Abstract Generated abstract
The paper develops embedding theorems for mixed norm and weighted classes of abstract functions obtained by viewing functions on Euclidean space as functions of separate vector variables. It defines analogues of Sobolev, weighted Sobolev, and Besov type spaces with two integrability exponents, including cases of integer and noninteger smoothness, and states embeddings between weighted half space classes, boundary Besov classes, and mixed norm fractional spaces. The main result proves an embedding from a classical fractional Sobolev space on a hyperplane into a mixed norm fractional space, using integral extension estimates, Hölder and Minkowski inequalities, and weighted derivative bounds. This establishes, for generalized fractional Sobolev spaces, a conjectured embedding principle associated with Sobolev and Nikol’skii.
Full Text
Doklady of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
1964. Volume 156, No. 5
MATHEMATICS
A. Kh. Gudiev
EMBEDDING THEOREMS FOR SOME CLASSES OF ABSTRACT FUNCTIONS
(Presented by Academician S. L. Sobolev on 23 I 1964)
We denote each point \(\mathbf{x}\) of the \(n\)-dimensional Euclidean space \(R^n\) in the form of a pair \((\mathbf{x}_{n-s}, \mathbf{x}_s)\), where \(\mathbf{x}_{n-s}(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_{n-s})\), \(\mathbf{x}_s(x_{n-s+1}, x_{n-s+2}, \ldots, x_n)\). In addition, let \(R^{n-s}\) be the \((n-s)\)-dimensional space of vectors \(\mathbf{x}_{n-s}\); \(R^s\) be the \(s\)-dimensional space of vectors \(\mathbf{x}_s\); \(\bar R^n_0\) be the half-space \(x_n \geqslant 0\); \(x(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_{n-1}) \in R^{n-1}\); \(\bar R^s_0\) be the half-space of points \(x_n \geqslant 0\); \((x_{n-s+1}; x_{n-s+2}, \ldots, x_{n-1}) \in R^{s-1}\).
We shall regard each function \(f(\mathbf{x})\), defined in \(R^n\), as a function of the vector variables \(\mathbf{x}_{n-s}\) and \(\mathbf{x}_s\). Under such consideration, to almost every vector \(\mathbf{x}^{(0)}_{n-s}\) there corresponds an element of a certain abstract space—the function \(f(\mathbf{x}^{(0)}_{n-s}, \mathbf{x}_s)\) of the variable vector \(\mathbf{x}_s\).
From the collection of abstract functions defined in this way one constructs the abstract classes:
\[
L^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0),\quad
W^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0),\quad
W^r_{(p_1,p_2)}(R^n),\quad
B^r_{(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)
\]
—analogues of the known classes \(L^l_{\alpha;p}\), \(W^l_{\alpha;p}\), \(W^r_p\), \(B^r_p\) \((^{1-7})\).
I. Definition of the classes \(L^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)\) (\(l\) an integer). We shall say that a function \(f(\mathbf{x})\) belongs to the class \(L^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)\) if:
a) \(f(\mathbf{x})\) has in \(\bar R^n_0\) all generalized derivatives of order \(l\);
b)
\[
\|f\|_{L^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)}
=
\left\{
\int_{R^{n-s}}
\left[
\int_{\bar R^s_0}
x_n^\alpha
\sum_{|\bar\alpha|=l}
|D^\alpha f|^{p_1}\,d\bar R^s_0
\right]^{p_2/p_1}
dR^{n-s}
\right\}^{1/p_2}
<\infty .
\]
II. Definition of the classes \(W^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)\). We shall say that a function \(f(\mathbf{x})\) belongs to \(W^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)\) if:
a) \(f(\mathbf{x}) \in L^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)\);
b) \(f(\mathbf{x}) \in L_{(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)\).
The norm in \(W^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)\) is defined by the equality
\[
\|f\|_{W^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)}
=
\|f\|_{L_{(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)}
+
\|f\|_{L^l_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}(\bar R^n_0)} .
\]
III. Definition of the classes \(W^r_{(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)\).
1) \(r\) an integer. Put \(\mathbf{r}(r,r,\ldots,r)\). We shall say that a function
\[
f(\mathbf{x}) \in W^r_{(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)
\]
if:
a) \(f(\mathbf{x}) \in L_{(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)\);
b) \(f(\mathbf{x}) \in L^r_{0;(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)\).
The norm in \(W^r_{(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)\) is defined by the equality
\[
\|f\|_{W^r_{(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)}
=
\|f\|_{L_{(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)}
+
\|f\|_{L^r_{0;(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)} .
\]
2) \(r\) nonintegral. Let \(r=\bar r+\alpha\), where \(0<\alpha<1\); \(1<p_1<\infty\). Put
\[
\mathbf{r}(\underbrace{r,\ldots,r}_{n-s},\underbrace{\bar r,\ldots,\bar r}_{s}).
\]
We shall say that a function \(f(\mathbf{x})\in W^r_{(p_1,p_2)}(R^n)\),
if
a) \(f(x)\in W_{(p_1,p_2)}^{\bar r}(R^n)\), where \(\bar r(\underbrace{\bar r,\bar r,\ldots,\bar r}_{n})\);
b)
\[
\left\|\vec D^{\beta}f\right\|_{\bar W_{(p_1,p_2)}^{-\alpha}(R^n)}
=
\sum_{j=n-s+1}^{n}
\left\{
\int_{R^{\,n-s}}
\left[
\int_{R^s}
\left(
\int_{0}^{\infty}
\frac{\left|\Delta_{j,h}D^{\vec\beta}f\right|^{p_1}}{h^{1+p_1\alpha}}\,dh
\right)dR^s
\right]^{p_2/p_1}
dR^{\,n-s}
\right\}^{1/p_2}<\infty,
\]
where
\[
\Delta_{j,h}D^{\vec\beta}f(x_1,\ldots,x_j+h,\ldots,x_n)
-
D^{\vec\beta}f(x_1,\ldots,x_j,\ldots,x_n);
\qquad |\vec\beta|=\bar r.
\]
We define the norm in \(W_{(p_1,p_2)}^{r}(R^n)\) by the equality
\[
\|f\|_{W_{(p_1,p_2)}^{r}(R^n)}
=
\|f\|_{W_{(p_1,p_2)}^{\bar r}(R^n)}
+
\sum_{|\vec\beta|=\bar r}
\left\|D^{\vec\beta}f\right\|_{\bar W_{(p_1,p_2)}^{-\alpha}(R^n)}.
\]
IV. Definition of the classes \(B_{(p_1,p_2)}^r(R^n)\).
1) \(r\) an integer. We shall say that \(f(x)\in B_{(p_1,p_2)}^r(R^n)\) if:
a) \(f(x)\in W_{(p_1,p_2)}^{\vec\gamma}(R^n)\), where \(\vec\gamma(\underbrace{r-1,r-1,\ldots,r-1}_{n})\);
b)
\[
\left\|D^{\vec\beta}f\right\|_{\bar B_{(p_1,p_2)}^{1}(R^n)}
=
\sum_{j=n-s+1}^{n}
\left\{
\int_{R^{\,n-s}}
\left[
\int_{R^s}
\left(
\int_{0}^{\infty}
\frac{\left|\Delta_{j,h}^{2}D^{\vec\beta}f\right|^{p_1}}{h^{1+p_1}}\,dh
\right)dR^s
\right]^{p_2/p_1}
dR^{\,n-s}
\right\}^{1/p_2}<\infty,
\]
where \(|\vec\beta|=r-1\);
\[
\Delta_{j,h}^{2}D^{\vec\beta}f
=
D^{\vec\beta}f(x_1,\ldots,x_j-h,\ldots,x_n)
-
2D^{\vec\beta}f(x_1,\ldots,x_j,\ldots,x_n)
+
D^{\vec\beta}f(x_1,\ldots,x_j+h,\ldots,x_n).
\]
We define the norm in \(B_{(p_1,p_2)}^r(R^n)\) by the equality
\[
\|f\|_{B_{(p_1,p_2)}^r(R^n)}
=
\|f\|_{W_{(p_1,p_2)}^{\vec\gamma}(R^n)}
+
\sum_{|\vec\beta|=r-1}
\left\|D^{\vec\beta}f\right\|_{\bar B_{(p_1,p_2)}^{1}(R^n)}.
\]
2) \(r\) noninteger. Put
\[
r(\underbrace{\bar r,\bar r,\ldots,\bar r}_{n-s},
\underbrace{r,r,\ldots,r}_{s}).
\]
In this case we shall assume that \(f(x)\in B_{(p_1,p_2)}^r(R^n)\) if \(f(x)\in W_{(p_1,p_2)}^{r}(R^n)\).
Theorem 1. If \(\alpha-kp_1+1>0\), then
\[
W_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}^{l}(\bar R_0^n)
\to
W_{\alpha-kp_1;(p_1,p_2)}^{\,l-k}(\bar R_0^n).
\]
Theorem 2. If \(\alpha-p_1l+1<0\), then
\[
W_{\alpha;(p_1,p_2)}^{l}(\bar R_0^n)
\to
B_{(p_1,p_2)}^{\vec\gamma}(R^{n-1}),
\]
where
\[
\vec\gamma\left(
\underbrace{\left[l-\frac{\alpha+1}{p_1}\right],\ldots,
\left[l-\frac{\alpha+1}{p_1}\right]}_{n-s},
\underbrace{l-\frac{\alpha+1}{p_1},\ldots,l-\frac{\alpha+1}{p_1}}_{s-1}
\right),
\]
\([\alpha]\) is the integer part of the number \(\alpha\).
Theorem 3. Let \(1\le m\le n-1,\quad 1<p<p_1<p_2<\infty\),
\[
r=l-\frac{n-1}{p}+\frac{m}{p_1}+\frac{n-m-1}{p_2};
\]
then
\[
W_p^l(R^{n-1})\to W_{(p_1,p_2)}^r(R^{n-1}),
\]
where \(r(\underbrace{\bar r,\ldots,\bar r}_{n-s},\underbrace{r,\ldots,r}_{s-1})\), \(l\) is nonintegral \(\bigl(W_{\alpha_1}^{\beta_1}\to W_{\alpha_2}^{\beta_2}\) denotes the embedding of \(W_{\alpha_1}^{\beta_1}\) in \(W_{\alpha_2}^{\beta_2}\) (see the survey article of S. M. Nikol’skii \((^8)\)\()\).
Theorems 1 and 2, as is not difficult to see, can be obtained from the corresponding theorems of S. V. Uspenskii \((^4)\).
We shall outline the proof of Theorem 3. Consider the function
\[ F=kx_n\int_{R^{n-1}}\frac{v(t,x_n)\,dt}{[(t-x)^2+x_n^2]^{n/2}}. \]
From the preceding theorems it follows that, in order to prove Theorem 3, it is sufficient to establish the validity of the inequality
\[ \|F\|_{L_{p_1(\nu-r)-1;(p_1,p_2)}^\nu(\bar R_0^n)} \leq c\|f\|_{W_p^l(R^{n-1})}. \tag{1} \]
Using the estimate
\[ |F^\nu(x,x_n)|\leq c \sum_{|\vec\alpha|\leq \nu}\int_{R^{n-1}} \frac{|v^\nu(t,x_n)|\,x_n}{[(t-x)^2+x_n^2]^{n/2}}\,dt+ \]
\[ +\,c\sum_{|\vec\alpha|\leq \nu-1}\int_{R^{n-1}} \frac{|v^{\nu-1}(t,x_n)|\,dt}{[(t-x)^2+x_n^2]^{n/2}} = c\left(\sum_{|\vec\alpha|\leq \alpha} I_{1,\vec\alpha} +\sum_{|\vec\alpha|\leq \alpha-1} I_{2,\vec\alpha}\right) \]
and Minkowski’s inequality, we obtain
\[ \|F\|_{L_{p_1(\nu-r)-1;(p_1,p_2)}^\nu(\bar R_0^n)} \leq c\left( \sum_{|\vec\alpha|\leq \nu} \|I_{1,\vec\alpha}\|_{L_{p_1(\nu-r)-1;(p_1,p_2)}^\nu(\bar R_0^n)} +\right. \]
\[ \left. +\sum_{|\vec\alpha|\leq \nu-1} \|I_{2,\vec\alpha}\|_{L_{p_1(\nu-r)-1;(p_1,p_2)}^\nu(\bar R_0^n)} \right). \tag{2} \]
Let us estimate one of the terms, for example
\[ \|I_{1,\vec\alpha}\|_{L_{p_1(\nu-r)-1;(p_1,p_2)}^\nu(\bar R_0^n)} = \]
\[ = c\left\{ \int_{R^{n-m-1}} \left[ \int_{\bar R_0^{m+1}} x_n^{p_1(\nu-r)-1} \left( \int_{R^{n-1}} \frac{|v^\nu(t,x_n)|\,x_n\,dt}{[(t-x)^2+x_n^2]^{n/2}} \right)^{p_1} d\bar R_0^{m+1} \right]^{p_2/p_1} dR^{n-m-1} \right\}^{1/p_2}. \]
Applying Hölder’s inequality and simplifying, we shall have
\[ \int_{\bar R_0^{m+1}} x_n^{p_1(\nu-r)-1} \left( \int_{R^{n-1}} \frac{|v^\nu(t,x_n)|\,x_n\,dt}{[(t-x)^2+x_n^2]^{n/2}} \,d\bar R_0^{m+1} \right)^{p_1} \leq \]
\[ \leq c\|f\|_{W_p^l}^{p_1-p} \int_{\bar R_0^{m+1}} x_n^k \left( \int_{R^{n-1}} \frac{|v^\nu|^p\,dt}{[(t-x)^2+x_n^2]^{n/2}} \right) d\bar R_0^{m+1}, \tag{3} \]
where \(k=p_1(l-r)+p(\nu-l)-(n-1)(p_1/p-1)\).
Taking (3) into account and making the necessary transformations, we obtain
\[ \|I_{1,\vec\alpha}\|_{L_{p_1(\nu-r)-1;(p_1,p_2)}^\nu(\bar R_0^n)} \leq \]
\[ \leq c\|f\|_{W_p^l}^{\,1-p/p_1} \left\{ \int_{R^{n-m-1}} \left[ \int_{\bar R^{m+1}} x_n^{k-(1-p_1/p_2)(n-m-1)} \left( \int_{R^{n-1}} \frac{|v^\nu|^p\,dt}{[(t-x)^2+x_n^2]^{n/2}} \right) d\bar R_0^{m+1} \right]\times \]
\[ \times \left[ \int_{\bar R_0^n} x_n^{p(\nu-l)-1}|v^\nu|^p\,d\bar R_0^n \right]^{(p_2-p_1)/p_1} dR^{n-m-1} \right\}^{1/p_2}. \]
The estimates hold:
\[
\int_{\overline{R}_0^n} x_n^{p(\nu-l)-1}\, |v^\nu(t,x_n)|^p\, d\overline{R}_0^n
\leq
c\|f\|_{W_p^l(R^{n-1})}^p,
\]
\[
\int_{R^{n-m-1}}
\left[
\int_{\overline{R}_0^{m+1}}
x_n^{k-(1-p_1/p_2)(n-m-1)}
\left(
\int_{R^{n-1}}
\frac{|v^\nu|^p\,dt}{\left[(t-x)^2+x_n^2\right]^{n/2}}
\right)
d\overline{R}_0^{m+1}
\right]
dR^{n-m-1}
\leq
\]
\[
\leq
\int_{\overline{R}_0^n}
x_n^{k-(1-p_1/p_2)(n-m-1)-1}\,
|v^\nu(t,x_n)|^p\,d\overline{R}_0^n
\leq
c\|f\|_{W_p^l(R^{n-1})}^p,
\]
therefore
\[
\left\| I_{1,\alpha}^{\to}\right\|_{L_{p_1(\nu-r)-1;(p_1,p_2)}^\nu(\overline{R}_0^n)}
\leq
c\|f\|_{W_p^l(R^{n-1})}.
\tag{4}
\]
Similarly one can show that
\[
\left\| I_{2,\alpha}^{\to}\right\|_{L_{(p_1(\nu-r)-1;(p_1,p_2))}^\nu(\overline{R}_0^n)}
\leq
c\|f\|_{W_p^l(R^{n-1})}.
\tag{5}
\]
From (2), (4), and (5) we obtain (1).
Hence it is not difficult to obtain the required result. Theorem 3 establishes the validity of the hypothesis of S. L. Sobolev and S. M. Nikol’skii for the generalized fractional spaces \(W_p^l\) of S. L. Sobolev. Works \((^9,\ ^{11},\ ^{12})\) are also devoted to this hypothesis.
Institute of Mathematics with Computing Center
of the Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
Received
13 I 1964
CITED LITERATURE
\(^1\) S. L. Sobolev, Some Applications of Functional Analysis in Mathematical Physics, Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1962.
\(^2\) L. D. Kudryavtsev, Proceedings of the V. A. Steklov Mathematical Institute, 55 (1959).
\(^3\) S. V. Uspenskii, Siberian Mathematical Journal, 3, No. 3 (1962).
\(^4\) S. V. Uspenskii, Proceedings of the V. A. Steklov Mathematical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 60, 282 (1961).
\(^5\) L. N. Slobodetskii, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 118, No. 2, 243 (1958).
\(^6\) O. V. Besov, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 126, No. 6, 1163 (1959).
\(^7\) V. P. Il’in, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 129, 983 (1959).
\(^8\) S. M. Nikol’skii, Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk, 16, issue 5 (101) (1961).
\(^9\) S. M. Nikol’skii, Siberian Mathematical Journal, 3, No. 6, 845 (1962).
\(^10\) S. N. Slobodetskii, Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk, 15, No. 3, 117 (1960).
\(^11\) A. Kh. Gudiev, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 147, No. 4 (1962).
\(^12\) A. Kh. Gudiev, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 149, No. 3 (1963).