SOME INEQUALITIES FOR POLYNOMIALS OF A COMPLEX VARIABLE
Unknown
Submitted 1961-01-01 | SovietRxiv: ru-196101.56636 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

The note refines standard \(L^p\) norm inequalities for complex polynomials of degree \(n\) under the restriction that they have no zeros in the unit disk. Using de Bruijn’s Bernstein type inequality for the derivative on the unit circle, it proves an improved upper bound for \(\|Q_n(Re^{i\varphi})\|_p\) when \(R>1\), with an explicit gamma function constant and attention to the extremal case \(Q_n(z)=\lambda+\mu z^n\). It also establishes a corresponding local lower estimate for \(\|Q_n(\rho e^{i\varphi})\|_p\) as \(\rho\) approaches 1 from below, yielding as special cases earlier results of Ankeny and Rivlin for \(p=\infty\) and Rahman for \(p=1\).

Full Text

MATHEMATICS

I. I. Ibragimov and R. G. Mamedov

SOME INEQUALITIES FOR POLYNOMIALS OF A COMPLEX VARIABLE

(Presented by Academician V. I. Smirnov on 9 January 1961)

Let \(Q_n(z)=a_0z^n+a_1z^{n-1}+\cdots+a_n\) be a polynomial of degree \(n\). S. N. Bernstein \((^1)\) proved the following assertion:

If \(|Q_n(z)|\leq 1\) for \(|z|\leq 1\), then the inequality \(|Q'_n(z)|\leq n\) holds for \(|z|=1\).

Let

\[ \|Q_n(re^{i\varphi})\|_p= \left\{\int_0^{2\pi}|Q_n(re^{i\varphi})|^p\,d\varphi\right\}^{1/p}. \]

It is not difficult to show (for example, see \((^5)\)) that for any \(p\geq 1\) the inequalities

\[ \|Q_n(Re^{i\varphi})\|_p\leq R^n\|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p \quad (R>1); \tag{1} \]

\[ \|Q_n(\rho e^{i\varphi})\|_p\geq \rho^n\|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p \quad (\rho<1). \tag{2} \]

hold.

For polynomials \(Q_n(z)\) having no zeros inside the unit disk \(|z|<1\), de Bruijn \((^4)\) proved the following assertion:

Theorem A. If the polynomial \(Q_n(z)\) of degree \(n\) has no zeros in \(|z|<1\), then for any \(p\geq 1\) the inequality

\[ \|Q'_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p \leq \frac{n}{2} \left[ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}\,\Gamma\left(\frac12 p+1\right)} {\Gamma\left(\frac12(p+1)\right)} \right]^{1/p} \|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p . \tag{3} \]

In relation (3), the equality sign is attained only for polynomials of the form \(Q_n(z)=\lambda+\mu z^n\), where \(|\lambda|=|\mu|\).

In this note we refine inequalities (1) and (2) for polynomials \(Q_n(z)\) of degree \(n\) that have no zeros in \(|z|<1\).

Theorem 1. If \(Q_n(z)\) has no zeros in \(|z|<1\), then for \(p\geq 1\) the inequality

\[ \|Q_n(Re^{i\varphi})\|_p < \left\{ \frac12 \left[ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}\,\Gamma\left(\frac12 p+1\right)} {\Gamma\left(\frac12(p+1)\right)} \right]^{1/p} (R^n-1)+1 \right\} \|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p \tag{4} \]

holds for any \(R>1\).

Proof. Suppose first that \(Q_n(z)\ne \lambda+\mu z^n\), where \(|\lambda|=|\mu|\). From the obvious inequality

\[ |Q_n(Re^{i\varphi})| \leq \int_1^R |Q'_n(re^{i\varphi})|\,dr + |Q_n(e^{i\varphi})|, \]

where \(\varphi\) (\(0 \leqslant \varphi \leqslant 2\pi\)) is any number and \(R>1\), for any \(\rho \geqslant 1\), the inequality follows:
\[ \|Q_n(Re^{i\varphi})\|_p \leqslant \int_1^R \|Q_n'(re^{i\varphi})\|_p\,dr + \|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p . \]

Taking (1) into account, the last inequality may be written in the form
\[ \|Q_n(Re^{i\varphi})\|_p \leqslant \|Q_n'(e^{i\varphi})\|_p \int_1^R r^{\,n-1}\,dr + \|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p . \]

Hence, by Theorem A it follows that
\[ \|Q_n(Re^{i\varphi})\|_p < \left\{ \frac{n}{2} \left[ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(\frac12 p+1\right)} {\Gamma\left(\frac12(p+1)\right)} \right]^{1/p} \frac{R^n-1}{n} +1 \right\} \|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p, \]
i.e. (4) is valid.

It remains to verify the validity of (4) for polynomials of the form \(Q_n(z)=\lambda+\mu z^n\), where \(|\lambda|=|\mu|\). This follows from the inequality
\[ \|\lambda+\mu e^{i\varphi}R^n\|_p < (R^n-1)|\mu|(2\pi)^{1/p} + \|\lambda+\mu e^{i\varphi n}\|_p = \]
\[ = \left\{ \frac12 \left[ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(\frac12 p+1\right)} {\Gamma\left(\frac12(p+1)\right)} \right]^{1/p} (R^n-1) +1 \right\} \|\lambda+\mu z^n\|_p . \]

In the case \(p=\infty\), Theorem 1 was proved by Ankeny and Rivlin (3), and in the case \(p=1\), by Rahman (5).

Theorem 2. If \(Q_n(z)\) has no zeros in \(|z|<1\), then there exists a positive number \(\delta\) such that, for \((1-\delta)<\rho<1\), the inequality
\[ \|Q_n'(\rho e^{i\varphi})\|_p > \left\{ 1-\frac12 \left[ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(\frac12 p+1\right)} {\Gamma\left(\frac12(p+1)\right)} \right]^{1/p} (1-\rho^n) \right\} \|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p, \tag{5} \]
holds, where \(\rho \geqslant 1\) is any number.

Proof. The validity of inequality (5) for polynomials \(Q_n(z)=\lambda+\mu z^n\), where \(|\lambda|=|\mu|\), having no zeros in \(|z|<1\), is verified directly. Indeed,
\[ \|\lambda+\mu\rho^n e^{i\varphi n}\|_p > \|\lambda+\mu e^{i\varphi n}\|_p - (1-\rho^n)|\mu|(2\pi)^{1/p} = \]
\[ = \left\{ 1-\frac12 \left[ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(\frac12 p+1\right)} {\Gamma\left(\frac12(p+1)\right)} \right]^{1/p} (1-\rho^n) \right\} \|\lambda+\mu e^{i\varphi n}\|_p, \]
i.e. (5) is valid.

Now we prove the theorems for polynomials \(Q_n(z)\ne \lambda+\mu z^n\) of degree \(n\), where \(|\lambda|=|\mu|\), having no zeros in \(|z|<1\). For the proof suppose the contrary, i.e. that (5) does not hold. This means that there exists a polynomial \(Q_n(z)\ne \lambda+\mu z^n\) (\(|\lambda|=|\mu|\)) of degree \(n\), having no zeros in \(|z|<1\), and a sequence of values \(1-\delta<\rho_m<1\) \((m=1,2,\ldots)\) with
\(\lim\limits_{m\to\infty}\rho_m=1\), such that
\[ \|Q_n(\rho_m e^{i\varphi})\|_p \leqslant \left\{ 1-\frac12 \left[ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(\frac12 p+1\right)} {\Gamma\left(\frac12(p+1)\right)} \right]^{1/p} (1-\rho_m^n) \right\} \|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p . \tag{6} \]

Then
\[ \|Q_n'(e^{i\varphi})\|_p = \left\| \lim_{m\to\infty} \frac{Q_n(e^{i\varphi})-Q_n(\rho_m e^{i\varphi})} {e^{i\varphi}-\rho_m e^{i\varphi}} \right\|_p \geqslant \]
\[ \geqslant \lim_{m\to\infty} \frac{1}{1-\rho_m} \left( \|Q_n(e^{i\varphi})\|_p-\|Q_n(\rho_m e^{i\varphi})\|_p \right). \]

Hence, by virtue of (6), we have

\[ \begin{aligned} \left\|Q_n'\left(e^{i\varphi}\right)\right\|_p &\geq \frac{1}{2} \left[ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(\frac12 p+1\right)} {\Gamma\left(\frac12(p+1)\right)} \right]^{1/p} \left\|Q_n\left(e^{i\varphi}\right)\right\|_p \lim_{m\to\infty}\frac{1-\rho_m^n}{1-\rho_m} \\ &= \frac{n}{2} \left[ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma\left(\frac12 p+1\right)} {\Gamma\left(\frac12(p+1)\right)} \right]^{1/p} \left\|Q_n\left(e^{i\varphi}\right)\right\|_p, \end{aligned} \]

which contradicts Theorem A. Thus, inequality (5) is proved also for all \(Q_n(z)\ne \lambda+\mu z^n\), where \(|\lambda|=|\mu|\). For \(p=\infty\), it follows from Theorem 2 that if \(Q_n(z)\) has no zeros in \(|z|<1\) and \(\max_{|z|=1}|Q_n(z)|=1\), then there exists a positive number \(\delta>0\) such that

\[ \max_{|z|=\rho}|Q_n(z)|\geq \frac{1+\rho^n}{2} \]

for \(1-\delta<\rho<1\).

For \(p=1\), one theorem of Rahman follows from Theorem 2 \((^5)\).

Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics
Academy of Sciences of the Azerbaijan SSR

Received
5 I 1961

References

\(^1\) S. N. Bernstein, Extremal Properties of Polynomials, Moscow, 1947.
\(^2\) P. D. Lax, Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 50, 509 (1944).
\(^3\) N. C. Ankeny, T. J. Rivlin, Pacific J. Math., 5, 849 (1955).
\(^4\) N. G. de Bruijn, Nederl. Akad. Proc., 50, 1265 (1947).
\(^5\) Q. J. Rahman, Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 10, 800 (1959).

Submission history

SOME INEQUALITIES FOR POLYNOMIALS OF A COMPLEX VARIABLE