Abstract Generated abstract
The paper studies boundary behavior of harmonic and differentiable functions in spatial domains with angular points, especially cones and rectangular boxes. Using spherical logarithmic coordinates, Fourier series and Fourier integral representations with conical functions are derived for harmonic functions in truncated and full cones, and criteria are given linking finite Dirichlet integral to convergence conditions on Fourier coefficients. The main results establish sufficient and necessary type conditions for L2 boundary limits, modulus of continuity estimates, and preservation of smoothness from boundary data to harmonic extensions. Additional trace and extension theorems are proved for functions in Nikolsky type classes on a cube, including higher regularity cases under compatibility conditions at corner points.
Full Text
MATHEMATICS
G. V. ZHIDKOV
BOUNDARY PROPERTIES OF DIFFERENTIABLE AND HARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN DOMAINS WITH ANGULAR POINTS
(Presented by Academician S. L. Sobolev, 27 VI 1957)
Consider in space a conical domain \(G\), formed by rotating the ray \(r\) about the axis \(x\). Rectangular coordinates are related to spherical ones by the relations
\[ z = r \sin \theta \sin \varphi, \qquad y = r \sin \theta \cos \varphi, \qquad x = r \cos \theta, \]
\[ 0 < r < \infty, \qquad 0 < \theta \leq \pi, \qquad 0 < \varphi \leq 2\pi . \]
On the boundary \(\Gamma\) of the domain \(G\) a function is given,
\[ \psi(\rho,\varphi) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{r}} f(\rho,\varphi), \qquad r = e^\rho . \]
Let us construct a harmonic function \(V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)\) inside the domain \(G\). The Dirichlet integral in the coordinates \((\rho,\varphi,\theta)\) for the function \(V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)\) has the form
\[ D[V] = \iiint_G \left[ \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial \rho}\right)^2 + \frac{1}{\sin^2 \theta} \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial \varphi}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial \theta}\right)^2 \right] e^\rho \sin \theta \, d\rho \, d\varphi \, d\theta . \]
If the domain \(G\) is a cone bounded by two concentric spheres of radii \(r=1\) and \(r=e\), then the harmonic function has the form
\[ V(\rho,\varphi,\theta) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{e^\rho}} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \sin k\pi \rho \left[ A_{km}\cos m\varphi + B_{km}\sin m\varphi \right] \frac{K_k^m(\cos \theta)}{K_k^m(\cos \theta_0)}, \tag{1} \]
where \(0 \leq \rho \leq 1\), \(0 < \theta \leq \theta_0\), \(0 < \varphi \leq 2\pi\); \(K_k^m(\cos \theta)\) are conical functions (*). \(A_{km}\) and \(B_{km}\) are the Fourier coefficients of the function
\[ f(\rho,\varphi) \sim \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \sin k\pi \rho \left[ A_{km}\cos m\varphi + B_{km}\sin m\varphi \right]. \]
In the case where the domain \(G\) is a full cone with vertex at the origin, symmetric with respect to the axis \(x\), the harmonic function \(V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)\) is representable by the expression
\[ V(\rho,\varphi,\theta) = \frac{1}{2\pi \sqrt{e^\rho}} \sum_{m=0}^{\infty} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \cos k(\rho-\rho') \left[ a_m(\rho')\cos m\varphi + \right. \]
\[ \left. {}+ b_m(\rho')\sin m\varphi \right] \frac{K_k^m(\cos \theta)}{K_k^m(\cos \theta_0)} \, dk \, d\rho' . \tag{2} \]
where \(-\infty<\rho<\infty\); \(0<\theta<\theta_0\); \(0<\varphi<2\pi\). Let \(A_m(k)\) and \(B_m(k)\) denote the Fourier transforms of the coefficients \(a_m(\rho)\) and \(b_m(\rho)\) of the function
\[ f(\rho,\varphi)\sim \sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\{a_m(\rho)\cos m\varphi+b_m(\rho)\sin m\varphi\}. \]
Theorem 1. If a function \(V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)\), harmonic in the domain \(G\), satisfies the conditions:
\[ 1)\quad \iint_{\Gamma}|V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)|^2\,d\Gamma \leqslant N \quad \text{for all } \theta<\theta_0; \]
\[ 2)\quad D[V]<\infty, \]
then there exists a boundary function \(\psi(\rho,\varphi)\), summable in \(L_2\), for which
\[ \lim_{\theta\to\theta_0}\iint_{\Gamma}|V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)-\psi(\rho,\varphi)|^2\,d\Gamma=0 \]
and the condition
\[ \iint_{\Gamma}|\psi(\rho+h_1,\varphi+h_2)-\psi(\rho-h_1,\varphi-h_2)|^2\,d\Gamma \leqslant M\sum_{k=1}^{2}h_k^{1+\varepsilon} \]
is fulfilled, where \(\Gamma\) is the boundary of the domain \(G\); \(\varepsilon=0\); \(M\) is a constant independent of \(h_k\).
Theorem 2. If the boundary function \(\psi(\rho,\varphi)\) is summable in \(L_2\) and satisfies the condition
\[ \iint_{\Gamma}|\psi(\rho+h_1,\varphi+h_2)-\psi(\rho-h_1,\varphi-h_2)|^2\,d\Gamma \leqslant M\sum_{k=1}^{2}h_k^{1+\varepsilon}, \tag{3} \]
where \(\varepsilon>0\), then the harmonic function in the domain \(G\) corresponding to it has the following properties:
\[ 1)\quad V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)\ \text{is harmonic in }G\text{ for }\theta<\theta_0; \]
\[ 2)\quad \iint_{\Gamma}|V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)|^2\,d\Gamma \leqslant N \quad \text{for } \theta<\theta_0; \]
\[ 3)\quad \lim_{\theta\to\theta_0}\iint_{\Gamma}|V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)-\psi(\rho,\varphi)|^2\,d\Gamma=0; \]
\[ 4)\quad D[V]<\infty. \]
Theorem 3. If the boundary function \(\psi(\rho,\varphi)\) is summable in \(L_2\) and satisfies the condition
\[ \iint_{\Gamma}|\psi(\rho+h_1,\varphi+h_2)-\psi(\rho-h_1,\varphi-h_2)|^2\,d\Gamma \leqslant M_1\sum_{k=1}^{2}h_k^{2\alpha}, \]
then, for the corresponding harmonic function \(V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)\) in the domain \(G\),
\[ \iiint_{G}|V(\rho+h_1,\varphi+h_2,\theta+h_3)-V(\rho-h_1,\varphi-h_2,\theta-h_3)|^2\,dG \leqslant M_2\sum_{k=1}^{3}h_k^{2\alpha+1}, \]
where \(M_1\) and \(M_2\) are constants independent of \(h_k\).
In the proof of Theorems 1 and 2 it is shown that, if \(V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)\) is representable by expression (1), then the finiteness of \(D[V]\) is equivalent to the convergence of the series
\[ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}(k+m)(A_{km}^{2}+B_{km}^{2}). \tag{4} \]
From condition (3) of Theorem 2, the convergence of the series (4) is proved. If \(V(\rho,\varphi,\theta)\) is represented by formula (2), then the finiteness of \(D[V]\) is equivalent to the convergence of the series
\[ \sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}(m+k)'\,[A_m^2(k)+B_m^2(k)]\,dk. \tag{5} \]
It is shown that, from condition (3) of Theorem 2, in this case the convergence of the series (5) follows.
In the proof of Theorem 3, the idea of the proof of a theorem of S. N. Bernstein \((^4)\) is used.
Consider the domain \(G:\ 0\leq x,y,z\leq \pi\). A function \(f(x,y,z)\in H_P^r(G)\) induces on the boundary \(\Gamma\) of the domain \(G\) the function \(f|_\Gamma=\varphi\). In this case the following theorems are proved:
Theorem 4. If \(0<r-1/P<1\) and the function \(f\) belongs to the class \(H_P^r(G)\), then the boundary function \(\varphi\in H_P^{r-1/P}(\overline M)\), where \(\overline M<C\|f\|_{L_P(G)}^r\); \(C\) is a constant independent of \(\|f\|_{L_P(G)}^r\).
Theorem 5. If \(0<r-1/P<1\) and on the boundary \(\Gamma\) a function \(\varphi\) is given which belongs to the class \(H_P^{r-1/P}(M)\), then there exists a function \(f\) of the class \(H_P^r(G)\), defined in the domain \(G\), such that \(f|_\Gamma=\varphi\),
\[ \|f\|_{L_P(G)}^r<C\|\varphi\|_{L_P(\Gamma)}^r. \]
Under the imposition of a continuity condition on the even derivatives of the function \(\varphi\) at the corner points, Theorems 4 and 5 are proved in the case \(r-1/P>1^*\).
Moscow State University
named after M. V. Lomonosov
Received
25 VI 1957
REFERENCES
\({}^1\) E. Hobson, Trans. Cambr. Phil. Soc., 14, 211 (1889);
\({}^2\) F. G. Mehler, Math. Ann., 18, 161 (1881).
\({}^3\) S. M. Nikolsky, Matem. sborn., 33 (75), 2 (1953); 35; (77), 2 (1954).
\({}^4\) A. Zygmund, Trigonometric Series, 1939, p. 138.
\({}^5\) E. Titchmarsh, Introduction to the Theory of Fourier Integrals, 1948.
\({}^6\) S. L. Sobolev, Some Applications of Functional Analysis, L., 1950.
* For the definition of \(H_P^r(G)\), \(\|f\|_{L_P(G)}^r\), \(\|\varphi\|_{L_P(\Gamma)}^r\), see \((^3)\).