Abstract Generated abstract
This paper studies completeness and basis properties in the Hilbert space \(L_2\) for systems of functions that are close to known complete systems. It proves a general operator criterion: an invertible bounded linear transformation preserves completeness and basis properties, then applies it to perturbations \(f_n=g_n+\lambda R_n\) using biorthogonal systems and integral operators with square summable kernels. The results give sufficient, and in some cases necessary and sufficient, conditions under which perturbed systems remain complete or form bases, including cases of quadratic closeness, \(B\)-closeness, strictly minimal systems, and analogues in the dense Banach subspace \(A_g\) with \(l_1\) coefficient norm.
Full Text
MATHEMATICS
Yu. A. KAZ’MIN
ON COMPLETE SYSTEMS AND BASES IN \(L_2\)
(Presented by Academician S. L. Sobolev on 22 XI 1956)
The article considers questions connected with the problem of completeness in \(L_2\) of systems of functions that are “close” in a certain sense (\(L_2\), as usual, is the Hilbert space of functions square-summable on the segment \([a,b]\)). First, a theorem of a general character is proved, which is subsequently used as a criterion in solving the question of the completeness of “close” systems.
§ 1. Let the set \(G \subset L_2\) be everywhere dense in \(L_2\). We shall assume that \(G\) forms a space of type (B), and moreover that from
\[
\lim_{n\to\infty}\|f-f_n\|_G=0
\]
it always follows that
\[
\lim_{n\to\infty}\|f-f_n\|_{L_2}=0
\]
(the norm in \(G\) in the case \(G\ne L_2\) is distinct from the norm in \(L_2\)).
The following almost obvious assertion holds:
Theorem 1. Let a bounded linear operator \(T\) be defined on \(G\), mapping \(G\) into itself and possessing a unique inverse \(T^{-1}\). If \(\{g_n\}\), \(n=1,2,\ldots\), is a complete system or a basis in \(G\), then the system of functions
\[
f_n=Tg_n,\qquad n=1,2,\ldots,
\]
also forms, respectively, a complete system or a basis in \(G\).
Let us note that if \(\{g_n\}\) is a basis in \(G\), then the spaces of coefficients of expansions both with respect to the functions \(\{g_n\}\) and with respect to the functions \(\{f_n=Tg_n\}\) coincide. In particular, if \(G=L_2\), then a basis \(\{g_n\}\) in \(L_2\) also generates in \(L_2\) a basis \(\{f_n=Tg_n\}\) with the same space of expansion coefficients.
Let us also note that from the very definition of the set \(G\) it follows that a system of functions \(\{f_n\}\) complete in \(G\) is complete in \(L_2\).
§ 2. \(G=L_2\). A system of functions \(\{g_n\}\subset L_2\) is called minimal if none of them belongs to the closed linear span of the others. It is easy to show that the system \(\{g_n\}\) is minimal if and only if from
\[
\lim_{n\to\infty}\left|c_1^{(n)}g_1+c_2^{(n)}g_2+\cdots+c_n^{(n)}g_n\right|=0
\]
it follows that
\[
\lim_{n\to\infty}c_i^{(n)}=0,\qquad i=1,2,\ldots.
\]
S. S. Levin proved \((^1)\) that if the system \(\{g_n\}\) is minimal, then there exists a sequence of functions \(\{h_n\}\) forming with \(\{g_n\}\) a biorthogonal system, i.e.
\[
(g_n,h_k)=\int_a^b g_nh_k\,dx=\delta_{nk},\qquad
\delta_{nk}=
\begin{cases}
1 & \text{if } n=k,\\
0 & \text{if } n\ne k.
\end{cases}
\]
Let \(\{g_n\}\) be a complete minimal system of functions, and let the sequence of functions \(\{R_n\}\), \(R_n\in L_2\), \(n=1,2,\ldots\), be such that the double series converges ...
series
\[ \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} (R_i,R_k)(h_i,h_k), \tag{1} \]
\((g_n,h_k)=\delta_{nk}\); then the system of functions \(\{f_n=g_n+\lambda R_n\}\) is complete in \(L_2\) for all regular values \(\lambda\) of the integral equation
\[ f(x)=g(x)+\lambda\int_a^b K(x,s)\,g(s)\,ds \tag{2} \]
with kernel
\[ K(x,s)=\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} R_i(x)h_i(s). \tag{3} \]
Indeed, in this case
\[ \int_a^b\int_a^b [K(x,s)]^2\,dx\,ds = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(R_i,R_k)(h_i,h_k)<\infty, \]
and therefore the integral equation (2) defines a linear operator \(T_\lambda=J+\lambda K\), mapping \(L_2\) into itself. It remains to note that \(f_n=T_\lambda g_n\), and, if \(\lambda\) is a regular value of \(T_\lambda\), to apply Theorem 1.
In particular, the system of functions \(\{f_n=g_n+R_n\}\) is complete in \(L_2\) if
\[ \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(R_i,R_k)(h_i,h_k)<1. \]
A system of functions \(\{f_n\}\), \(n=1,2,\ldots\), is called linearly independent in \(L_2\) (l.i. in \(L_2\)) if from \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n f_n=0\) it always follows that \(c_n=0\), \(n=1,2,\ldots\). Every minimal system is l.i. in \(L_2\); the converse, generally speaking, is false.
Lemma 1. If \(\{g_n\}\) is a basis (or a complete minimal system) in \(L_2\), and the functions \(\{f_n=g_n+\lambda R_n\}\) are l.i. in \(L_2\) (respectively, also form a minimal system) and are such that the double series (1) converges, then \(\lambda\) is a regular value of the integral equation (2) with kernel (8).
Otherwise the integral equation
\[ (J+\lambda K)g=0 \tag{4} \]
has in \(L_2\) a nontrivial solution \(g\), \(\|g\|\ne0\). Representing \(g\) in the form
\[ g=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n g_n \]
(respectively,
\[ g=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left[c_1^{(n)}g_1+c_2^{(n)}g_2+\cdots+c_n^{(n)}g_n\right] \]
) and substituting this expansion into (4), we find that the system \(\{f_n=g_n+\lambda R_n\}\) is not l.i. (respectively, minimal) in \(L_2\), which contradicts what was assumed above.
From Lemma 1 it follows:
Theorem 2. Let the system of functions \(\{f_n\}\) be l.i. in \(L_2\) (or minimal), and let \(\{g_n\}\), \(n=1,2,\ldots\), be a basis (respectively, a complete minimal system) in \(L_2\); if, moreover, the double series
\[ \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(R_i,R_k)(h_i,h_k), \]
converges, where \(R_n=f_n-g_n\), \((g_n,h_k)=\delta_{nk}\), then the system \(\{f_n\}\) is a basis (respectively, complete) in \(L_2\). The spaces of coefficients of expansions with respect to the systems \(\{g_n\}\) and \(\{f_n\}\) coincide.
The systems of functions \(\{g_n\}\) and \(\{f_n\}\) are called quadratically close if the series
\[
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\|R_n\|^2,\qquad R_n=f_n-g_n
\]
converges \(((1), p. 51)\), and \(B\)-close if
\[
\sum_{i,k=1}^{\infty}\left|(R_i;R_k)\right|<\infty .
\]
From what has been set forth, the following theorems on complete systems, obtained earlier by another method by N. K. Bari, follow as consequences.
\(1^\circ\). If \(\{g_n\}\) is a complete orthonormal system, and the system \(\{f_n\}\) is such that
\[
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\|R_n\|^2<1,\qquad R_n=f_n-g_n,
\]
then \(\{f_n\}\) is a basis in \(L_2\) with a space of expansion coefficients coinciding with \(l_2\) \(((2), p. 68)\).
\(2^\circ\). If \(\{g_n\}\) is a complete orthonormal system, and the system of functions \(\{f_n\}\), quadratically close to \(\{g_n\}\), is l.i. in \(L_2\), then \(\{f_n\}\) is a basis in \(L_2\) with a space of expansion coefficients coinciding with \(l_2\) \(((2), p. 72)\)*.
We shall call the system \(\{g_n\}\) strictly minimal if there exists a constant \(\delta>0\) such that the distance from any \(g_i\) to the closed linear span of the remaining functions \(\{g_n\}\), \(n\ne i\), is greater than or equal to \(\delta\) for all \(i=1,2,\ldots\). It is said that \(\{g_n\}, \{h_n\}\) form a regular biorthogonal system if \(\{g_n\}\) is a complete system and, in addition, the conditions
\[
\sup_n\|g_n\|<\infty,\qquad \sup_n\|h_n\|<\infty
\]
are simultaneously satisfied. A biorthogonal system \(\{g_n\}, \{h_n\}\) is regular if and only if \(\{g_n\}\) is a complete bounded (i.e.
\[
\sup_n\|g_n\|<\infty
\]
), strictly minimal system \((^4)\).
Using the results cited and Theorem 2, it is easy to obtain:
Theorem 3. If \(\{g_n\}\) is a complete, bounded, strictly minimal system, and \(\{f_n\}\) is a minimal system \(B\)-close to \(\{g_n\}\), then \(\{f_n\}\) is complete in \(L_2\).
Corollary. Two \(B\)-close, strictly minimal systems are complete or incomplete simultaneously.
Theorem 4. If \(\{g_n\}\) is a complete, bounded, strictly minimal system and
\[
h=\sup_n\|h_n\|,
\]
where
\[
(g_n,h_k)=\delta_{nk},
\]
and the system of functions \(\{f_n\}\) is such that
\[
\sum_{i,k=1}^{\infty}|(R_i;R_k)|<\frac{1}{h^2},\qquad R_n=f_n-g_n,
\]
then \(\{f_n\}\) is complete in \(L_2\).
A basis is a complete strictly minimal system. Therefore, if \(\{g_n\}\) is a basis in \(L_2\) and
\[
\sup_n\|g_n\|<\infty,
\]
and the system of functions \(\{f_n\}\) is l.i. in \(L_2\) and \(B\)-close to \(\{g_n\}\), then \(\{f_n\}\) is also a basis in \(L_2\), with the same space of expansion coefficients as that of \(\{g_n\}\).
It is easy to prove that when the systems of functions \(\{g_n\}\) and \(\{h_n\}\) form a complete biorthogonal sequence, i.e. both systems \(\{g_n\}\) and \(\{h_n\}\) are complete in \(L_2\), in all the cases considered above there exists a system \(\{F_n\}\) which forms, together with \(\{f_n\}\), also a complete biorthogonal system. Indeed, in these cases the operator \(T\), \(f_n=Tg_n\), has a unique inverse \(T^{-1}\). It remains to note that
\[
F_n=(T^{-1})^*h_n,
\]
where \((T^{-1})^*\) is the operator adjoint to \(T^{-1}\).
* In a later work, result \(2^\circ\) was extended by N. K. Bari to the so-called Riesz bases \((^3)\); however, it was not possible to obtain these generalizations from our theorems.
§ 3. Let us now consider the case where \(G \ne L_2\). Let \(\{g_n\}\), \(n=1,2,\ldots\), be a complete orthonormal system of functions. Put \(G=A_g\), where the set \(A_g \subset L_2\) is such that if \(f \in A_g\) and
\[ f=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} c_k g_k, \]
then the series
\[ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} |c_k| \]
converges. It is obvious that \(A_g\), everywhere dense in \(L_2\), is a space of type \((B)\) with norm, for \(f \in A_g\),
\[ \|f\|_{A_g}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} |c_k|, \]
and satisfies all the conditions imposed on the set \(G\) in § 1.
Lemma 2. Let a system of functions \(\{R_n\}\subset A_g\), \(n=1,2,\ldots\), be such that
\[ \sup_n |(R_n,g_k)|=\alpha_k, \]
and the series
\[ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\alpha_k \]
converges.
The integral equation
\[ f(x)=g(x)+\lambda\int_a^b K(x,s)g(s)\,ds \]
with kernel
\[ K(x,s)=\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} R_i(x)g_i(s) \]
defines on \(A_g\) a linear operator
\[ T_\lambda=I+\lambda K, \]
which maps \(A_g\) into itself and has in \(A_g\) a unique inverse for all values of \(\lambda\), except those which coincide with the zeros of the entire function
\[ \Delta(\lambda)= \left| \begin{array}{cccc} 1+\lambda a_{11} & \lambda a_{12} & \cdots \\ \lambda a_{21} & 1+\lambda a_{22} & \cdots \\ \cdots & \cdots & \cdots \end{array} \right|, \]
where \(a_{ik}=(g_i,R_k)\).
(It can be shown, relying on Koch’s criterion, that \(\Delta(\lambda)\) is an absolutely convergent determinant\(^5\).)
Without particular difficulty one proves the following modifications of Theorem 1.
Theorem 5. If \(\{g_n\}\) is a complete orthonormal system in \(L_2\), and the system \(\{f_n\}\) is such that
\[ \sup_n |(R_n,g_k)|=\alpha_k,\qquad R_n=f_n-g_n,\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\alpha_k<1, \]
then \(\{f_n\}\) is a basis in \(A_g\) with the space of coefficients of expansions coinciding with \(l_1\).
Theorem 6. Let \(\{g_n\}\) be a complete orthonormal system in \(L_2\). Then, in order that the system of functions \(\{f_n\}\),
\[ \sup_n |(R_n,g_k)|=\alpha_k,\qquad R_n=f_n-g_n,\qquad \sum \alpha_k<\infty, \]
be a basis in \(A_g\) with the space of coefficients of expansions coinciding with \(l_1\), it is necessary and sufficient that from
\[ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} c_n g_n=0,\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}|c_k|<\infty \]
it always follow that \(c_n=0\) for all \(n\).
In conclusion, we note that a system of functions \(\{f_n\}\) complete in \(A_g\) is complete in \(L_2\).
Azov–Black Sea Institute
of Agricultural Mechanization
Received
21 III 1956
CITED LITERATURE
\(^1\) S. Lewin, Math. Zs., 32, H. 4, 503 (1930).
\(^2\) N. K. Bari, Matem. sborn., 14 (56), 1–2, 51 (1944).
\(^3\) N. K. Bari, DAN, 54, No. 5, 385 (1946); Uch. zap. MGU, issue 148, mathematics, 4, 69 (1951).
\(^4\) M. M. Grinblyum, DAN, 47, No. 2, 79 (1945).
\(^5\) Fr. Riesz, Les systèmes d’équations linéaires à une infinité d’inconnues, Paris, 1913.