Abstract Generated abstract
This paper studies positivity, zeros, and lower estimates for sums of trigonometric series whose coefficients satisfy monotonicity and finite difference conditions. It generalizes earlier results of Fejér and others by replacing pointwise nonnegativity of higher differences with nonnegativity of certain alternating-parity tail sums of second, third, or fourth differences. Using transformations that express sine and cosine series through sums of squared sine factors with nonnegative coefficients, the paper characterizes the zeros of several series as common zeros of associated sine systems and derives explicit inequalities, including lower bounds for sine series and cosine series. Further results identify conditions under which a cosine series attains its minimum at odd multiples of pi and provide estimates for series over odd harmonics.
Full Text
Mathematics
I. N. Pak
On the Properties of Sums of Certain Sine and Cosine Series
(Presented by Academician V. I. Smirnov, 21 I 1965)
There exists a sine series \(S(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n \sin nx\) with \(b_n>b_{n+1}>0\) and \(b_n\to 0\) such that \(S(x)<0\) in \((\pi-l,\pi)\), \(l>0\). On the other hand, by Fejér’s theorem \((^1)\), \(S(x)>0\) on \((0,\pi)\) if \(\Delta^2 b_n \geq 0\) \((n=1,2,\ldots)\) and \(b_n\to 0\) \((b_1\ne 0)\). In \((^4)\) it was established that \(S(x)\geq 0\) on \((0,\pi)\) if \(b_n\downarrow 0\) and \(\beta_n=\Delta^2 b_n+\Delta^2 b_{n+2}+\cdots\geq 0\) \((n=1,2,\ldots)\); if at least one of the numbers \(\beta_1\) and \(\beta_2\) is positive, then \(S(x)>0\) on \((0,\pi)\), and a positive lower bound for \(S(x)\) on \((0,\pi)\) is given. These results are generalized in the following theorem.
Theorem 1. Let \(b_n\downarrow 0\) and
\[
\beta_n=\Delta^2 b_n+\Delta^2 b_{n+2}+\Delta^2 b_{n+4}+\cdots \geq 0
\]
\((n=1,2,\ldots)\). Denote by \(\{\beta_{n_k}\}\) \((k=1,2,\ldots)\) the subsequence formed from all positive elements of the sequence \(\{\beta_n\}\), preserving the former values of the indices \(n\). Then the sum
\[
S(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n \sin nx \geq 0
\]
and vanishes on \((0,\pi)\) at exactly those points which are common zeros of the system of functions
\[
\left\{\sin \frac{n_k}{2}x\right\}\quad (k=1,2,\ldots).
\tag{1}
\]
The numbers \(\beta_n\) cannot all be equal to zero if \(b_1\ne 0\). Clearly, the system (1) has no common zeros on \((0,\pi)\) if at least one of the numbers \(\beta_1\) or \(\beta_2\) is positive, since in this case, respectively, \(\sin x/2\) or \(\sin x\) has no zeros on \((0,\pi)\). The numbers \(\beta_1\) and \(\beta_2\) cannot simultaneously be equal to zero if \(b_n\to 0\), \(\Delta^2 b_n\geq 0\), and \(S(x)\ne 0\).
We note that there exists a sine series whose coefficients satisfy the conditions of Theorem 1, and whose sum vanishes at a point lying inside the interval \((0,\pi)\).
The proof of Theorem 1 is based on the representation
\[
S(x)=2\operatorname{ctg}\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\beta_n \sin^2\left(\frac{n_k}{2}x\right),
\tag{2}
\]
which is derived from formula (5) \((^5)\).
If \(\beta_n\geq 0\) for \(n\geq N+1\), then for any \(m\geq N\) and \(0<x<\pi\) it is true that
\[
S(x)\geq 2\operatorname{ctg}\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\sum_{n=1}^{m}\beta_n \sin^2\left(\frac{n}{2}x\right).
\tag{3}
\]
Let, for example, \(b_n=1/n^2\). Then all \(\beta_n>0\). For definiteness, putting \(m=2\) in (3), we obtain:
\[
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\sin nx}{n^2}
>
\left(\frac{\pi^2}{6}-1\right)\sin x+
\left(7-\frac{2}{3}\pi^2\right)\sin x\cos^2\left(\frac{x}{2}\right),
\quad 0<x<\pi.
\]
Consider the cosine series \(C_1(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n \cos(2n-1)x\) (it may diverge at \(x=0\)). The function \(C_1(x)\) is even; moreover, \(C_1(x)=-C_1(\pi-x)\). Therefore it suffices to study \(C_1(x)\) for \(0<x<\pi/2\). If \(\Delta^3 a_n\geqslant 0\) \((n=1,2,\ldots)\) and \(a_n\to 0\), then it is known \((^1)\) that \(C_1(x)>0\) on \((0,\pi/2)\). (Moreover, \(C_1(x)\) decreases monotonically on \((0,\pi/2)\).) On the other hand, there exists a cosine series \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n\cos(2n-1)x\) with \(\Delta^2 a_n\geqslant 0\) and \(a_n\to 0\), whose sum \(C_1(x)<0\) on \((\pi/2-\varepsilon,\pi)\), \(\varepsilon>0\). In \((^6)\) it was established that \(C_1(x)\geqslant 0\) on \((0,\pi/2)\), if \(a_n\downarrow 0\) and
\(\Delta^3a_n+\Delta^3a_{n+2}+\Delta^3a_{n+4}+\cdots\geqslant 0\) \((n=1,2,\ldots)\).
In Theorem 2 these results are generalized.
Theorem 2. Let \(a_n\downarrow 0\) and
\[
\alpha_n=\Delta^3a_n+\Delta^3a_{n+2}+\Delta^3a_{n+4}+\cdots\geqslant 0
\]
\((n=1,2,\ldots)\). Denote by \(\{a_{n_k}\}\) \((k=1,2,\ldots)\) the subsequence consisting of all positive elements of \(\{a_n\}\), with the former values of the indices \(n\) preserved. Then the sum \(C_1(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n\cos(2n-\)
\[
-1)x\geqslant 0
\]
and vanishes on \((0,\pi/2)\) at those and only those points which are common zeros of the system
\[
\{\sin n_kx\}\qquad (k=1,2,\ldots).
\tag{4}
\]
In particular, if at least one of the numbers \(\alpha_1\) or \(\alpha_2\) is positive, then the system (4) has no common zeros on \((0,\pi/2)\), since neither \(\sin x\) nor \(\sin 2x\) has zeros on \((0,\pi/2)\). The numbers \(\alpha_1\) and \(\alpha_2\) cannot vanish simultaneously if \(\Delta^3a_n\geqslant 0\) \((n=1,2,\ldots)\), \(a_n\to 0\), and \(C_1(x)\ne 0\).
Theorem 2 is proved on the basis of the transformation
\[
C_1(x)=\cos x\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\alpha_{n_k}\frac{\sin^2(n_kx)}{\sin^2 x}.
\tag{5}
\]
Theorem 3. If \(a_n\to 0\), \(\Delta^2a_n\geqslant 0\),
\[
p_n=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(k+1)\Delta^4a_{n+2k}\geqslant 0
\]
for \(n\geqslant N+1\), then for any integer \(m\geqslant N\)
\[
C(x)\geqslant C(\pi)+2\operatorname{ctg}^2\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\sum_{n=1}^{m}p_n\sin^2\left(\frac{n}{2}x\right),
\tag{6}
\]
where
\[
C(x)=\frac{a_0}{2}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_n\cos nx.
\]
If \(m=\infty\), then (6) becomes an equality.
The proof of Theorem 3 is based on the transformation
\[
C(x)=C(\pi)+\operatorname{ctg}\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\Delta d_n\sin nx,
\]
where \(\Delta d_n=\Delta^2a_n+\Delta^2a_{n+2}+\cdots\) \((^5)\), with the use of (3).
The conditions of Theorem 3 are certainly fulfilled if \(a_n\downarrow 0\) and
\[
\Delta^4a_n+\Delta^4a_{n+2}+\Delta^4a_{n+4}+\cdots\geqslant 0
\]
\((n\geqslant N+1)\).
Let \(N=0\). Then \(p_n\geqslant 0\) \((n=1,2,\ldots)\). If \(C(x)\ne\mathrm{const}\), then not all \(p_n\) can be equal to zero. In this case \(C(x)\) attains its least value at the points \(x=\pi\pmod{2\pi}\). Consequently, \(C(x)\geqslant C(\pi)\). This result is known \((^1)\), but under stronger restrictions: \(\Delta^4a_n\geqslant 0\) \((n=1,2,\ldots)\) and \(a_n\to 0\).
It is known \((^3)\) that \(C(x)\geqslant 0\), if \(\Delta^2a_n\geqslant 0\) \((n=0,1,2,\ldots)\) and \(a_n\to 0\). Under the conditions of Theorem 3 (for \(N=0\)) it turns out that \(C(x)\geqslant 0\) also for
\(\Delta^2 a_0 < 0\), but nevertheless it must be that
\(\Delta^2 a_0 > -(\Delta^2 a_2 + \Delta^2 a_4 + \Delta^2 a_6 + \ldots)\) (the expression in parentheses is positive, if the case \(a_n \equiv 0\) \((n=2,3,\ldots)\) is excluded).
Remark. Let \(a_n \to 0\), \(\Delta^2 a_n \geqslant 0\), and \(p_n \geqslant 0\) for \(n=2,3,\ldots\). Then, for any integer \(k \geqslant 1\),
\[ C(x) \leqslant C(\pi) + \operatorname{ctg}\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\Delta a_n \sin nx -2\operatorname{ctg}^2\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)\sum_{n=1}^{k} p_{n+1}\sin^2\left(\frac{n}{2}x\right). \]
If \(k=\infty\), then this inequality becomes an equality.
Theorem 4. If \(b_n \to 0\) and \(\Delta^2 b_n \geqslant 0\) for \(n \geqslant N+1\), then for any integer \(m \geqslant N\) and \(0<x<\pi\),
\[ S_1(x) \geqslant \frac{b_1}{2}\sin x +\frac{1}{2\sin x}\sum_{n=1}^{m}\left(\Delta^2 b_n+4\beta_{n+1}\cos^2 x\right)\sin^2(nx), \tag{7} \]
where
\[ S_1(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n\sin(2n-1)x \quad\text{and}\quad \beta_{n+1}=\Delta^2 b_{n+1}+\Delta^2 b_{n+3}+\Delta^2 b_{n+5}+\ldots \]
If \(m=\infty\), then (7) becomes an equality.
For example, putting \(m=1\) in (7), we find
\[ S_1(x)\geqslant \frac{b_1}{2}\sin x +\frac{1}{2}\left(\Delta^2 b_1+4\beta_2\cos^2 x\right)\sin x \quad (0\leqslant x\leqslant \pi). \]
Electrotechnical Institute of Communications
named after M. A. Bonch-Bruevich
Received
19 I 1965
REFERENCES
\(^{1}\) L. Fejér, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 39, 18 (1936).
\(^{2}\) N. K. Bari, Trigonometric Series, Moscow, 1961.
\(^{3}\) W. H. Young, Proc. London Math. Soc., 12, 41 (1913).
\(^{4}\) I. N. Pak, DAN, 151, No. 1, 38 (1963).
\(^{5}\) I. N. Pak, Vestn. Leningrad Univ., No. 7 (1963).
\(^{6}\) I. N. Pak, Tr. uchebn. institutov svyazi, issue 12 (1963).