On Boundary Value Problems for Partial Differential Equations with the Bessel Differential Operator
MATHEMATICS
Submitted 1964-01-01 | SovietRxiv: ru-196401.85216 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

This note studies boundary value problems for partial differential equations involving a differential Bessel operator in weighted Sobolev type spaces on half spaces and quadrant domains. It establishes trace theorems for derivatives defined through the operator x partial x and, equivalently in suitable cases, through powers of the Bessel operator, including converse extension results with norm estimates. The paper then defines B-ellipticity for higher order operators containing Bessel components and proves a priori estimates, uniqueness and solvability for constant coefficient equations, and coercive inequalities for variable coefficient operators with boundary operators satisfying the Lopatinskii condition. It also indicates extensions to higher dimensional settings using spherical coordinates and to related B-parabolic operators.

Full Text

Reports of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
1964, Volume 158, No. 2

MATHEMATICS

I. A. KIPRIYANOV

ON BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEMS FOR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH A DIFFERENTIAL BESSEL OPERATOR

(Presented by Academician I. N. Vekua on March 20, 1964)

In the theory of boundary-value problems for elliptic differential equations, a priori estimates of the norms of solutions of boundary-value problems in terms of the norms of the right-hand sides of the differential equation and the norms of the boundary conditions play a major role. Many interesting works are devoted to a priori estimates of solutions of elliptic equations (see, for example, \((^{3-5})\)).

In the present note, in the metrics of the corresponding weighted classes, a priori estimates are given for the norms of solutions of boundary-value problems for partial differential equations with a differential Bessel operator. For simplicity of exposition we restrict ourselves to the consideration of the half-space \(x \ge 0\) in the two-dimensional Euclidean space \(R_2\).

  1. Consider the set \(K_x\) of all functions \(f(x,y)\), each of which is infinitely differentiable, even in \(x\), and finite with respect to the set of variables \(x,y\). On this set we define the differential operator

\[ \mathscr{D}_x f=\frac{\partial f(x,y)}{x\,\partial x} \tag{1} \]

and powers of this operator

\[ \mathscr{D}_x^k f=\mathscr{D}_x\bigl(\mathscr{D}_x^{k-1}f\bigr). \tag{2} \]

The functional space \(W_{x,2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)\), where \(l\) is a nonnegative number, is defined as the closure of the set \(K_k\) of functions \(f(x,y)\) with respect to the norm

\[ \|f\|^2_{W_{x,2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)}. \]

The definitions of the norms \(\|f\|_{W_{x,2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)}\) and \(\|f\|_{W_{y,2,\gamma}^{(l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)}\) are given in work \((^7)\).

The functional space \(W_{x,y,2,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)\) is defined as the closure of the set \(K_x\) with respect to the norm

\[ \|f\|^2_{W_{x,y,2,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)} = \|f\|^2_{W_{x,2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)} + \|f\|^2_{W_{y,2,\gamma}^{(l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)}. \tag{3} \]

Here the index \(l\) takes not only positive integer values. The case \(\gamma=0\) is contained in note \((^1)\).

Let \(\{f_i\}\) be a sequence of functions belonging to \(K_x\), converging in the norm \(W_{x,y,2,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)\) to the function \(f(x)\). We shall say that the function

\[ \varphi^{(k)}=\left.\frac{\partial^k f}{(x,\partial x)^k}\right|_{x=0} \qquad (k\ge 0) \]

is the trace of the derivative \(\partial^k f/(x\partial x)^k\) at \(x=0\), if, as \(n\to\infty\),

\[ \left\| \varphi^{(k)} - \left.\frac{\partial^k f_n}{(x,\partial x)^k}\right|_{x=0} \right\|_{L_{2,\gamma}(R_1)} \to 0. \]

The following theorems on traces hold.

Theorem 1. Let \(f \in W_{x,y,2,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)\), and suppose that for nonnegative integers \(k\) the inequality

\[ \mu=\mu(k)=1-\frac{2k}{l}-\frac{2\gamma+1}{2l}>0 \tag{4} \]

is satisfied. Then there exist traces of the derivatives \(\partial^{k}f(x,y)/(x\partial x)^k\) on \(x=0\), and they belong to \(W_{y,2}^{(\bar l_1)}(R_1)\), \(\bar l_1=\mu l_1\). Moreover,

\[ \left\| \left. \frac{\partial^k f}{(x\partial x)^k} \right|_{x=0} \right\|_{W_{y,2}^{(\bar l_1)}(R_1)} \leqslant c\|f\|_{W_{x,y,2,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)}, \tag{5} \]

where the constant \(c\) does not depend on \(f\).

Remark. Here and below \(W_{y,2}^{(\bar l_1)}(R_1)\) denotes the usual Aronszajn–Slobodetskii space (see \((^2)\)).

The converse assertion also holds.

Theorem 2. Let nonnegative integers \(k\) be given for which the inequality

\[ \mu=\mu(k)=1-\frac{2k}{l}-\frac{2\gamma+1}{2l}>0 \tag{6} \]

is satisfied. For such \(k\), prescribe on \(R_1\) functions
\(\varphi^{(k)}(y)\in W_{y,2}^{(\bar l_1)}(R_1)\), with \(\bar l_2=\mu l_1\).

There exists a function \(\bar f\in W_{x,y,2,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)\) such that the \(\varphi^{(k)}\) are the traces of the corresponding \(\partial^k\bar f/(x\partial x)^k\) on \(x=0\), and

\[ \lim_{x\to 0} \left\| \frac{\partial^k\bar f}{(x\partial x)^k} - \varphi^{(k)}(y) \right\|_{W_{x,2}^{(\bar l_1)}(R_1)} =0 \tag{7} \]

for all admissible \(k\). Moreover,

\[ \|\bar f\|_{W_{x,y,2,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)} \leqslant c\sum_k \|\varphi^{(k)}(y)\|_{W_{y,2}^{(\bar l_1)}(R_1)} \tag{8} \]

with a constant \(c\) independent of \(\varphi^{(k)}\).

In constructing the space \(W_{x,2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)\) in the norm defined by formula (3), the differential operators of the form

\[ x^k\frac{\partial^k}{(x\partial x)^k} \qquad (k=1,2,\ldots,l) \tag{9} \]

are involved.

In the case when the number \(k\) is even and \(\gamma>0\), the indicated differential operators in the norm (3) may be replaced by the corresponding powers of the Bessel operator

\[ \mathfrak B_x=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} +\frac{2\gamma}{x}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \qquad (\gamma>0). \tag{10} \]

The norm thereby obtained will be equivalent to the former norm (3).

In exactly the same way, the trace theorems stated above can be formulated not only in terms of the operators \(\partial^k/(x\partial x)^k\), but also in terms of powers of the Bessel operator.

Let \(R_2^{(+,+)}\) denote the domain \(x\geqslant0,\ y\geqslant0\) of the two-dimensional Euclidean space \(R_2\). Define, similarly to the preceding, the functional space
\(W_{x,y,2,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(R_2^{(+,+)})\).

Theorem 3. Let \(f \in W_{x,y,z,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(R_2^{(+,+)})\), and suppose that for integer nonnegative numbers \(r\) the inequality

\[ \mu=\mu(r)=1-\frac{r}{l}-\frac{1}{2l}>0 \]

is satisfied.

Then the traces of the derivatives \(\partial^r f/\partial x^r\) on \(x=0\) exist and belong to
\[ W_{y,z,\gamma}^{(\bar l_1)}(R_1) \]
with \(\bar l_1=\mu l_1\). Moreover,

\[ \left\| \left. \frac{\partial^r f}{\partial x^r} \right|_{x=0} \right\|_{W_{y,z,\gamma}^{(\bar l_1)}(R_1)} \leq c\|f\|_{W_{x,y,z,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(R_2^{(+,+)})}, \]

where the constant \(c\) does not depend on \(f\).

As in the preceding case, the converse theorem is also true.

  1. Let \(\overset{+}{R}_2\) denote the half-plane \(x>0\) of the two-dimensional Euclidean space \(R_2\) of points \(z=(x,y)\). Let

\[ \mathscr L=\mathscr L\left(z;\mathfrak B_x,\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right) = \sum_{i=0}^{k} A^{(i,k)}(z)\mathfrak B_x^{\,k-i}\frac{\partial^{2i}}{\partial y^{2i}} + \sum_{\tau+2\nu\leq 2k-1} C^{(\tau,\nu)}(z)\mathfrak B_x^{\,\nu}\frac{\partial^\tau u}{\partial y^\tau} + D(z) \tag{11} \]

be a linear differential operator of order \(2k\), whose coefficients \(A^{(i,k)}(z)\), \(C^{(\tau,\nu)}(z)\), and \(D(z)\) are real functions of \(z\), defined in the closed domain \(\bar\Omega\) \((\overset{+}{R}_2=\Omega)\). Here, as above, \(\mathfrak B_x\) denotes the Bessel operator

\[ \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{2\gamma}{x}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \qquad(\gamma>0). \tag{12} \]

We shall say that the operator \(\mathscr L\) is \(B\)-elliptic in \(\Omega\), if for every \(z\in\bar\Omega\) and every real vector \(\alpha=(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)\) \((\alpha_1\geq 0)\) the inequality

\[ \left|\mathscr L_0\bigl(z;(i\alpha_1)^2,i\alpha_2\bigr)\right| \geq \delta|\alpha|^{2k}, \tag{13} \]

holds, where \(\delta\) is a positive number. The expression
\(\mathscr L_0\bigl(z;(i\alpha_1)^2,i\alpha_2\bigr)\) is obtained from
\(\mathscr L_0\left(z;\mathfrak B_x,\partial/\partial y\right)\) by replacing the symbol of the Bessel operator by the number \((i\alpha_1)^2\), and the symbol of differentiation \(\partial/\partial y\) by the number \(i\alpha_2\). The operator
\[ \mathscr L_0=\mathscr L_0\left(z;\mathfrak B_x,\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right) \]
has the form

\[ \mathscr L_0 = \mathscr L_0\left(z;\mathfrak B_x,\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\right) = \sum_{i=0}^{k} A^{(i,k)}(z)\mathfrak B_x^{\,k-i}\frac{\partial^{2i}}{\partial y^{2i}} \tag{14} \]

—the principal part of the operator \(\mathscr L\).

In what follows we shall consider the functional space
\[ W_{x,y,z,\gamma}^{(l,l_1)}(\overset{+}{R}_2) \]
in the case \(l=l_1\). Such spaces will be denoted by
\[ W_{2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\overset{+}{R}_2). \]
Here \(\overset{+}{R}_2\) will be understood to mean the closed domain.

Theorem 4. Let \(\mathscr L\) be a linear \(B\)-elliptic differential operator with constant coefficients, containing only differential operators of order \(2k\). Let the natural number \(l\geq 2k\), and let
\[ f\in W_{2,\gamma}^{(l-2k)}(\overset{+}{R}_2). \]
Then the equation \(\mathscr Lu+u=f\) has a unique solution
\[ u\in W_{2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\overset{+}{R}_2), \]
for which the inequality

\[ \|u\|_{W_{2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)} \leq c\|f\|_{W_{2,\gamma}^{(l-2k)}(\overset{+}{R}_2)} \tag{15} \]

holds, where \(c\) does not depend on \(f\).

Theorem 5. Let \(\mathcal L\) be a linear \(B\)-elliptic operator of order \(2k\), defined in \(\Omega\). Suppose that the coefficients of the operator have continuous and bounded corresponding derivatives up to order \(l-2k\), the leading coefficients are continuous in \(\Omega\), and let \(l\ge 2k\). Then for every \(u\in W_{2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\mathbb R_2^+)\) the inequality

\[ \|u\|_{W_{2,\gamma}^{(l)}(\mathbb R_2^+)} \le c\left[ \|\mathcal L u\|_{W_{2,\gamma}^{(l-2k)}(\mathbb R_2^+)} + \|u\|_{\mathcal L_{2,\gamma}(\mathbb R_2^+)} \right], \tag{16} \]

holds, where \(c\) does not depend on \(u\).

Theorem 6. Let \(\mathcal L\) be a linear \(B\)-elliptic operator of order \(2k\), defined in \(R_2^{(+,+)}\), and let \(R_\mu\) be differential operators of orders \(m_\mu\) \((\mu=1,2,\ldots,k)\), defined on \(x=0\) (on the part of the boundary of the domain \(R_2^{(+,+)}\)); moreover, let the operators \(\mathcal L\) and \(R_\mu\) satisfy the Lopatinskii condition on \(x=0\). Suppose \(l\ge 2k\) and the numbers \(m_\mu\le l-1\). Suppose that the coefficients of \(\mathcal L\) have continuous and bounded corresponding derivatives up to order \(l-2k\), and the coefficients of \(R_\mu\) have continuous and bounded derivatives up to the corresponding orders. The leading coefficients of \(\mathcal L\) and \(R_\mu\) are continuous in the corresponding closed domains. Then for every function \(u\in W_{2,\gamma}^{(l)}(R_2^{(+,+)})\) the inequality

\[ \|u\|_{W_{2,\gamma}^{(l)}(R_2^{(+,+)})} \le c\left[ \|\mathcal L u\|_{W_{2,\gamma}^{(l-2k)}(R_2^{(+,+)})} + \sum_{\mu=1}^{k} \|R_\mu u\|_{W_{2,\gamma}^{(l-m_\mu-1/2)}(S_2)} + \|u\|_{\mathcal L_{2,\gamma}(R_2^{(+,+)})} \right], \tag{17} \]

where \(c\) does not depend on \(u\), and \(S_2\) denotes the part of the boundary of the domain \(R_2^{(+,+)}\) corresponding to \(x=0\).

Represent \(R_n\) in the form \(R_n=R_m\times R_{n-m}\). Introduce in \(R_{n-m}\) spherical coordinates with origin at the point \(x_0^{(n-m)}\). Then any point \(x=(x_1,\ldots,x_n)\in R_n\) is represented in the form \(x=(x^{(m)},x_0^{(n-m)},\rho,\omega_{n-m})\). Let

\[ \mathcal L = \mathcal L\left(x;\frac{\partial}{\partial x_1},\ldots,\frac{\partial}{\partial x_m},\mathcal B_\rho\right) = \sum_{2j+r\le 2k} \sum_{i_1,\ldots,i_r=1}^{m} A^{(i_1,\ldots,i_r,j)}(x) \frac{\partial^r}{\partial x_{i_1}\cdots \partial x_{i_r}} \mathcal B_\rho^j \tag{18} \]

be a linear differential operator of order \(2k\), whose coefficients are real functions defined in \(R_n\). Here \(\mathcal B_\rho\) denotes the Bessel operator

\[ \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \rho^2} + \frac{2\gamma}{\rho} \frac{\partial}{\partial \rho} \qquad (\gamma>0). \]

We shall call the operator \(\mathcal L\) \(B\)-elliptic in \(R_n\) if, for every \(x\in R_n\) and every real vector \(\alpha=(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_m,\alpha_{m+1})\), the inequality

\[ \left| \mathcal L_0\left(x;i\alpha_1,\ldots,i\alpha_m,(i\alpha_{m+1})^2\right) \right| \ge \delta |\alpha|^{2k}, \]

holds, where \(\delta\) is a positive number and \(\mathcal L_0\) is the principal part of the operator \(\mathcal L\). For this operator, theorems of the type of Theorems 4 and 5 are also valid in terms of the space \(W_{x^{(m)},\rho,2,\gamma}^{l^{(m)},l}(R_n)\). We note that in other similar spaces one can also indicate \(B\)-elliptic operators with the corresponding coercivity inequalities. In accordance with what was indicated above, \(B\)-parabolic operators can also be considered.

Voronezh Technological Institute

Received
16 III 1964

REFERENCES

  1. I. A. Kipriyanov, DAN, 147, No. 3 (1962).
  2. L. N. Slobodetskii, Uch. zap. Leningradsk. gos. ped. inst. im. A. I. Herzen, 197 (1958).
  3. A. I. Koshelev, UMN, 13, 4 (82) (1958).
  4. S. Agmon, A. Douglis, L. Nirenberg, Estimates of solutions of elliptic equations near the boundary, Moscow, 1962.
  5. L. N. Slobodetskii, Vestn. LGU, 7 (1960).
  6. Ya. B. Lopatinskii, Ukr. matem. zhurn., 5, No. 2 (1953).
  7. I. A. Kipriyanov, DAN, 152, No. 1 (1963).

Submission history

On Boundary Value Problems for Partial Differential Equations with the Bessel Differential Operator