Static Bending Strength of Cast High-Speed Steels with Cobalt
Abstract Generated abstract
This study examines how cobalt content affects the static bending strength of cast high-speed steels intended for cutting-tool applications. Experimental heats with varying carbon, tungsten, chromium, vanadium, and cobalt contents were induction melted, titanium treated, centrifugally cast, tempered, and tested in static bending on small nonstandard specimens, with selected incompletely hardened steels additionally quenched before tempering. The results show that all investigated cast steels had lower bending strength than forged R18 steel, and that increasing cobalt content generally reduced strength. Among the alloy groups tested, the second group showed the highest strength, followed by the third, first, and fourth groups.
Full Text
STATIC BENDING STRENGTH OF CAST HIGH-SPEED STEELS WITH COBALT
V. A. Kashchuk
(Presented by Prof. Dr. A. N. Dobrovidov)
With each passing year, cobalt high-speed steels are finding ever broader application in the tool industry of the Soviet Union.
According to a number of studies [1—3], cobalt high-speed steel should be used as a material for high-productivity cast cutting tools.
Since the literature contains no reports on the influence of cobalt on the strength of cast high-speed steel, it is of definite practical and scientific interest to carry out such a study.
The experimental steels were melted in a high-frequency induction furnace in a crucible with a capacity of 2 kg. The heats were deoxidized with aluminum, at the rate of 1 g of aluminum per 1 kg of melt. To refine the structure of the castings, titanium (0.22%) was introduced into the steel in the form of ferrotitanium. Casting was carried out on a centrifugal machine into metal molds. The specimens had the form of plates with a cross section of \(5 \times 22\) mm.
The chemical composition of the steels studied is given in Table 1.
Static bending tests of the cast steels under study were carried out on a Gagarin mechanical press under a load of 1000 kg. The distance between supports was 36 mm. The cast plates were cut with an abrasive wheel into specimens which, after grinding, had a cross section of \(4.5 \times 4.5\) mm and a length of 52 mm.
The bending strength was calculated by the formula:
\[ \sigma_{\text{bend}}=\frac{3Pl}{2b^3}, \]
where \(P\) is the load in kg;
\(l\) is the length of the specimen between supports in mm;
\(b\) is the side of the specimen cross section in mm.
Five specimens from each heat were tested. Since most of the steels, during cooling in the metal mold, underwent hardening, before testing the specimens were subjected only to threefold tempering for 1 hour at \(560^\circ\). This tempering regime was chosen by us for convenience of comparison, since it is widely used in industrial practice.
Table 1
| No. | Heat No. | C | W | Cr | V | Co |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content of elements, %* | Content of elements, %* | Content of elements, %* | Content of elements, %* | Content of elements, %* | ||
| First group of steels | First group of steels | First group of steels | First group of steels | First group of steels | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0.75 | 18.90 | 4.01 | 1.30 | — |
| 2 | 2 | 0.88 | 19.14 | 4.80 | 1.37 | 6.16 |
| 3 | 3 | 0.87 | 18.70 | 4.89 | 1.40 | 10.57 |
| 4 | 4 | 0.85 | 19.18 | 4.87 | 1.28 | 17.77 |
| 5 | 5 | 0.87 | 19.03 | 4.74 | 1.38 | 20.99 |
| Second group of steels | Second group of steels | Second group of steels | Second group of steels | Second group of steels | ||
| 6 | 19 | 1.53 | 12.24 | 4.50 | 5.07 | — |
| 7 | 20 | 1.51 | 12.10 | 4.59 | 5.40 | 5.28 |
| 8 | 21 | 1.52 | 12.20 | 4.36 | 5.11 | 9.84 |
| 9 | 22 | 1.52 | 12.95 | 4.60 | 5.03 | 16.00 |
| 10 | 23 | 1.51 | 11.98 | 4.95 | 4.96 | 20.41 |
| 11 | 24 | 1.52 | 11.61 | 4.59 | 5.11 | 27.61 |
| Third group of steels | Third group of steels | Third group of steels | Third group of steels | Third group of steels | ||
| 12 | 8 | 1.55 | 19.35 | 5.52 | 5.01 | — |
| 13 | 9 | 1.53 | 20.49 | 5.65 | 4.94 | 5.65 |
| 14 | 10 | 1.49 | 19.82 | 5.58 | 5.21 | 12.48 |
| 15 | 11 | 1.61 | 20.54 | 5.48 | 5.25 | 16.00 |
| 16 | 12 | 1.50 | 20.18 | 5.20 | 4.83 | 20.41 |
| 17 | 13 | 1.47 | 20.14 | 5.46 | 4.91 | 26.81 |
| Fourth group of steels | Fourth group of steels | Fourth group of steels | Fourth group of steels | Fourth group of steels | ||
| 18 | 14 | 1.62 | 24.39 | 4.91 | 5.15 | — |
| 19 | 15 | 1.63 | 24.33 | 5.00 | 5.11 | 5.72 |
| 20 | 16 | 1.63 | 24.36 | 5.01 | 5.25 | 9.54 |
| 21 | 17 | 1.64 | 24.55 | 5.09 | 5.09 | 14.68 |
| 22 | 18 | 1.61 | 24.45 | 4.85 | 5.11 | 21.20 |
* Content: Mn < 0.4%; Si < 0.4%; S < 0.03%; P < 0.03%.
Specimens from steels of heats 8 and 14 did not acquire full hardening during cooling in the metal mold and therefore were additionally hardened from 1290°, and then tempered. These specimens were tested immediately after tempering, and also after hardening and tempering. The test results are given in Table 2.
Table 2
| No. | Heat No. | Heat-treatment regime | Hardness \(H_{RC}\) | Strength \(\sigma_{\text{bend}}\), kg/mm², specimen I | Strength \(\sigma_{\text{bend}}\), kg/mm², specimen II | Strength \(\sigma_{\text{bend}}\), kg/mm², specimen III | Strength \(\sigma_{\text{bend}}\), kg/mm², specimen IV | Strength \(\sigma_{\text{bend}}\), kg/mm², specimen V | Mean strength value \(\sigma_{\text{bend}}\), kg/mm² |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R18 forged | Normal for forged R18 | 64.0 | 258 | 291 | 276 | 309 | 281 | 283 |
Continuation of Table 2
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First group of steels | |||||||||
| 2 | 2 | Triple tempering for 1 hour at 560° | 66.5 | 187 | 225 | 203 | 152 | 163 | 186 |
| 3 | 3 | " | 67.5 | 142 | 149 | 124 | 204 | 206 | 165 |
| 4 | 4 | " | 69.0 | 111 | 184 | 203 | 149 | 138 | 157 |
| 5 | 5 | " | 69.0 | 157 | 102 | 198 | 148 | 130 | 147 |
| 6 | 6 | " | 69.0 | 158 | 83 | 91 | 117 | 166 | 123 |
| Second group of steels | |||||||||
| 7 | 19 | Triple tempering for 1 hour at 560° | 65.5 | 212 | 197 | 231 | 182 | 253 | 215 |
| 8 | 20 | " | 66.0 | 217 | 202 | 277 | 259 | 180 | 227 |
| 9 | 21 | " | 66.0 | 193 | 178 | 266 | 206 | 257 | 220 |
| 10 | 22 | " | 67.0 | 165 | 203 | 230 | 254 | 183 | 207 |
| 11 | 23 | " | 68.0 | 163 | 220 | 201 | 139 | 152 | 175 |
| 12 | 24 | " | 70.0 | 176 | 117 | 133 | 155 | 94 | 135 |
| Third group of steels | |||||||||
| 13 | 8 | " | 53.0 | 118 | 146 | 126 | 159 | 101 | 130 |
| 14 | 8 | Quenching from 1290°, triple tempering for 1 hour at 560° | 65.0 | 200 | 249 | 228 | 193 | 170 | 208 |
| 15 | 9 | Triple tempering for 1 hour at 560° | 65.0 | 161 | 194 | 137 | 122 | 176 | 158 |
| 16 | 10 | Triple tempering for 1 hour at 560° | 66.5 | 209 | 219 | 255 | 163 | 184 | 206 |
| 17 | 11 | " | 68.0 | 182 | 209 | 240 | 176 | 138 | 189 |
| 18 | 12 | " | 70.0 | 164 | 118 | 208 | 153 | 172 | 163 |
| Fourth group of steels | |||||||||
| 19 | 14 | Triple tempering for 1 hour at 560° | 55.0 | 113 | 93 | 104 | 144 | 161 | 123 |
| 20 | 14 | Quenching from 1290°, triple tempering for 1 hour at 560° | 65.5 | 161 | 109 | 181 | 134 | 100 | 137 |
| 21 | 15 | Triple tempering for 1 hour at 560° | 66.5 | 159 | 101 | 136 | 177 | 92 | 133 |
| 22 | 16 | " | 68.0 | 125 | 128 | 166 | 97 | 89 | 121 |
| 23 | 17 | " | 69.0 | 122 | 87 | 159 | 118 | 84 | 114 |
| 24 | 18 | " | 70.0 | 91 | 82 | 89 | 131 | 97 | 98 |
The tests were carried out on specimens of nonstandard dimensions and had as their main purpose a comparison, in strength, of experimental steels of different chemical composition.
Conclusions
-
All the cast steels investigated have a lower strength than forged steel R18.
-
As the cobalt content increases, the strength of the steels decreases.
-
The steels of the second group possess the greatest strength; those of the third group have lower strength; those of the first group still lower; and those of the fourth group the lowest.
Literature
-
Stroeva K. M. Scientific Works of the Novocherkassk Polytechnic Institute, pp. 413–427, vol. 26, Yerevan, 1955.
-
Dobrovidov A. N., Rozenberg A. M., and Yakovlev G. M. Machines and Tooling, pp. 15–16, No. 5, 1947.
-
Toteva N. D. Proceedings of the Tomsk Polytechnic Institute, vol. 68, issue 1, pp. 29–37, 1951.