substance was equal to the total volumetric rate of the alcohol and the reaction product in the experiments with mixtures. To check the constancy of the catalyst activity, experiments with mixtures were alternated with experiments with the pure substance. Tables 1 and 2 give the results of determining the adsorption coefficients. The adsorption-displacement curves, constructed from five points at each temperature, had the general form observed in \((^{5,8})\).

As is seen from Tables 1 and 2, the relative adsorption coefficients of acetone and hydrogen on iron and cobalt catalysts do not depend on temperature. A dependence of the adsorption coefficients on temperature is observed only in the case of nickel, on which the relative ad—

* Calculation of the relative adsorption coefficients by the exact method \((^{7})\) shows that, in the cases studied by us, the approximate formula (3) makes it possible to calculate these quantities with satisfactory accuracy.

sorption coefficients of both products decrease with increasing temperature. The dependence of these adsorption coefficients on temperature is logarithmic, as is evident from Fig. 1, where the dependence of \(\lg z\) on \(1/T\) is plotted. A logarithmic dependence of the relative adsorption coefficients on temperature was also observed in other works \((^{2,8})\) and is consistent with the view that treats adsorption coefficients as equilibrium constants of the adsorption process. From the data obtained, the differences between the heats of adsorption of hydrogen, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol were calculated from the formula:

\[ \lambda_{\text{prod}}-\lambda_{\text{sp}} = -\frac{4.57\left(\lg z''/z'\right)}{1/T_1-1/T_2}. \tag{4} \]

The values obtained were: \(\lambda_{\text{ac}}-\lambda_{\text{sp}}=3.7\) kcal/mole and \(\lambda_{\mathrm{H_2}}-\lambda_{\text{sp}}=14.5\) kcal/mole. In the case of iron and cobalt, the heats of adsorption of the alcohol and the reaction products are equal or close to one another, as follows from the independence of the adsorption coefficients from temperature \((^{9,10})\).

Fig. 1. Dependence of the logarithm of the relative adsorption coefficients of acetone and hydrogen on reciprocal temperature on a Ni catalyst

Fig. 1. Dependence of the logarithm of the relative adsorption coefficients of acetone and hydrogen on reciprocal temperature on a Ni catalyst

The adsorption coefficients were then used to calculate the reaction-rate constants at different temperatures. In order to determine the true activation energy of dehydrogenation, a series of experiments was carried out with each catalyst at different temperatures and constant space velocity. To calculate the rate constants, the values \(A_1\), \(m\), and \(z_2+z_3\) were substituted into formula (2). For the nickel catalyst

Table 3

Dehydrogenation of iso-\(\mathrm{C_3H_7OH}\) on Fe; catalyst volume 5.6 ml; feed rate 0.15 ml/min; \(A_1=45\) ml/min; \(A'_1=8.03\) ml/min per 1 ml catalyst; \(z_2+z_3=0.79\); \(\varepsilon=20\,000\) cal/mole; \(k_0=7.08\cdot10^8\); \(\varepsilon/\lg k_0=2.26\cdot10^3\)

Experiment No. Temp., °C \(V_{\mathrm{H_2}}\), ml/min \(m_{\mathrm{H_2}}\), ml/min per 1 ml catalyst \(k\) \(k_{\text{calc}}\)
3 200 2.28 0.407 0.409 0.403
7 200 2.24 0.400 0.406 0.403
5 210 3.31 0.592 0.606 0.630
2 220 5.32 0.950 1.004 0.966
1 227 6.66 1.19 1.27 1.26
4 232 7.64 1.36 1.47 1.55
6 235 9.03 1.61 1.76 1.78

Table 4

Dehydrogenation of iso-\(\mathrm{C_3H_7OH}\) on Co; catalyst volume 7 ml; feed rate 0.15 ml/min; \(A_1=45\) ml/min; \(A'_1=6.43\) ml/min per 1 ml catalyst; \(z_2+z_3=1.49\); \(\varepsilon=12\,400\) cal/mole; \(k_0=8.03\cdot10^5\); \(\varepsilon/\lg k_0=2.1\cdot10^3\)

Experiment No. Temp., °C \(V_{\mathrm{H_2}}\), ml/min \(m_{\mathrm{H_2}}\), ml/min per 1 ml catalyst \(k\) \(k_{\text{calc}}\)
5 183 5.80 0.828 0.943 0.890
7 189 6.25 0.894 1.00 1.05
8 194 7.33 1.05 1.20 1.21
6 198 8.67 1.24 1.44 1.38
2 199 8.90 1.27 1.49 1.42
3 210 11.20 1.60 1.96 1.88
1 211 10.96 1.57 1.92 1.95
4 218 13.20 1.89 2.33 2.42

the value \(z_2+z_3\) at the required temperature was found by interpolation of the straight lines of the logarithmic dependence (Fig. 1). The results obtained are given in Tables 3–5 and in Fig. 2. The linear dependence of \(\lg k\) on \(1/T\) is in agreement with the Arrhenius equation, which confirms the validity of equation (2). The true activation energy of alcohol dehydrogenation on Fe and Co was determined for the first time. In work \((^2)\), for the dehydrogenation of butanol-2 over a nickel-on-quartz catalyst, \(\varepsilon=9.9\) kcal/mole was obtained, i.e., only slightly higher than here.

As the data show, the activation energy of dehydrogenation on the metals we studied decreases from iron to nickel. The activity of catalysts of transition metals of the fourth period increases with an increase in the atomic number of the metal and with a decrease in the interatomic distance.

Fig. 2. Dependence of the logarithm of the dehydrogenation rate constants on reciprocal temperature: a—on iron, b—on cobalt, c—on nickel

Table 5

Dehydrogenation of iso-C₃H₇OH on Ni; catalyst volume 0.5 ml; feed rate 0.15 ml/min; \(A_1 = 45\) ml/min; \(A'_1 = 90\) ml/min per 1 ml catalyst; \(\varepsilon = 8900\) cal/mol, \(k_0 = 3.67 \cdot 10^5\); \(\varepsilon/\lg k_0 = 1.6 \cdot 10^3\)

Experiment no. Temp., °C \(V_{\mathrm{H_2}}\), ml/min \(m\mathrm{H_2}\), ml/min per 1 ml catalyst \(z_k + z_s\) \(k\) \(k_{\mathrm{calc}}\)
1 185 8.8 17.6 1.54 20.54 20.65
2 196 12.0 24.0 1.32 29.20 26.10
3 175 7.0 14.0 1.78 16.33 16.60
4 186 9.0 18.0 1.46 21.13 21.13
5 211 14.6 29.2 1.09 35.67 34.70
6 168 6.0 12.0 2.08 13.82 14.10
7 156 4.9 9.8 2.71 10.35 10.40
8 206 13.8 27.6 1.14 33.63 31.30

The new results obtained in the present work are important for elucidating the dependence of the catalytic activity of elements on their position in Mendeleev’s periodic system.

Moscow State University
named after M. V. Lomonosov

Received
23 III 1957

REFERENCES

  1. A. A. Balandin, A. M. Rubinshtein, ZhFKh, 6, 576 (1935).
  2. A. A. Balandin, E. I. Klabunovskii, DAN, 98, 783 (1954).
  3. C. Thonon, J. C. Jungers, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg., 58, 331 (1949); 59, 604 (1950).
  4. A. A. Balandin, P. Teteni, DAN, 113, No. 5, 1090 (1957).
  5. A. E. Agronomov, Vestn. MGU, 6, No. 2, 109 (1951).
  6. A. A. Balandin, ZhOKh, 12, 153 (1942).
  7. A. A. Balandin, ZhOKh, 12, 160 (1942).
  8. A. A. Tolstopyatova, A. A. Balandin, E. M. Dmitriev, Izv. AN SSSR, ONKh, 1956, 1404.
  9. A. A. Balandin, DAN, 63, 33 (1948).
  10. A. Kh. Bork, Collected Works on Physical Chemistry, Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1947, p. 168.

Submission history

Kinetics of Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Isopropyl Alcohol in the Presence of Period IV Transition Metals