Melting temperature of the contact layer of crystals

P. A. SAVINTSEV, V. E. AVERICHEVA
Submitted 1958 | SovietRxiv: ru-195801.08856 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

This paper examines whether contact melting, previously associated mainly with eutectic-forming pairs, also occurs in systems forming solid solutions. The authors heat paired crystals of alkali-halide salts and selected organic compounds while observing the contact surface and measuring the temperature at which liquid first appears, and they use X-ray diffraction to identify the product formed in some salt systems. Contact melting is found in alkali-halide pairs belonging to eutectic systems, systems with chemical compounds, systems forming solid solutions, and systems of unknown diagrams, as well as in organic pairs forming continuous solid solutions. The results suggest that contact melting is not a reliable standalone method for identifying eutectic points and may occur broadly in systems with descending liquidus lines.

Full Text

MELTING TEMPERATURE OF THE CONTACT LAYER OF CRYSTALS

P. A. SAVINTSEV, V. E. AVERICHEVA

(Presented by Professor Doctor A. A. Vorob’ev)

Introduction

Eutectic alloys differ from other heterogeneous and homogeneous alloys in a number of properties, one of which is, for example, their fusibility. Eutectics, unlike other alloys, crystallize at a constant temperature corresponding to the lowest point of the liquidus line. It is assumed that, in order to obtain a eutectic, it is necessary either to dissolve a high-melting component in a liquid low-melting one, or to mix liquid components taken in amounts corresponding to the eutectic composition. Upon solidification of such a solution, an alloy is formed with a definite eutectic structure characteristic of it. In many cases, finding the eutectic temperature and the eutectic composition of the given components is an important practical problem.

Many attempts have been made to calculate the composition and melting temperature of eutectics as functions of the heat of fusion and the melting temperature of the components forming the alloy, and also as functions of the lattice energy and heat capacity \[1, 2\]. However, a reliable solution of the problem has not yet been found.

The most correct method remains the laborious one of constructing fusibility diagrams, which consists in taking cooling curves for a series of alloys of the given system at different concentrations of the components. In some cases even this method of finding the eutectic point of a system proves unacceptable, for example, in cases where, during melting of the components, transformations occur and complex systems are formed containing both the pure components and the products of their transformations \[3\].

A number of authors \[4, 5, 6\] have shown that, at the contact point of two crystals constituting a eutectic pair, a liquid phase appears.

N. S. Kurnakov and N. N. Efremov \[4\], carrying out experiments at room temperature (15°C), associated the appearance of liquid in an arbitrary mixture of crystals of methyl mustard oil ($t_{\text{m}} = 34^\circ$) and camphene ($t_{\text{m}} = 49.3^\circ$), which form a eutectic at $t = -8^\circ$, with the form of the fusibility diagrams of eutectic systems and with the considerable excess of the experimental temperature over the eutectic temperature.

It is seen from Fig. 1 that the region of existence of the liquid phase at the experimental temperature covers a certain interval of concentrations. With approxi-

as the temperature of the experiment approaches the eutectic temperature, this concentration interval becomes narrower. On this basis N. S. Kurnakov and N. N. Efremov concluded that the appearance of a liquid in a mixture of crystals of noneutectic composition is possible only when the temperature of the experiment considerably exceeds the eutectic temperature. For eutectic melting, however, a eutectic composition of the components or an already prepared eutectic structure is necessary.

The erroneousness of the above ideas was shown by the work of D. D. Saratovkin and P. A. Savintsev \[5, 7, 8\], who investigated eutectic pairs of organic substances and metals and showed that, for eutectic melting, simple contact of solid heterogeneous substances at a temperature only slightly exceeding the eutectic temperature is sufficient. The appearance of a liquid on the contact surface of the crystals was called contact melting \[7\]. The eutectic structure of an alloy always ensures contact of the components and, consequently, the conditions for contact melting. Thus, contact melting is also the cause of the low melting point of eutectics \[7\].

D. D. Saratovkin and P. A. Savintsev showed that the alloy formed during contact melting of metals is a eutectic alloy. Thus arose the “contact method” of obtaining a eutectic, a very simple and, it seemed, reliable one.

The contact method has found practical application as a method for detecting eutectic points of unstudied systems, chiefly systems formed by substances that decompose on heating to high temperatures \[8, 9, 10\], and also for detecting metastable eutectics \[3\]. It is considered \[11\] that, in speed of determination and ease of execution, the method of contact melting is the simplest of all existing methods for determining the melting temperature of eutectics, both in binary and in multicomponent systems.

The method of contact melting was used \[12\] to determine the eutectic points of systems whose components are inorganic salts and ice.

Thus:

  1. The phenomenon of contact melting was first discovered in substances forming systems with a eutectic.
  2. The phenomenon of contact melting has been studied in organic substances and metals that constitute eutectic systems.
  3. The phenomenon of contact melting has been used to detect eutectic points of unstudied systems formed by organic substances, certain inorganic salts, and metals.

It became widely accepted that contact melting is a feature of pairs of substances forming eutectic systems, i.e., mechanical mixtures.

Contact Melting of Alkali-Halide Crystals

Many physical properties of alloys of alkali-halide crystals are connected with the molecular interaction of the components. Molecular interaction is also manifested in the phenomenon of contact melting. Contact melting of alkali-halide compounds had not previously been observed; however, its study is of both theoretical and practical interest.

In the work of D. D. Saratovkin and P. A. Savintsev [13], eutectic (contact) melting is considered as a consequence of distortion of the lattice of one crystal at the point of its contact with the lattice of another crystal. Obviously, this factor should also manifest itself upon contact of certain substances possessing unlimited mutual solubility. In this case, contact melting should be expected for substances that form a series of solid solutions.

It is evidently necessary to determine whether contact melting is a general property of substances, and also to evaluate the method of contact melting as a method for detecting eutectic points.

We have carried out a study with alkali-halide salts of chemically pure grade.

  1. The powder of the more refractory component was melted and crystallized in a porcelain crucible. The less refractory component was crystallized in the form of a cylindrical rod in a special nickel mold. Then the cylindrical specimen was placed with its base on the surface of the first component, and the resulting system was placed in a crucible furnace. In this way continuous contact of the crystal surfaces was ensured during their heating. The temperature of the contact surface was measured during heating by means of a chromel–alumel thermocouple. At the same time, visual observation was carried out. The moment of appearance of liquid was recorded from the slowing of the temperature rise and visually. The liquid appeared at a temperature considerably lower than the melting temperature of the components.

In some experiments the crystals were heated separately to the temperature of contact melting and were then brought into contact. Liquid appeared only when the crystals were brought into contact.

The results of the study are given in Table 1.

It is clear from Table 1 that contact melting is observed for all the alkali-halide crystals studied, regardless of whether they form eutectic systems or a continuous series of solid solutions. The order of magnitude of the lowering of the melting temperature of the contacting surfaces relative to the melting temperatures of the pure components is approximately the same both for substances of the first group and for substances of the second group. For some systems the lowering of the temperature reaches several tens and hundreds of degrees.

  1. As was shown earlier, as a result of contact melting of substances constituting a system with a eutectic, a eutectic alloy is formed. To determine the character of the alloy obtained by the method of contact melting of substances forming solid solutions, we recorded Debye–Scherrer X-ray diffraction patterns of the alloys. Table 2 gives the diameters of the interference lines of the X-ray diffraction patterns of the alloy and of the components forming it. It is clear from Table 2 that the lines of the X-ray diffraction pattern are shifted both relative to the lines of KCl and relative to the lines of KBr. Consequently, the contact alloy KCl—KBr is a solid solution. Similar X-ray diffraction patterns were also obtained for the contact alloys KCl—NaBr, KBr—NaBr.

  2. From the data presented the following follows: contact melting is observed not only in alkali-halide crystals forming eutectics, but also in crystals forming solid solutions; consequently, by the method of contact melting it is impossible to resolve the question of mutual solubility of alkali-halide salts. As a result of their contact melting, both mechanical mixtures and solid solutions are formed.

Table 1

Temperature of contact melting of alkali-halide crystals

No. Component A Component B Melting temperature of components A Melting temperature of components B Temperature of contact melting Decrease in temperature relative to component A Decrease in temperature relative to component B System type
1 LiCl KCl 606 768 410 195 360 Eutectic systems
2 KCl NaF 768 995 665 100 330 Eutectic systems
3 KJ NaCl 686 800 555 130 245 Eutectic systems
4 KJ KBr 686 728 630 255 95 Eutectic systems
5 KJ KCl 686 768 545 140 220 Eutectic systems
6 NaCl NaF 800 995 680 120 315 Eutectic systems
7 NaCl LiF 800 870 665 135 205 Eutectic systems
8 KF NaF 980 995 740 240 255 Eutectic systems
9 LiF NaF 870 995 685 185 310 Eutectic systems
10 NaCl LiCl 800 606 585 215 20 Systems containing a chemical compound
11 NaCl KBr 800 728 680 140 90 Systems containing a chemical compound
12 KBr KCl 728 768 710 20 60 Systems forming solid solutions
13 KCl NaCl 768 800 660 110 140 Systems forming solid solutions
14 NaBr KCl 740 768 590 150 190 Systems forming solid solutions
15 KJ NaBr 686 740 500 185 240 Systems forming solid solutions
16 NaJ KJ 661 686 530 130 155 Systems forming solid solutions
17 KBr NaBr 728 740 620 110 120 Systems forming solid solutions
18 NaJ NaBr 661 740 586 75 155 Systems forming solid solutions
19 LiCl NaBr 606 740 530 75 210 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
20 LiCl NaJ 606 661 470 135 190 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
21 LiCl KF 606 980 575 30 405 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
22 NaBr KF 740 980 635 105 345 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
23 NaJ KBr 661 728 585 75 140 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
24 LiCl KBr 606 728 390 215 340 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
25 LiCl KJ 606 686 440 165 250 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
26 LiCl NaF 606 995 570 35 425 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
27 NaJ KCl 661 768 590 70 180 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
28 KCl LiF 768 870 710 60 160 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
29 KJ LiF 686 870 590 95 280 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
30 NaBr LiF 740 870 620 120 250 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown
31 KF LiF 980 870 600 380 270 Systems whose state diagrams are unknown

Contact Melting of Organic Substances

In the following series of experiments we discovered contact melting of organic substances capable of forming solid solutions. Para-chlorobromobenzene with para-nitrochlorobenzene form a continuous series of solid solutions with descending solidus and liquidus lines. A similar melting diagram also characterizes the solid solutions of para-iodobromobenzene with para-dibromobenzene.

Table 2

Distance between symmetrical interference lines of X-ray diffraction patterns of KCl, KBr, and their contact alloy

Substance Interference line no. 1 2 3 4
KBr 28.28 mm 39.75 46.70 48.84
contact alloy KBr—KCl 28.95 41.07 47 50.5
KCl 29.50 41.5 50.8 59.5

We measured the melting temperatures of the indicated substances, as well as the melting temperatures of mixtures of their powders taken in arbitrary ratios.

The temperature values are given in Table 3.

Table 3

Contact melting temperature of organic substances

No. Components Melting temperature Contact melting temperature Decrease in temperature relative to pure components
1 Para-chlorobromobenzene 62.5 59.5° 3°
1 Para-nitrochlorobenzene 82.5 59.5° 23°
2 Para-iodobromobenzene 88 83° 5°
2 Para-dibromobenzene 88 83° 5°

The lowering of the contact-melting temperature relative to the melting temperature of the pure components amounts approximately to from 5 to 27%, i.e., the effect of contact melting is manifested to a considerable degree.

Conclusions

  1. Contact melting has been discovered in alkali-halide crystals that form both eutectic systems and solid solutions.

  2. Contact melting has been discovered in organic substances forming a continuous series of solid solutions.

  3. The method of contact melting cannot be used, without additional investigations, to detect eutectic points of alkali-halide crystals.

  1. The use of the contact method for detecting eutectic points of organic substances is questionable, since on the basis of this method an erroneous conclusion may be drawn about the presence of a eutectic in a system that does not contain one.

  2. Contact melting is evidently observed in all pairs of substances that form systems with a descending liquidus line.

REFERENCES

  1. A. F. Kapustinskii, Tr. VNIIMS, vol. 109, 10, 1936.
  2. M. Usanovich, DAN SSSR, 112, No. 4, 1957.
  3. M. Kh. Gluzman, A. L. Gershuns, L. S. Palatnik, D. E. Plotkina, R. S. Milner. ZhFKh, 27, vol. 9, 1953.
  4. N. S. Kurnakov, N. N. Efremov. Izvestiya Petrogradskogo politekhnicheskogo instituta, 18, 1912.
  5. D. D. Saratovkin, P. A. Savintsev. DAN SSSR, 33, vol. 4, 1941; DAN SSSR, 80, vol. 4, 1951.
  6. S. V. Avakyan and N. F. Lashko, DAN SSSR, 65, No. 1, 1949.
  7. D. D. Saratovkin and P. A. Savintsev. DAN SSSR, 58, vol. 9, 1947.
  8. M. Kh. Gluzman, A. L. Gershuns, Ya. E. Geruzin. ZhPKh, 26, 1953.
  9. M. Kh. Gluzman, V. P. Rubtsova. ZhAKh, II, 1956.
  10. M. Kh. Gluzman, V. P. Rubtsova. Aptechnoe delo, No. 1, 15, 1957.
  11. M. Kh. Gluzman and V. P. Rubtsova. ZhOKh, 27, 3, 1957.
  12. V. B. Chernogorenko. ZhNKh, 1, 2, 1956.
  13. D. D. Saratovkin and P. A. Savintsev. Izvestiya TPI, 66, No. 3, 1948.

Errata

Page Line Printed Should read
3 11 from bottom \(10^{16}\) \(10^{-6}\)
9 2 from top \(5\cdot 10^{-9}\) sec \(5\cdot 10^{-9}\) sec
11 1 from top \(2 \div 3 \cdot 10_{3}\) sec \(2 \div 3\cdot 10^{-8}\) sec
29 6 from bottom \(10^{-6}\) cm/sec \(10^{6}\) cm/sec
29 2 from bottom large large
30 3 from top \(10^{-6}\) sec \(10^{-6}\) sec
32 6 from bottom cohesion cohesion
33 17 from top \(10^{-}\) sec \(10^{-8}\) sec
34 3 from top \(10^{6}\) sec \(10^{-6}\) sec
34 4, 5 from top \(10^{-4}\ldots 10^{-}\) sec \(10^{-4}\)--\(10^{-1}\) sec
34 19 from top \(10^{-8}\) and \(10^{-6}\) cm sec \(10^{-8}\) sec and \(10^{6}\) cm/sec
56 formula 9 At the end of the brace there should be \(-1\). At the end of the brace there should be \(-1\).
65 3 from bottom formula form
91 5 from top \(1350\) ohm and \(R_T = 30\) com \(R_T \cdot 1350\) ohm \(R_T \cdot 30\) com
107 6 from top \(\tau = 10^{-}\) sec \(\tau = 10^{-6}\) sec
108 16 from bottom samples microhardness of the samples
111 4 from bottom \(E\) \(E_{\mathrm{pr}}\)
112 Fig. 9, 5 from top field is homogeneous field is inhomogeneous
115 12 from bottom Winchell Winchell
123 7 from top cohesion cohesion
128 22 from top \(40\) mol % \(40\) mol %
170 1 from bottom tangent tangent
217 15 from bottom On introducing interstitial-type impurities On introducing impurities into solid solutions of the interstitial type
218 24 from top The dependence was measured The dependence was determined
219 8 from top chlorous ruby potassium bromide
219 22 from bottom storage from single crystals storage of single crystals
220 Fig. 2 At the origin on the axis \(\lg \sigma\) one should put \(-12\). At the origin on the axis \(\lg \sigma\) one should put \(-12\).
228 1 from bottom expression expression
228 5 from top then then
228 6 from top porcelain porcelain
228 7 from top framework in the framework
228 8 from bottom detailed detailed
228 16 from bottom coils coils
228 formula 3 \(C_g\) \(C_g\)
242 2 from bottom From Fig. 1 From the phase diagram
244 11--12 from bottom X-ray patterns are shifted X-ray patterns of the alloy are shifted
251 24 from top with ionized with ionized
301 7 from bottom ionizing ionizing
302 18 from bottom -percent 50-percent
306 9 from bottom \(95\%\) single crystal \(95\%\) density of the single crystal
325 24 from bottom group group II
332 6 from bottom \(10^{7}\)--\(10^{8}\) ohm-sec \(10^{7}\)--\(10^{8}\) cm/sec
343 1 from bottom "438-1" "IZV-1"
394 8 from bottom Co Co--

Publishing House of Technical and Theoretical Literature, vol. 95.

Submission history

Melting temperature of the contact layer of crystals