Exchange decomposition and changes in the isobaric potential in melts
Unknown
Submitted 1964-01-01 | SovietRxiv: ru-196401.97339 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

This paper examines how to determine the direction and relative irreversibility of exchange reactions in molten reciprocal salt systems. Using the Gibbs Helmholtz relation, with corrections for heating, melting, crystallization, heat capacities, and polymorphic transformations, the author calculates changes in isobaric potential for 42 ternary reciprocal systems at temperatures corresponding to the onset of crystallization at the central composition. The results indicate that the direction of exchange reactions is best characterized by a decrease in isobaric potential and generally agrees with known phase diagrams, while thermal effects alone give reliable qualitative predictions only under specified conditions. The paper also notes that systems involving complex compound formation require additional thermodynamic data, without which conclusions about reaction direction remain conditional.

Full Text

E. K. AKOPOV

EXCHANGE DECOMPOSITION AND THE CHANGE IN ISOBARIC POTENTIAL IN MELTS

(Presented by Academician S. I. Volfkovich, February 3, 1964)

To determine the direction of an exchange reaction in melts, there exist a number of empirical rules; among them the most widely used is the Beketov—Kablukov rule \((^{1,2})\). According to this rule, the exchange reaction proceeds in the direction of a positive thermal effect of the reaction, calculated at \(20\text{--}25^\circ\mathrm{C}\), which A. G. Bergman \((^3)\) called the “conditional thermal effect of the reaction of exchange of reciprocal pairs of salts.” The numerous diagrams of ternary reciprocal systems that have been studied, with some exceptions, confirm this rule. It has also been theoretically substantiated for a number of reciprocal systems by N. K. Voskresenskaya \((^4)\). I. N. Belyaev \((^5)\) based the theory of exchange decomposition on polarity, which characterizes the type of chemical bond of the compounds participating in the reactions.

Of interest is not only the finding of methods for determining the direction of an exchange reaction, but also the possibility of a preliminary judgment about the degree of its irreversibility, as well as about the chemical interaction of the components (complex formation). In determining the direction of an exchange reaction, the best indicator should be the change in isobaric potential, calculated at the corresponding reaction temperature. The isobaric potential is closely related to the constant of chemical equilibrium, from whose magnitude one can judge the degree of irreversibility of an exchange reaction. In addition, it has turned out that the equilibrium constant is closely related to the topological diagrams of reciprocal systems. This relation makes it possible to solve a number of questions in the theory of these systems.

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

In the present work, ternary reciprocal systems are considered, based on the exchange reaction expressed by the following equation

\[ \mathrm{AX} + \mathrm{BY} \to \mathrm{AY} + \mathrm{BX}, \tag{1} \]

where \(A, B\) are cations, and \(X, Y\) are anions.

The calculation of the change in isobaric potential of the exchange reaction \((\Delta Z)\) in reciprocal systems was carried out using the Gibbs—Helmholtz equation:

\[ \Delta Z = \Delta H - T \Delta S, \tag{2} \]

where \(\Delta H\) and \(\Delta S\) are, respectively, the change in enthalpy and entropy during the reaction, and \(T\) is the absolute temperature.

On the basis of Kirchhoff’s equation, and also taking into account the processes of melting and crystallization that occur during the exchange reaction, equation (2) may be written as follows:

\[ \Delta Z = \Delta H_{298} + \Delta H_{\mathrm{melt}} - T\Delta S_{298} - T\Delta S_{\mathrm{melt}} + \int_{298}^{T} \Delta C_p\, dT - T \int_{298}^{T} \frac{\Delta C_p}{T}\, dT, \tag{3} \]

where \(\Delta H_{298}\) and \(\Delta S_{298}\) are the changes in enthalpy and entropy at \(298^\circ\mathrm{K}\); \(\Delta H_{\mathrm{melt}}\) and \(\Delta S_{\mathrm{melt}}\) are the changes in the heat of melting (crystallization), \(\Delta C_p\) is the dif-

ness of the sums of the molar heat capacities of the products and starting substances of the reaction.

In the calculation, the heats and entropies of polymorphic transformations of the components were also taken into account.

The procedure for carrying out the thermodynamic calculations is as follows:
1) It is assumed that at the initial moment all four salts—\(AX\), \(BY\), \(BX\)—are present in an equivalent ratio. \(\Delta H_{298}\) and \(\Delta S_{298}\) were calculated

Table 1

No. Reaction \(T,\ ^\circ\mathrm{K}^*\) Change in enthalpy of the reaction at \(298^\circ\mathrm{K}\), \(\Delta H_{298}\), cal/g-equiv Change in enthalpy of the reaction at \(T\), \(\Delta H_T\), cal/g-equiv Change in entropy of the reaction at \(T\), \(\Delta S_T\), cal/g-equiv \(T\Delta S_T\) Change in isobaric potential of the reaction at \(T\), \(\Delta Z_T\), cal/g-equiv Source
1 \(2\mathrm{NaCl}+\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{KCl}+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 837 −90 −3928 −4.026 3369 −559 (14)
2 \(2\mathrm{NaNO}_3+\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{KNO}_3+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 838 −160 −6357 −6.9058 5787 −570 (15)
3 \(2\mathrm{NaBr}+\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{KBr}+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 851 −1120 −4751 −4.0175 3418 −733 (15)
4 \(\mathrm{NaNO}_3+\mathrm{KCl} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{KNO}_3+\mathrm{NaCl}\) 773 −70 −2253 −2.4805 1917 −346 (15)
5 \(\mathrm{NaBr}+\mathrm{KNO}_3 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{KBr}+\mathrm{NaNO}_3\) 723 −1060 149 1.5822 −1105 −956 (15)
6 \(\mathrm{KCl}+\mathrm{NaBr} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{NaCl}+\mathrm{KBr}\) 883 −1030 −1841 −0.79 697 −1148 (15)
7 \(\mathrm{NaJ}+\mathrm{KBr} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{NaBr}+\mathrm{KJ}\) 821 −2470 −1799 −0.2602 213 −1528 (15)
8 \(\mathrm{AgCl}+\mathrm{NaBr} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{AgBr}+\mathrm{NaCl}\) 923 −4918 −5915 −2.0107 1859 −4056 (15)
9 \(\mathrm{PbBr}_2+2\mathrm{TlCl} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{PbCl}_2+2\mathrm{TlBr}\) 649 −2260 −2003 −0.9105 590 −1413 (15)
10 \(\mathrm{PbCl}_2+2\mathrm{KBr} \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{KCl}+\mathrm{PbBr}_2\) 788 −720 −527 −0.2122 167 −360 (17)
11 \(2\mathrm{NaBr}+\mathrm{PbCl}_2 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{NaCl}+\mathrm{PbBr}_2\) 923 −1750 −2033 1.0661 701 −2734 (18)
12 \(\mathrm{KBr}+\mathrm{TlCl} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{TlBr}+\mathrm{KCl}\) 883 −2980 −1380 1.4086 −1243 −2623 (19)
13 \(\mathrm{AgCl}+\mathrm{KBr} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{AgBr}+\mathrm{KCl}\) 799 −3888 −3981 −1.296 1033 −2948 (15)
14 \(\mathrm{TlCl}+\mathrm{NaBr} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{NaCl}+\mathrm{TlBr}\) 900 −4010 −3411 0.24 −216 −3627 (20)
15 \(\mathrm{NaNO}_3+\mathrm{KF} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{NaF}+\mathrm{KNO}_3\) 1135 −7940 −13042 −8.2487 9362 −3680 (15)
16 \(\mathrm{KCl}+\mathrm{NaJ} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{NaCl}+\mathrm{KJ}\) 810 −4070 −4217 −1.19 936 −3283 (15)
17 \(\mathrm{KF}+\mathrm{NaCl} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{NaF}+\mathrm{KCl}\) 1036 −7870 −7906 −2.8646 2960 −4946 (15)
18 \(\mathrm{KF}+\mathrm{NaJ} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{NaF}+\mathrm{KJ}\) 1113 −11930 −12094 −4.1521 4621 −7473 (15)
19 \(\mathrm{KF}+\mathrm{NaBr} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{KBr}+\mathrm{NaF}\) 1059 −8900 −8606 −1.763 1867 −6739 (15)
20 \(\mathrm{NaJ}+\mathrm{KNO}_3 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{KJ}+\mathrm{NaNO}_3\) 725 −3990 −2496 0.4635 −336 −2832 (15)
21 \(2\mathrm{AgCl}+\mathrm{PbBr}_2 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{AgBr}+\mathrm{PbCl}_2\) 601 −3078 −3868 −2.3575 1416 −2502 (15)
22 \(2\mathrm{LiCl}+\mathrm{BrF}_2 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{LiF}+\mathrm{BaCl}_2\) 1020 −8580 −6566 −1.7462 1763 −4803 (15)
23 \(2\mathrm{NaF}+\mathrm{BCl}_2 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{BrF}_2+2\mathrm{NaCl}\) 1020 −2050 −3671 −1.2995 −1325 −4996 (15)
24 \(2\mathrm{NaF}+\mathrm{Li}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{LiF}+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 926 −4248 −5084 −4.309 3990 −1094 (15)
25 \(2\mathrm{LiF}+\mathrm{CaCl}_2 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{LiCl}+\mathrm{CaF}_2\) 1000 −1450 −3963 −0.232 232 −3731 (15)
26 \(2\mathrm{KJ}+\mathrm{PbCl}_2 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{PJJ}_2+2\mathrm{KCl}\) 828 −3405 −1390 3.2816 2682 −4107 (15)
27 \(2\mathrm{LiCl}+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{NaCl}+\mathrm{Li}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 900 −6445 −3404 1.16 −1044 −4448 (15)
28 \(\mathrm{CaCl}_2+\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{KCl}+\mathrm{CaSO}_4\) 1120 −9080 −7716 −1.9577 2204 −5512 (15)
29 \(\mathrm{LiCl}+\mathrm{NaNO}_3 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{NaCl}+\mathrm{LiNO}_3\) 773 −4710 −3501 −0.458 −265 −3766 (15)
30 \(2\mathrm{LiCl}+\mathrm{CaSO}_4 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{Li}_2\mathrm{SO}_4+\mathrm{CaCl}_2\) 1073 2650 −1039 4.048 −4382 −5382 (15)
31 \(2\mathrm{NaCl}+\mathrm{PbSO}_4 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{PbCl}_2+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_3\) 873 −345 −6100 −1.7114 1494 −4606 (15)
32 \(\mathrm{CdSO}_4+2\mathrm{NaCl} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{CaCl}_2+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 801 −3040 −5550 −1.2087 968 −4587 (15)
33 \(2\mathrm{KCl}+\mathrm{PbSO}_4 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4+\mathrm{PbCl}_2\) 904 −255 −3095 2.4095 −2178 −5273 (15)
34 \(2\mathrm{LiNO}_3+\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{KNO}_3+\mathrm{Li}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 770 −1805 −4666 −0.1671 129 −4557 (15)
35 \(2\mathrm{LiNO}_3+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{NaNO}_3+\mathrm{Li}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 720 −1465 −2546 5.7433 −4135 −4221 (15)
36 \(2\mathrm{NaF}+\mathrm{PbSO}_4 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{PbF}_2+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 873 1450 −6245 −1.034 902 −5343 (15)
37 \(\mathrm{CaCl}_2+\mathrm{BaF}_2 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{CaF}_2+\mathrm{BaCl}_2\) 1232 −9930 −9959 −1.321 1627 −8024 (15)
38 \(2\mathrm{KF}+\mathrm{Na}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{NaF}+\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 1031 −7780 −3997 3.4075 −3513 −7510 (15)
39 \(\mathrm{CaCl}_2+2\mathrm{NaF} \rightleftarrows \mathrm{CaF}_2+2\mathrm{NaCl}\) 1340 −11982 −11987 −1.446 1937 −10050 (15)
40 \(2\mathrm{LiCl}+\mathrm{K}_2\mathrm{SO}_4 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{KCl}+\mathrm{Li}_2\mathrm{SO}_4\) 845 −6440 −6363 3.7998 −3211 −9574 (15)
41 \(2\mathrm{KF}+\mathrm{CaCl}_2 \rightleftarrows \mathrm{CaF}_2+2\mathrm{KCl}\) 1260 −19850 −20670 −4.4438 5599 −15071 (15)
42 \(2\mathrm{KF}+\mathrm{BaCl}_2 \rightleftarrows 2\mathrm{KCl}+\mathrm{BaF}_2\) 1128 −9920 −11516 −1.383 1560 −9956 (15)

* \(T\)—temperature of the onset of crystallization of the composition at the point of intersection of the diagonals of the square of the reciprocal system.

from the heats of formation and absolute entropy values of the components under standard conditions, according to Hess’s law, on the basis of equation (1).

2) As the upper temperature limit, the temperature of the onset of crystallization of the composition at the point of intersection of the diagonals of the square of the reciprocal system was taken.

(Fig. 1). We shall denote this temperature by \(T\). The lower temperature limit is taken as \(298^\circ\) K.

3) The initial substances AX and BY are heated from \(298^\circ\) K to their melting, pass into the liquid state, and at temperature \(T\) the exchange reaction takes place with formation of the reaction products AY and BX, which crystallize from the melts.

We selected reciprocal systems for which the necessary calculation data are available in the literature. The heat capacities of salts were calculated from approximate equations for BaF\(_2\), PbCl\(_2\), TlCl, AgI, PbI\(_2\), the nitrates of Li, Na, K, taken from (\(^6\)); BaCl\(_2\), CaF\(_2\), KI, Na\(_2\)SO\(_4\), CaSO\(_4\) (\(^7\)); CaCl\(_2\), CdCl\(_2\), K\(_2\)SO\(_4\), PbSO\(_4\) (\(^8\)); LiF, NaF, KF, LiCl, NaF, KCl (\(^9\)); Li\(_2\)SO\(_4\) (\(^{10}\)); AgCl, NaBr, KBr, AgBr (\(^{11}\)).

The literature data on heats of formation (\(H_{298}\)), entropy (\(S_{298}\)), and heats of fusion for some compounds differ so much from one another that here we proceed from values taken mainly from (\(^{7-9}\)).

In calculating \(C_p\) for substances melting below the temperature of the exchange reaction, the heat capacities of the liquid state were also taken into account. In the absence of heat-capacity data, in some cases the temperature ranges of the \(C_p\) equation were somewhat extended.

The results of calculations for 42 reciprocal systems are given in Table 1. Analyzing the data of Table 1, the following conclusions may be drawn.

The best characteristic of reciprocal systems is the change in isobaric potential calculated at the temperature corresponding to the occurrence of the exchange reaction. The reaction is directed toward a decrease in the isobaric potential, which is in full agreement with the numerous studied diagrams of ternary reciprocal systems.

If the signs of the quantities \(\Delta H_{298}\) and \(\Delta H_T\) are the same, and the sign of \(T\Delta S\) coincides with the sign of \(\Delta H_T\), or the value of \(T\Delta S\) is smaller than the value of \(\Delta H_T\), then in reciprocal systems of the type considered the direction of the exchange reaction can be determined from the thermal effects, both \(\Delta H_{298}\) (“conditional”) and \(\Delta H_T\) (“actual”). In these cases Berthelot’s principle gives correct qualitative conclusions.

\(\Delta H_T\) characterizes reciprocal systems better than \(\Delta H_{298}\), contrary to the calculations of N. K. Voskresenskaya (\(^4\)). It should be assumed that the temperature \(\Delta T\) chosen by us and adopted in carrying out the calculations is apparently closer to the actual temperature.

In conclusion, we point out that in systems in which, along with the exchange reaction, reactions of formation of complex compounds also occur, it is necessary to take into account the thermal effects and entropy changes of the latter. For this, one must know the thermal effects and entropies of formation of complex compounds, data for which are absent for many reactions. In such systems, determination of the direction of the exchange reaction without taking into account the thermal effect and entropy of the complex compounds has a somewhat conditional character.

Krasnodar Polytechnic Institute

Received
1 II 1964

REFERENCES

  1. N. K. Beketov, In Memory of the 50th Anniversary of the Scientific Activity of N. N. Beketov, Kharkov, 1904.
  2. I. A. Kablukov, ZhRKhO, 37, 335 (1905); 39, 914 (1907).
  3. A. G. Bergman, Izv. sekt. fiz.-khim. anal., 19, 113 (1949).
  4. N. K. Voskresenskaya, Izv. sekt. fiz.-khim. anal., 18, 160 (1949); 19, 155 (1949).
  5. I. N. Belyaev, ZhNKh, 1, 1501 (1956).
  6. E. V. Britske, A. F. Kapustinskii et al., Thermal Constants of Inorganic Substances, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1949.
  7. Brief Handbook of Physicochemical Quantities, ed. by K. P. Mishchenko and A. A. Ravdel, Leningrad, 1959.
  8. V. I. Babushkin, G. M. Matveev, O. P. Mchedlov-Petrosyan, Thermodynamics of Silicates, Moscow, 1962.
  9. Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Substances, vol. 1, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1962, pp. 874, 903.
  10. N. K. Voskresenskaya, E. I. Banashek, Izv. sekt. fiz.-khim. anal., 25, 150 (1954).
  11. Chemist’s Handbook, vol. 1, 1963.
  12. E. K. Akopov, A. G. Bergman, ZhNKh, 4, 1653 (1959).
  13. N. K. Voskresenskaya et al., Handbook on the Fusibility of Systems of Anhydrous Inorganic Substances, vol. 2, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1960.
  14. R. N. Nyankovskaya, ZhNKh, 4, 2594 (1959).
  15. A. K. Bastandzhyan, I. I. Ilyasov, A. G. Bergman, ZhNKh, 4, 2079 (1959).

Submission history

Exchange decomposition and changes in the isobaric potential in melts