On the Physical Properties of Crystals

P. A. SAVINTSEV
Submitted 1958 | SovietRxiv: ru-195801.08518 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

This paper proposes molecular concentration, defined as density divided by molecular weight multiplied by 1000, as an experimentally accessible parameter for comparing multiple physical properties of crystals and related substances. Using tabulated literature data for alkali halide crystals, alkaline earth metal oxides, selected metals, and some liquid dielectrics, it examines correlations between this parameter and lattice energy, electrical strength, conductivity, thermal properties, hardness, elastic moduli, wear resistance, dielectric losses, and deformation characteristics. The comparison suggests that increasing molecular concentration is often associated with higher lattice energy, hardness, melting temperature, wear resistance, and related mechanical measures, while some dielectric, thermal, and plastic-flow quantities decrease or vary by material class. The paper concludes that molecular concentration can serve as a composite characteristic linking diverse properties of substances.

Full Text

ON THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF CRYSTALS

P. A. SAVINTSEV

(Presented by the scientific seminar of the Radio Engineering Faculty)

Crystals may be subjected simultaneously to considerable mechanical, thermal, and electrical influences. In such cases it is sometimes necessary to evaluate the totality of many properties of crystals.

The connection between the properties of ionic crystals and the energy of the crystal lattice has been shown [1,2]. However, experiments to determine the lattice energy are complicated, and data are lacking on the energy of crystals with impurities. It is therefore useful to find a physical quantity that is easily determined experimentally and is connected with many properties of a crystal: mechanical, thermal, electrical, etc.

We have found that a large number of constants characterizing the properties of a crystal depend on the molecular concentration. We denote this quantity by \(\alpha\) and find it from the formula: \(\alpha = \dfrac{D}{M}\cdot 10^3\),

where \(D\) is the density of the crystal, and \(M\) is the molecular weight.

The connection of \(\alpha\) with the properties of alkali-halide crystals is seen from Table 1. The designations in Table 1 are as follows: \(U\) is the energy of the crystal lattice in \(\mathrm{kcal}/\mathrm{mol}\), \(E_{\mathrm{pr}}\) is the electrical strength in \(\mathrm{mV}/\mathrm{cm}\), \(\varepsilon\) is the electronic component of the dielectric coefficient, \(\sigma\) is the ionic conductivity at the melting temperature, \(B\) is the constant entering into the conductivity equation \(\varepsilon = Ae^{-B/T}\), \(\beta\) is the coefficient of linear expansion, \(n_D\) is the refractive index of light. It should be noted that the value of the coefficient \(k\), which relates the constants to \(\alpha\), changes in going from compounds of one metal to compounds of another metal. Sometimes the values of \(k\) differ so little that they may be considered coincident. This is seen from Figs. 1, 2, 3.

In Table 2 we continue the comparison of mechanical characteristics and dielectric losses with the quantity \(\alpha\). In Table 2 the quantity \(\dfrac{\gamma}{\gamma_0}\) gives the relative values of the surface energy, determined by us by the method of mutual grinding [3]. From Table 2

it is evident that, with increasing \(\alpha\), the hardness of the crystals increases, while the dielectric losses (\(\operatorname{tg}\delta\) at a frequency of \(10^6\) Hz) and the flow pressure decrease. With increasing \(\alpha\), there is a tendency toward a decrease in the shear modulus and Young’s modulus.

Fig. 1. Relationship between the hardness of crystals and the molecular concentration \(\alpha\)

Fig. 1. Relationship between the hardness of crystals and the molecular concentration \(\alpha\)

Fig. 2. Relationship between the compressibility coefficient of alkali-halide crystals and the molecular concentration \(\alpha\)

Fig. 2. Relationship between the compressibility coefficient of alkali-halide crystals and the molecular concentration \(\alpha\)

Table 3 compares the properties of oxides of metals of the second group with the value of \(\alpha\). From Table 3 it is evident that, as \(\alpha\) increases, the following quantities increase: heat of sublimation, melting temperature, lattice energy, hardness. Heat capacity, entropy,

the heat of hydration decrease with increasing $\alpha$. To construct Tables 1, 2, 3 we used data [1—12].

Let us note that the dependence of properties on $\alpha$ is also observed for some liquid organic dielectrics.

Figure 3: Relation between the absorption maximum corresponding to the F-band and the molecular concentration alpha

Fig. 3. Relation between the absorption maximum corresponding to the F-band and the molecular concentration $\alpha$

Figure 4: Relation of the electric strength of a homologous series of liquid dielectrics to the molecular concentration alpha

Fig. 4. Relation of the electric strength of a homologous series of liquid dielectrics to the molecular concentration $\alpha$

Fig. 4 shows a decrease in the electric strength of a homologous series of liquid dielectrics with increasing $\alpha$. In solid dielectrics the electric strength increases with increasing $\alpha$ (Tab-

1). This confirms the statements in [13] on the different mechanism of breakdown in solid and liquid dielectrics.

Let us establish the relation of \(\alpha\) with the properties of metals.

M. M. Khrushchov and M. A. Babichev [14], studying the abrasive wear of metals at low rates of displacement of the specimens, found a relation between the relative wear resistance \(i\) and the Vickers hardness \(H\).

Table 1

Relation of \(\alpha\) to the properties of alkali-halide crystals

Salts \(\alpha\) U \(E_{np}\) \(\sigma\) B \(\varepsilon\) \(n_D\) \(\beta \cdot 10^6\) Heat of melting Heat of sublim. Heat of formation, solid
LiF 77 240 3,1 \(0,6 \cdot 10^{-2}\) 25500 1,9 1,38 30,7 6 63 145
LiCl 49 193 — \(1,5 \cdot 10^{-2}\) 19000 — 1,66 40,7 5 47 —
LiBr 40 183 — — — — 1,78 46,7 4,5 45 —
LiI 30 171 — — — — 1,95 55,7 — 44 —
NaF 65 215 2,4 \(1,7 \cdot 10^{-3}\) 26000 1,75 1,33 32,7 7,6 72 135
NaCl 37 180 1,5 \(1,3 \cdot 10^{-3}\) 22000 2,25 1,53 36,7 7,0 57 99
NaBr 31 172 1,0 \(1,3 \cdot 10^{-3}\) 20600 2,65 1,64 39,7 6,1 54 86
NaI 24 161 0,8 \(4,0 \cdot 10^{-3}\) — 2,93 1,79 46,5 5,2 50 65
KF 41 190 1,8 \(8,0 \cdot 10^{-4}\) 27200 1,83 1,35 33,3 6,5 50 134
KCl 26 164 1,0 \(2,0 \cdot 10^{-4}\) 23900 — 1,50 33,7 6,4 52 107
KBr 22 158 0,7 \(2,0 \cdot 10^{-4}\) 22800 — 1,55 36,7 6,2 50 95
KI 19 149 0,6 \(1,5 \cdot 10^{-4}\) 20500 — 1,68 41,7 4,1 49 79
RbF 28 181 — — — — 1,38 — 6 53 —
RbCl 23 159 0,8 \(5,0 \cdot 10^{-5}\) 24600 — 1,49 32,8 5 52 106
RbBr 20 152 0,6 \(3,5 \cdot 10^{-5}\) 23500 — 1,55 34,7 5 51 95
RbI 15 144 0,5 — — — 1,64 39,7 5 50 83

Table 2

Comparison of mechanical characteristics and dielectric losses with the value of \(\alpha\)

Salts \(\alpha\) Hardness: scratching Hardness: drilling Hardness: damping of oscill. Shear modulus, kg/mm² Young’s modulus, kg/mm² Yield pressure, kg/mm² \(\operatorname{tg}\delta \cdot 10^{-4}\) \(\gamma/\gamma_0\)
LiF 77 — — — 3204 14000 — 0,4 —
LiCl 49 — — 25 1696 6000 — — —
LiBr 40 2,6 — — 1718 1900 — — —
LiI 30 — — — — — — — —

Continuation of Table 2.

Salts $\alpha$ Hardness: scratching Hardness: drilling Hardness: damped oscill. Shear modulus, kg/mm² Young’s modulus, kg/mm² Flow pressure, kg/mm² $\operatorname{tg}\delta \cdot 10^{-4}$ $\dfrac{\gamma}{\gamma_0}$
NaF 65 — — — — — — — —
NaCl 37 2,5 1,1 20 1234 4400 72 0,6 1,45
NaBr 31 2,4 — — 923 4780 — — ,
NaI 24 — — — — — — — —
KF 41 — 1,3 — 857 7340 — — —
KCl 26 — 0,8 7 — — 50 0,7 1
KBr 22 2,3 0,6 — 369 4470 40 1,0 0,91
KI 19 2,2 — — 387 2470 31 1,3 —

Table 3

Comparison of the properties of oxides of metals of the second group with the value of $\alpha$

Crystals $\alpha$ $U$ Hardness by Mohs Heat capacity, $C_p$ Entropy Heat of hydration Heat of formation Heat of sublimation Melting temperature, abs
MgO 85 940 6,5 8,93 6,40 9,7 143,5 130 3073
CaO 59 853 4,5 10,23 9,50 15,9 151,9 128 2858
SrO 43 791 3,5 10,76 13,0 19,5 141,1 117 2703
BaO 35 747 3,3 11,34 16,8 24,5 134,0 90 2196

The values of $i$ and $H$ are given in Table 4, from which it is seen that, with increasing $\alpha$, the relative wear resistance of the specimens and their hardness increase.

In Table 4 (column 5) we give the time $t$ for the amplitude of oscillation of V. D. Kuznetsov’s pendulum [4] to decrease from 3 to 2 cm. The reciprocal of $t$ may be regarded as the hardness by the method of damped oscillations $H_3$. From Table 4 it is seen that, with increasing $\alpha$, the hardness $H_3$ increases.

In column 6 of Table 4 are given the values of the shear modulus $N$, taken from the book [15]. It may be noted that for all the metals considered, except cadmium, the shear modulus increases with increasing $\alpha$.

Table 4

Comparison of the mechanical properties of metals with the value \(\alpha\)

Metals \(\alpha\) \(i\) \(H,\ \mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{mm}^{2}\) \(t,\ \mathrm{sec}\) \(10^{-6},\ \mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{cm}^{2}\)
Pb 55 0.9 5 — 0.075
Sn 61 2.8 12 — 0.1
Cd 77 3.0 20 25 0.0063
Al 100 4.0 25 32 0.271
Zn 105 6.2 42 52 0.35
Cu 140 10 73 55 0.45
Ni 149 16 140 — 0.73

Tonn [16] determined the wear resistance \(i\) of various metals during grinding on abrasive paper. The values of \(i\) are given in Table 5, from which it is evident that, with increasing \(\alpha\), the wear resistance of metals increases.

Table 5

Comparison of the relative wear resistance of metals
with the value \(\alpha\)

Metals Sn Al Ag Zn Cu Ni
\(i\) 5 25 30 40 55—60 120
\(\alpha\) 61 100 97 105 140 149

V. D. Kuznetsov, N. A. Bessonov, and M. F. Pichenin [17] determined the abrasive wear of zinc, bismuth, and antimony. Polycrystalline specimens of the indicated substances were abraded against emery paper No. 00, which was fixed on a disk rotating at a speed of \(2.3—3.6\ \mathrm{cm/sec}\). The authors found the quantity \(M_{0}\), which is numerically equal to the mass of the ground-off layer per unit of frictional work and for a specimen area equal to unity. The values of \(M_{0}\) are given in Table 6, from which it is seen that \(M_{0}\) increases with increasing \(\alpha\).

V. D. Kuznetsov, N. A. Bessonov, and M. F. Pichenin also studied the wear of certain alkali-halide salts. Table 6 gives the values they obtained for \(\dfrac{F}{M}\)—the ratio of the friction force to the mass ground off. It is not difficult to see that \(\dfrac{F}{M}\) increases with increasing \(\alpha\).

M. A. Bolshanina [4] relates the process of plastic deformation to the properties of the crystal lattice. Therefore it is advisable to seek a connection between the constants characterizing the plastic properties of metals and \(\alpha\). Table 7 gives, according to the data of [18], the values ...

of the absorbed energy under static deformation \(W\), the ratio of \(W\) to the work of deformation \(A\), the absorbed energy under dynamic compression \(W_g\) (relative deformation 20%), the polytropic exponent \(m\), and the hardening coefficient \(a\). From Table 7 it is seen that with increasing \(\alpha\), \(W\), \(W : A\), \(W_g\), \(m\), and \(a\) increase.

Table 6

Comparison of wear characteristics with the value of \(\alpha\)

Sample Zn Sb Bi NaCl KCl KI
\(M_0 \cdot 10^{-6}\), kg 6.11 23.0 46.3 — — —
\(F : M\) — — — 14.7 11.2 5.17
\(\alpha\) 105 54 46 37 25 15

Table 7

Comparison of absorbed deformation energy with \(\alpha\)

Metals \(\alpha\) \(W\), cal, at deformations 25% \(W\), cal, at deformations 37% \(W\), cal, at deformations 49% \(W : A\), at deformations 25% \(W : A\), at deformations 37% \(W : A\), at deformations 49% \(W_g\), cal/cm³ \(m\) \(a\), kg/mm²
Cu 140 0.93 1.51 — 10 8.6 — 2.1 1.32 0.46
Al 100 0.30 0.47 0.61 7.6 6.8 5.4 1.3 — 0.22
Sn 61 0.01 0.01 0.01 1.4 0.5 0.7 — 1.05 —
Pb 55 0.01 0.001 0.02 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.96 0.02

Thus, the molecular concentration \(\alpha\) is a combined characteristic of many properties of substances.

LITERATURE

  1. Vorob’ev A. A. and Zavadovskaya E. K. Physical and electrical properties of ionic crystals, Izvestiya TPI, vol. 83, 1956.

  2. Zavadovskaya E. K. On dielectrics with high electrical strength, Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR, vol. 82, No. 5, 1952.

  3. Savintsev P. A. and Kutsepalenko V. V. Measurement of surface energies of single crystals of the potassium chloride—sodium chloride system by the method of drilling and mutual grinding, Izvestiya TPI, vol. 83, 1956.

  4. Kuznetsov V. D. Physics of the Solid State, vol. 1, 1937; vol. 2, 1941; vol. 4, 1947. Tomsk.

  5. Goldschmidt V. M. Krystallbau und chemische Zusammensetzung, Berichte d. Deutsch. Chem. Ges., 60, 1927.

  6. R. Auerbach, Über die Oberflächenenergie fester Werkstoffe, Werkstoffe und Korrosion, 5, No. 6, 1954.

  7. Kurnakov N. S. Collected Selected Works, vol. 1, ONTI, 1938; vol. 2, GONTI, 1939.

  8. Collection of Physical Constants, ed. by Ya. G. Dorfman and S. E. Frisch, ONTI, 1937.

  9. Technical Encyclopedia, Handbook of Physical, Chemical, and Technological Quantities, 1927.

  1. Vodopyanov K. A., Vorob’ev A. A., and Krivov M. A. Dielectric losses, electrical strength of crystals of alkali-halide salts, and lattice energy, Izvestiya TPI, vol. 83, 1956.

  2. Zeit V. Ionic conductivity in solid salts, Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk, vol. 18, no. 4, 1937.

  3. Zavadovskaya E. K. A note on the relation between the F-band of absorption in alkali-halide crystals and lattice energy, Izvestiya TPI, vol. 83, 1956.

  4. Vorob’ev A. A. and Kalganov A. F. On the question of the relation between the electrical strength of liquid dielectrics and their physicochemical properties, Izvestiya TPI, vol. 83, 1956.

  5. Khrushchov M. M. and Babichev M. A. Resistance to abrasive wear and hardness of metals, Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR, vol. 88, no. 3, 1953.

  6. Slavinskii M. P. Physicochemical Properties of the Elements, Metallurgizdat, 1952.

  7. W. Tonn. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Verschleißvorganges beim Kurzversuch am Beispiel der reinen Metalle, Z. s. Metallkunde, 6, 1937.

  8. Kuznetsov V. D., Bessonov A. A., and Pichenin M. F. Wearability of a surface under external friction depending on surface energy, Zhurnal prikladnoi fiziki, vol. 4, issue 3, 1927.

Submission history

On the Physical Properties of Crystals