Abstract Generated abstract
This note studies linear functionals on the spaces of multivariable functions \(C_{s_1\ldots s_n}\) and \(L^p_{s_1\ldots s_n}\) that vanish on systems of generalized polynomials defined by prescribed one-variable function systems with nonzero Wronskians. It extends earlier representation results for remainders of approximation formulas exact on ordinary polynomials, showing how such functionals decompose into coordinate functionals and can be represented through integrals involving generalized differential operators \(D_{s_i}\), Cauchy functions, and functions of bounded variation or density functions. Further theorems describe extensions to differential complexes, relations between representations of different ranks, and consequences for sign changes. An example applies the theory to a cubature formula exact for generalized trigonometric-polynomial systems of rank at most three in each variable.
Full Text
MATHEMATICS
I. A. EZROKHI
ON FUNCTIONALS IN THE SPACES \(C_{s_1\ldots s_n}\) AND \(L^p_{s_1\ldots s_n}\), ANNIHILATING ON GENERALIZED POLYNOMIALS OF MANY VARIABLES
(Presented by Academician V. I. Smirnov, 14 VI 1957)
Let \(V(f)\) be the remainder term of an approximation formula, linear \((^{1})\) on some Banach space \(E\) and exact on some finite-dimensional subspace \(\Omega\). Then \(V(f)\) is linear on \(E\) and annihilates on \(\Omega\).
A number of works \((^{3-10})\) are devoted to a convenient representation of \(V(f)\), both on \(E\) and on its subspaces, in the case when \(\Omega\) is the set of polynomials of degree not exceeding a certain degree.
In the present note, which generalizes the results of E. Ya. Remez \((^{3})\) and of the author \((^{9})\), results are given on the representation of \(V(f)\) in the case when \(E=C_{s_1\ldots s_n}\bigl(L^p_{s_1\ldots s_n}\bigr)\) (for the notation and definitions see \((^{9})\)), and \(\Omega\) is a certain collection of generalized polynomials.
Definition 1. Suppose \(n\) systems of linearly independent functions \(\{u_{i,k_i}(x_i)\}\subset C_{2s_i-1}\), \(k_i=0,1,\ldots,s_i-1\), \(i=1,\ldots,n\), are chosen. Then by a generalized polynomial with respect to \(x_i\) of rank not exceeding \(s_i-1\) we shall mean the function
\[ \omega_{\mu_i}(x_1,\ldots,x_n) = \sum_{k_i=0}^{\mu_i-1} c^i_{k_i}(x_1,\ldots,x_{i-1},x_{i+1},\ldots,x_n)\, u_{i,k_i}(x_i) \quad(\mu_i\le s_i), \]
where all \(c^i_{k_i}\) are continuous.
Definition 2. By \(W_{\mu_i}=W(u_{i,0},\ldots,u_{i,\mu_i-1})\) we shall mean the Wronskian determinant formed from the functions \(u_{i,0},\ldots,u_{i,\mu_i-1}\), and we shall write its nonvanishing on \([a_i,b_i]\) as follows: \(W_{\mu_i}\ne 0\).
Definition 3. We set
\[ D_{\mu_i}(f)=D_{\mu_i,x_i}(f,x_i) = \frac{ W\bigl(u_{i,0}(x_i),\ldots,u_{i,\mu_i-1}(x_i), f(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\bigr) }{ W\bigl(u_{i,0}(x_i),\ldots,u_{i,\mu_i-1}(x_i)\bigr) }. \]
Definition 4. Henceforth \(V_i(f)\) is a functional annihilating on the collection \(\{\omega_{\mu_i}\}\) \((\mu\le s_i)\), and \(V(f)\) is a functional annihilating on the collection of generalized polynomials \(\{\omega_{\mu_1\ldots\mu_n}\}\) of rank not exceeding \(s_i-1\) \((\mu_i\le s_i)\) with respect to \(x_i\), \(i=1,\ldots,n\).
Theorem 1. Suppose \(V\in(C_{s_1\ldots s_n})^*\) (i.e., \(V(f)\) is linear on \(C_{s_1\ldots s_n}\)), respectively \((L^p_{s_1\ldots s_n})^*\). Then, if for every \(i\) \((i=1,\ldots,n)\) \(W_{s_i}\ne0\), then
\[ V(f)=\sum_{i=1}^{n} V_i(f), \]
where \(V_i\in(C_{s_i})^*\), respectively \((L^p_{s_i})^*\).
Theorem 2. Suppose \(V_i\in(C_{s_i})^*\) and \(W_{s_i}\ne0\). Then
\[ V_i(f)=\int_{K_n}\cdots\int D_{s_i}(f)\,d^n g_{s_i}(x_1,\ldots,x_n); \tag{1} \]
\[ g_{s_i}(\bar x_1,\ldots,\bar x_n)=\bar V_i(\gamma_{s_i,\bar x_1\ldots \bar x_n}) =\lim_{m\to\infty}V_i\left[\int_{b_i}^{x_i} \theta_{\bar x_i}^m(z)H_{s_i}(x_i,z)\,dz\cdot \prod_{j\ne i}\theta_{\bar x_j}^m(x_j)\right]^*, \]
where \(H_{s_i}(x_i,z)\) is the Cauchy function \((^2)\) of the differential equation \(D_{s_i}(f)=0\),
\[ \theta_{\bar x_i}^m(x_i)= \begin{cases} 1, & \text{if } x_i\leqslant \bar x_i,\ a_i<\bar x_i,\\ 0, & \text{if } x_i\geqslant \bar x_i+\dfrac1m \text{ or } \bar x_i=a_i,\\ 1-m(x_i-\bar x_i), & \text{if } \bar x_i<x_i<\bar x_i+\dfrac1m\quad (i=1,\ldots,n), \end{cases} \]
and the function \(g_{s_i}(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\) has the same properties as \(g_i(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\) in Theorem 1 \((^9)\).
Theorem 3. Let \(V_i\in (L_{s_i}^p)^*\) and \(W_{s_i}\ne 0\). Then
\[ V_i(f)=\int\cdots\int_{K_{n-1}}\int_{a_i}^{b_i} D_{s_i}(f)\,dx_{j\ne i}^{\,n-1}\,\beta_{s_i}(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\,dx_i, \tag{2} \]
where \({}^{**}\)
\[ \beta_{s_i}(\bar x_1,\ldots,\bar x_n) =\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\bar V_i(\gamma_{s_i,\bar x_1\ldots \bar x_n}) \]
and it has the same properties as \(\beta_i(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\) in Theorem 2 \((^9)\).
Theorem 4. Let \(F\in (C_{\mu_i})^*\). Then
\[ F(f)=\sum_{j_i=0}^{\mu_i-1}\int\cdots\int_{K_{n-1}} \frac{\partial^{j_i} f(x_1,\ldots,x_{i-1},b_i,x_{i+1},\ldots,x_n)} {\partial x_i^{j_i}} \times \]
\[ \times\, dx_{j\ne i}^{\,n-1} g_{j_i}(x_1,\ldots,x_{i-1},x_{i+1},\ldots,x_n) +\int\cdots\int_{K_n}\frac{\partial^{\mu_i}f}{\partial x_i^{\mu_i}}\,d^n g_{\mu_i}(x_1,\ldots,x_n), \]
where
\[ g_{j_i}(\ldots,\bar x_{i-1},\bar x_{i+1},\ldots) = \bar F(\psi_{j_i,\bar x_1,\ldots,\bar x_{i-1},b_i,\bar x_{i+1},\ldots,\bar x_n}) \quad (j_i=0,\ldots,\mu_i-1), \]
\[ g_{\mu_i}(\bar x_1,\ldots,\bar x_n)=\bar F(\psi_{\mu_i,\bar x_1,\ldots,\bar x_n}) \]
and, for example \((^9)\),
\[ \bar F(\psi_{\mu_i,\bar x_1\ldots \bar x_n}) = \lim_{m\to\infty}F\left( \int_{b_i}^{x_i}\theta_{\bar x_i}^m(z_i) \frac{(x_i-z_i)^{\mu_i-1}}{(\mu_i-1)!}\,dz_i \prod_{j\ne i}\theta_{\bar x_j}^m(x_j) \right), \]
with all functions \(g\) of bounded variation in all variables and continuous from the right inside \(K_n\) \((^{7,8})\).
Let us now consider the differential complexes \((^{3,7,8})\)
\[ (f,\bar f_{x_i}^{(\mu_i)})_{\mu_i} = \bigl(f(x_1,\ldots,x_n),\, f_{x_i}^{(j_i)}(x_1,\ldots,x_{i-1},b_i,x_{i+1},\ldots,x_n), \]
\[ 0\leqslant j_i\leqslant \mu_i-1,\, \bar f_{x_i}^{(\mu_i)}(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\bigr), \]
* We do not dwell on the fact that the values of the function \(g_{s_i}(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\) may be changed on a countable set of points in each variable inside \(K_n\), without thereby changing the functional. Henceforth this equality serves as the definition of \(g_{s_i}\).
** Obviously, the values of the function \(\beta_{s_i}\) may be changed on a set of measure zero with respect to \(x_i\), without thereby changing the functional (see, moreover, the preceding footnote). Henceforth this equality serves as the definition of \(\beta_{s_i}\).
terms of which are connected by the relation:
\[ f(x_1,\ldots,x_n)= \sum_{j_i=0}^{\mu_i-1} f_{x_i}^{(j_i)}(\ldots x_{i-1}, b_i, x_{i+1},\ldots) \frac{(x_i-b_i)^j}{j!} + \]
\[ +\int_{b_i}^{x_i}\bar f_{x_i}^{(\mu_i)}(\ldots x_{i-1}, z_i, x_{i+1},\ldots) \frac{(x_i-z_i)^{\mu_i-1}}{(\mu_i-1)!}\,dz_i, \]
where the integral is understood in the sense of Lebesgue.
Let \(C_{\mu_i}''\) be the space of complexes for which \(\bar f_{x_i}^{(\mu_i)}\) are Borel-measurable \((^7)\), with norm equal to the greatest of the exact upper bounds of the absolute values of the members of the complex. Then we extend \(F\in(C_{\mu_i})^*\) to \(C_{\mu_i}''\) as follows:
\[ F[(f,\bar f_{x_i}^{(\mu_i)})_{\mu_i}] = \sum_{j_i=0}^{\mu_i-1}\int_{K_{n-1}}\cdots\int f_{x_i}^{(j_i)}\,d_{x_j\ne i}^{\,n-1}g_{j_i} + \int_{K_n}\cdots\int \bar f_{x_i}^{(\mu_i)}\,d^n g_{\mu_i}, \]
where the integrals from Theorem 4 are now understood in the Stieltjes–Lebesgue sense.
Theorem 5. Let \(V_i\in(C_{s_i-k})^*\) \((1\le k\le s_i)\) and \(W_{\mu_i}\ne0\). Then for \(f\in L_{\mu_i}^p\) \((s_i-k<\mu_i\le s_i)\), \(V_i(f)\) has the form (2), and for \(f\in C_{\mu_i}\) also the form (1), everywhere with replacement of the index \(s_i\) by \(\mu_i\). Moreover, for each \(m\) \((1\le m<\mu_i-s_i+k)\) everywhere, and for \(m=\mu_i-s_i+k\), apart from all possible exclusions with respect to \(x_i\),
\[ \frac{\partial^{m-1}\beta_{\mu_i}(\bar x_1,\ldots,\bar x_n)} {\partial\bar x_i^{\,m-1}} = -\,V_i\bigl[(\lambda_{\mu_i-m,\bar x_1\ldots\bar x_n}^{(\mu_i)}, \lambda_{0,\bar x_1\ldots\bar x_n}^{(\mu_i)})_{\mu_i-m}\bigr], \]
where the right-hand side is equal to zero for \(\bar x_i=a_i\), \(\bar x_i=b_i\) and is continuous on the right inside \(K_n\), while
\[ g_{\mu_i}=\int_{a_i}^{x_i}\beta_{\mu_i}\,dx_i \]
and
\[ \lambda_{\mu_i-m,\bar x_1\ldots\bar x_n}^{(\mu_i)}(x_1,\ldots,x_n) = \prod_{j=1}^{n}\theta_{\bar x_j}(x_j) \frac{\partial^{m-1}H_{\mu_i}(x_i,\bar x_i)} {\partial\bar x_i^{\,m-1}}, \]
\[ \lambda_{0,\bar x_1\ldots\bar x_n}^{(\mu_i)}(x_1,\ldots,x_n) = \prod_{j=1}^{n}\theta_{\bar x_j}(x_j) \frac{\partial^{\mu_i-1}H_{\mu_i}(x_i,\bar x_i)} {\partial x_i^{\,\mu_i-m}\partial\bar x_i^{\,m-1}}. \]
Theorem 6. If \(V_i\in(C_{s_i-\mu_i})^*\), \(s_i\ge\mu_i>k\ge1\), \(W_{s_i}\ne0\), \(W_{s_i-k}\ne0\), then
\[ \beta_{s_i}(\bar x_1,\ldots,\bar x_n) = -\int_{a_i}^{x_i} H_{s_i,s_i-k}(z_i,\bar x_i) \beta_{s_i-k}(\bar x_1,\ldots,z_i,\ldots,\bar x_n)\,dz_i, \]
where \(H_{s_i,s_i-k}(x_i,\bar x_i)\) is the Cauchy function of the differential operator \(Q_{s_i,s_i-k}\),
\[ D_{s_i}(f)=Q_{s_i,s_i-k}(D_{s_i-k}(f)). \]
The last two theorems also make it possible to judge the number of sign changes of the functions \(\beta_{\mu_i}'\) \((^4,^8,^9)\).
It remains to note that, under the condition \(u_{i,0}=1\) \((i=1,\ldots,n)\), there hold assertions analogous both in form and in proof
all the results established in (⁹) (pp. 399–413), with the corresponding replacement of words and symbols: “polynomial,” “degree,” \(\varphi_{n-1,\bar x}(x)\), \(\partial^\mu f/\partial x^\mu\) by “generalized polynomial,” “rank,” \(\lambda^{(\mu)}_{\mu-1,\bar x}(x)\), \(D_\mu(f)\) (if \(W_\mu \ne 0\)).
Example. Suppose a cubature formula is given
\[ \frac{1}{\pi^2}\int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2}\int_{-\pi/2}^{\pi/2} f(x_1,x_2)\,dx_1\,dx_2 -\sum_{k=1}^{9} A_k f(x_1^k,x_2^k)=V(f), \]
\[ A_1=A_2=A_3=A_4=\left(\frac12-\frac1\pi\right)^2, \]
\[ A_5=A_6=A_7=A_8=\frac{2\pi-4}{\pi^2},\qquad A_9=\frac{12-4\pi}{\pi^2}, \]
\[ -\,x_1^1=x_1^2=x_1^3=-\,x_1^4=-\,x_2^1=-\,x_2^2=x_2^3=x_2^4=\frac{\pi}{2}, \]
\[ -\,x_1^5=x_1^7=-\,x_2^6=x_2^8=\frac{\pi}{3}, \]
\[ x_1^6=x_1^8=x_1^9=x_2^5=x_2^7=x_2^9=0. \]
It is exact for generalized polynomials of rank not higher than 3 in each variable, where for \(i=1,2\)
\[ u_{i,0}(x_i)\equiv 1,\qquad u_{i,1}(x_i)=x_i,\qquad u_{i,2}(x_i)=\cos x_i,\qquad u_{i,3}(x_i)=\sin x_i. \]
Then for \(f\in C_{4,4}\)
\[
V(f)=\frac{1}{144}(105\pi^2-520\pi+644)
\left\{\left(\frac{\partial^4}{\partial x^4}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\right)f(\xi_1,\eta_1)
+\left(\frac{\partial^4}{\partial y^4}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}\right)f(\xi_2,\eta_2)\right\}
\]
\[
-\frac{1}{144}(117\pi^2-560\pi+652)
\left\{\left(\frac{\partial^4}{\partial x^4}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\right)f(\xi_3,\eta_3)
+\left(\frac{\partial^4}{\partial y^4}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}\right)f(\xi_4,\eta_4)\right\}.
\]
Ukrainian Agricultural Academy
Received
12 VI 1957
REFERENCES
¹ S. S. Banach, Course of Functional Analysis. Radianska shkola, 1946.
² E. Goursat, Course of Mathematical Analysis, 2, part 2, 1933.
³ E. Ya. Remez, Tr. Inst. Mat. AN USSR, 3, Kiev (1939).
⁴ E. Ya. Remez, Tr. Inst. Mat. AN USSR, 4, Kiev (1940).
⁵ A. Sard, Acta Math., 84, 319 (1951).
⁶ A. Sard, Proc. Internat. Congr. Math. Amsterdam, 2, 1954.
⁷ T. G. Ezrokhi, Nauch. zap. Kievsk. ped. inst., 16, No. 5 (1954).
⁸ T. G. Ezrokhi, I. A. Ezrokhi, Izv. Kievsk. politekhn. inst., 19 (1956).
⁹ I. A. Ezrokhi, Matem. sborn., 38 (80), 4 (1956).
¹⁰ S. M. Nikol’skii, Izv. AN SSSR, ser. matem., 16, No. 2, 181 (1952).