Abstract Generated abstract
This paper investigates the reaction of hexaalkyldistannoxanes with acetylenic compounds containing active hydrogen atoms, motivated by earlier observations that organotin oxygen compounds differ markedly from organic and organosilicon analogs. The authors show that these distannoxanes readily form acetylenic stannanes and stannanols, with reaction course depending on reagent ratios and conditions, and that excess acetylene or more severe conditions can lead to bis(trialkylstannyl)acetylenes or related products. The work discusses reversibility, disproportionation of trialkylethynylstannanes, relative reactivity of acetylenic hydrogen in carbon, silicon, and tin analogs, and proposes a donor acceptor mechanism involving proton attack at oxygen and interaction of the acetylenic bond with tin. Preparative examples and physicochemical constants are reported for numerous synthesized organotin acetylene derivatives.
Full Text
CHEMISTRY
Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR M. F. SHOSTAKOVSKII, N. V. KOMAROV, I. S. GUSEVA, V. K. MISIONAS, A. M. SKLYANOVA, T. D. BURNASHOVA
INTERACTION OF ACETYLENES WITH HEXAALKYLDISTANNOXANES
Earlier we \((^{1-5})\) showed that stannanols and dialkylolovooxy compounds differ sharply in the corresponding reactions from their organic and organosilicon analogs.
In this connection it was of considerable interest to investigate the interaction of hexaalkyldistannoxanes with acetylenic compounds.
The investigation showed that hexaalkyldistannoxanes, in contrast to the corresponding organic and organosilicon analogs, readily enter into reaction with acetylenic compounds containing an active hydrogen atom and form acetylenic stannanes and stannanols.
\[ \mathrm{R_3SnOSnR_3 + HC \equiv CR' \rightarrow R_3SnC \equiv CR' + R_3SnOH,} \tag{I} \]
where
\[ \mathrm{R—CH_3,\ C_2H_5,\ C_3H_7,\ C_4H_9\ and\ others.} \]
\[ \mathrm{R'—H,\ Na,\ CH{=}CH_2,\ C{\equiv}CH,\ (CH_3)_3C,\ (CH_3)_3Si,\ C_6H_5,\ -\overset{\displaystyle |}{\underset{\displaystyle |}{C}}OH,} \]
\[ \mathrm{-\overset{\displaystyle |}{\underset{\displaystyle |}{C}}OCH(OR)CH_3,\ C(=O)-R,\ CH{=}CHOR,\ CH{=}CHNR_2\ and\ others.} \]
The reaction proceeds autocatalytically.
It is interesting to note that, under ordinary conditions and with an equimolecular ratio of the reagents, the reaction proceeds mainly according to scheme (I). However, in accordance with the fact established earlier by us \((^{5-8})\), in the presence of an excess of the acetylenic component and under more severe conditions, further interaction of the stannanols formed with acetylenes takes place. Owing to this ability, the indicated reaction becomes controllable and can be carried out either according to scheme (I) or according to scheme (II).
\[ \mathrm{R_3SnOSnR_3 + 2R'C \equiv CH \rightarrow 2R_3SnC \equiv CR' + H_2O.} \tag{II} \]
In the case of the interaction of hexaalkyldistannoxanes with acetylene, together with trialkylethynylstannanes there are obtained, in insignificant amounts, bis-(trialkylstannyl)acetylenes. The most probable reason for the formation of the latter is the interaction of acetylene simultaneously with two molecules of hexaalkyldistannoxane
\[ \mathrm{2R_3SnOSnR_3 + HC \equiv CH \rightarrow R_3SnC \equiv CSnR_3 + 2R_3SnOH.} \tag{III} \]
Formation of bis-(trialkylstannyl)acetylenes is also possible on the basis of the disproportionation reaction of trialkylethynylstannanes
\[ \mathrm{2R_3SnC \equiv CH \rightarrow R_3SnC \equiv CSnR_3 + HC \equiv CH.} \tag{IV} \]
Disproportionation of the latter was observed by us upon heating them with hexaalkyldistannoxanes or upon distillation of a mixture of these substances. Hexaalkyldistannoxanes exert a catalytic action on the disproportionation reaction of trialkylethynylstannanes. An exceptional feature of trialkylethynylstannanes is their reduced reac-
tional ability, manifested in the fact that they do not enter into the reaction of direct interaction with hexaalkyldistannoxanes and do not form bis-(trialkylstannyl)-acetylenes in this way. Meanwhile, analogously constructed carbon and silicon compounds do enter into this reaction
\[ \mathrm{R_3XC \equiv CH + R'_3SnOSnR_3 \to R_3XC \equiv CSnR'_3 + R'_3SnOH,} \]
where R and R′ are CH₃ and C₂H₅; X is C and Si.
According to the reactivity of the hydrogen atoms in monosubstituted acetylenes in this reaction, the latter may be arranged in the following series:
\[ \mathrm{R_3SiC \equiv CH > R_3C{-}C \equiv CH > R_3SnC \equiv CH.} \]
A similar regularity was also observed by us in other chemical reactions, as well as in the study of the IR spectra of the indicated compounds (⁹).
The low activity of acetylenic hydrogen and the weak strength of the tin–acetylene bond of trialkylethynylstannanes are apparently the main reason why the interaction of ethynylstannanes with trialkylstannanols proceeds contrary to the previously established direction (⁵), according to the scheme
\[ \mathrm{R_3SnC \equiv CH + R'_3SnOH \to R_3SnOSnR'_3 + HC \equiv CH.} \]
Because of this feature of ethynylstannanes, the reaction of hexaalkyldistannoxanes with acetylene is reversible
\[ \mathrm{R_3SnOSnR_3 + HC \equiv CH \rightleftarrows R_3SnC \equiv CH + R_3SnOH.} \]
The interaction of hexaalkyldistannoxanes with sodium acetylide led to the formation only of bis-(trialkylstannyl)-acetylenes.
\[ \mathrm{R_3SnOSnR_3 + HC \equiv CNa \to R_3SnC \equiv CSnR_3 + NaOH.} \]
The formation of acetylenic organotin compounds in the interaction of hexaalkyldistannoxanes with acetylenes, apparently, as in the case of stannanols, is associated with donor–acceptor interaction of the lone electrons of the oxygen atom with the proton and of the π-electrons of the acetylenic bond with vacant \(5d\)-orbitals of the tin atom
\[ \mathrm{ R_3SnOSnR_3 + HC \equiv CR' \to \left[ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{R_3SnO\,SnR_3}\\ \mathrm{\ \ \ \ \downarrow\ \uparrow}\\ \mathrm{HC \equiv CR'} \end{array} \right] \to R_3SnC \equiv CR' + R_3SnOH. } \]
At the basis of the mechanism of the reaction under study, the principal role probably belongs to electrophilic proton attack on the oxygen atom and to interaction with the acetylenic anion
\[ \mathrm{ [R'C \equiv C{:}]^{(-)}H^{(+)} + R_3SnOSnR_3 \to \left[ \begin{array}{c} \mathrm{\ \ \ SnR_3}\\ \mathrm{\ \ (+)/}\\ \mathrm{H{-}O}\\ \mathrm{\ \ \backslash}\\ \mathrm{\ \ \ SnR_3} \end{array} \right] \xrightarrow{\mathrm{R'C \equiv C^{(-)}}} R_3SnC \equiv CR' + R_3SnOH. } \]
The features and mechanism of this reaction are being studied. The physicochemical constants of the synthesized compounds are presented in Table 1.
Trimethylethynylstannane. Into a test-tube autoclave are placed 24 g of hexamethyldistannoxane, and it is saturated with acetylene under a pressure of 8–12 atm. The autoclave is discharged, the liquid phase is separated from the crystalline phase and distilled. This gives 8.6 g (65.5%) of trimethylethynylstannane with b.p. 98°/745 mm, 58°/150 mm; \(n_D^{20}\) 1.4626, \(d_4^{20}\) 1.3602. \(MR\) found 38.2, calculated 39.27.
\[ \mathrm{C_5H_{11}Sn.} \quad \begin{array}{ll} \text{Found, \%:} & \mathrm{C\ 31.51;\ H\ 5.8;\ Sn\ 62.72}\\ \text{Calculated, \%:} & \mathrm{C\ 31.8;\ H\ 5.34;\ Sn\ 62.86} \end{array} \]
In addition, 7.5 g of hexamethyldistannoxane with b.p. 130–131°/150 mm and 8.5 g of trimethylstannanol with m.p. 117° are isolated.
Table 1
Physicochemical constants of the synthesized compounds
| No. | Compound formula | b.p., °C | Pressure, mm | $n_D^{20}$ | $d_4^{20}$ | $MR_D$ found | $MR_D$ calc. | C, % found | C, % calc. | H, % found | H, % calc. | Sn, % found | Sn, % calc. | Yield, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $(\mathrm{CH_3})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 58 | 150 | 1.4626 | 1.3602 | 38.20 | 39.27 | 31.51 | 31.8 | 5.18 | 5.34 | 62.72 | 62.86 | 65 |
| 2 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 49—50 | 15 | 1.4770 | 1.2458 | 52.37 | 53.21 | 41.79 | 41.61 | 7.19 | 6.99 | 51.42 | 51.41 | 64 |
| 3 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_3H_7})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 67 | 2 | 1.4780 | 1.1545 | 66.95 | 67.16 | 48.53 | 48.39 | 8.01 | 8.12 | 43.28 | 43.45 | 50 |
| 4 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_4H_9})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 98—99 | 2.5 | 1.4765 | 1.1038 | 80.55 | 81.61 | 53.53 | 53.39 | 8.92 | 8.95 | 37.32 | 37.67 | 47 |
| 5 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{C}{-}\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 60 | 1 | 1.5262 | 1.2626 | 61.98 | 60.95 | 47.45 | 47.50 | 6.31 | 6.33 | 47.04 | 46.56 | 50 |
| 6 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_3H_7})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{C}{-}\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 103 | 1 | 1.5110 | 1.1343 | 78.42 | 74.84 | 51.83 | 52.57 | 7.84 | 7.46 | 38.81 | 39.96 | 30 |
| 7 | $(\mathrm{CH_3})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{CSn}(\mathrm{CH_3})_3$ | 102 | 23 | m.p. | 58° | — | — | 27.44 | 27.32 | 5.05 | 5.16 | 67.78 | 67.52 | 97 |
| 8 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{C}{-}\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CSn}(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3$ | 156 | 0.5 | 1.5483 | 1.3646 | 107.05 | 105.53 | 42.40 | 41.79 | 6.58 | 6.57 | 52.1 | 51.62 | 46 |
| 9 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{CC}(\mathrm{CH_3})_3$ | 59 | 1.5 | 1.4710 | 1.1162 | 71.87 | 71.80 | 50.43 | 50.21 | 8.35 | 8.43 | 41.72 | 41.36 | 25 |
| 10 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{CSi}(\mathrm{CH_3})_3$ | 107 | 9 | 1.4805 | 1.1450 | — | — | 43.30 | 43.70 | 7.85 | 7.94 | — | — | 44 |
| 11 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_3H_7})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{CC_6H_5}$ | 150 | 1 | 1.5388 | 1.1811 | 92.53 | 93.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 70 |
| 12 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnOCH_2C}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 80—81 | 5 | 1.4660 | 1.2870 | 58.92 | 60.01 | 41.7 | 41.5 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 44.8 | 45.7 | 31 |
| 13 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnOCH}(\mathrm{CH_3})\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 73 | 3 | 1.4830 | 1.2375 | 63.45 | 64.28 | 43.39 | 43.68 | 7.25 | 7.31 | 43.12 | 43.17 | 40 |
| 14 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnOC}(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{H}$ | 83 | 2 | 1.4755 | 1.1851 | 68.59 | 69.27 | 45.48 | 45.71 | 8.02 | 7.67 | 41.47 | 41.07 | 26 |
| 15 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_3H_7})_3\mathrm{SnOCH}(\mathrm{CH_3})\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 92 | 1 | 1.4785 | 1.1544 | 77.80 | 78.17 | 49.61 | 49.24 | 8.39 | 8.26 | 37.04 | 37.44 | 17 |
| 16 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_3H_7})_3\mathrm{SnOC}(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 109 | 4 | 1.4735 | 1.1169 | 83.22 | 82.80 | 51.04 | 50.79 | 8.32 | 8.51 | 35.34 | 35.85 | 10 |
| 17 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_4H_9})_3\mathrm{SnOCH}(\mathrm{CH_3})\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 117 | 3 | 1.4785 | 1.1109 | 91.58 | 92.16 | 53.64 | 53.51 | 8.97 | 8.97 | 33.06 | 33.05 | 68 |
| 18 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_4H_9})_3\mathrm{SnOC}(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CH}$ | 118 | 2 | 1.4740 | 1.0867 | 96.69 | 98.56 | 54.65 | 54.71 | 9.22 | 9.18 | 31.85 | 31.81 | 31 |
| 19 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnOCH_2C}\equiv\mathrm{CSn}(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3$ | 160 | 5 | 1.5145 | 1.3541 | 103.18 | 103.7 | 38.40 | 38.60 | 6.70 | 6.88 | 51.40 | 51.20 | 81 |
| 20 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnOCH}(\mathrm{CH_3})\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CSn}(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3$ | 132 | 1 | 1.5060 | 1.3242 | 107.56 | 108.32 | 39.43 | 40.06 | 7.11 | 7.14 | 49.84 | 49.48 | 70 |
| 21 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnOC}(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CSn}(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3$ | 138 | 2 | 1.5005 | 1.2969 | 112.09 | 112.96 | 41.02 | 41.34 | 7.43 | 7.35 | 47.91 | 48.09 | 77 |
| 22 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_3H_7})_3\mathrm{SnOCH}(\mathrm{CH_3})\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CSn}(\mathrm{C_3H_7}\text{-}n)_3$ | 165 | 1 | 1.4970 | 1.2139 | 135.95 | 136.11 | 46.99 | 46.81 | 8.04 | 8.22 | 41.58 | 42.02 | 52 |
| 23 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_3H_7})_3\mathrm{SnOC}(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CSn}(\mathrm{C_3H_7}\text{-}n)_3$ | 172 | 4 | 1.4925 | 1.2073 | 139.01 | 139.74 | 47.92 | 47.78 | 8.27 | 8.37 | 41.22 | 41.07 | 73 |
| 24 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_4H_9})_3\mathrm{SnOCH}(\mathrm{CH_3})\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CSn}(\mathrm{C_4H_9}\text{-}n)_3$ | 200 | 3 | 1.4875 | 1.1558 | — | — | 51.42 | 51.88 | 8.94 | 9.02 | 36.98 | 36.62 | 12 |
| 25 | $(n\text{-}\mathrm{C_4H_9})_3\mathrm{SnOC}(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{C}\equiv\mathrm{CSn}(\mathrm{C_4H_9}\text{-}n)_3$ | 198 | 2 | 1.4890 | 1.1277 | 169.49 | 168.62 | 51.98 | 52.50 | 9.12 | 9.05 | 35.60 | 35.84 | 63 |
| 26 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{C}{-}\mathrm{CH}{=}\mathrm{CHOC_4H_9}$ | 107—108 | 0.5 | 1.5098 | 1.1760 | 83.65 | 82.40 | 51.10 | 51.10 | 7.98 | 7.96 | 35.27 | 35.07 | 98 |
| 27 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{C}{-}\mathrm{CH}(\mathrm{CH_3})\mathrm{OCH}(\mathrm{OC_4H_9})\mathrm{CH_3}$ | 120 | 2 | 1.4722 | 1.1075 | 94.84 | 94.41 | 51.09 | 51.24 | 8.41 | 8.54 | 31.77 | 31.68 | 70 |
| 28 | $(\mathrm{C_2H_5})_3\mathrm{SnC}\equiv\mathrm{C}{-}\mathrm{C}(\mathrm{CH_3})_2\mathrm{OCH}(\mathrm{OC_4H_9})\mathrm{CH_3}$ | 112 | 1.5 | 1.4670 | 1.0727 | 100.6 | 99.24 | 52.40 | 52.48 | 8.76 | 8.75 | 30.60 | 30.54 | 62 |
Bis-(tri-n-propylstannyl)acetylene. To 2.32 g (0.048 gram-mole) of sodium acetylide in 15 ml of abs. ether, with stirring, is added a solution of 24.6 g (0.048 gram-mole) of hexa-n-propyldistannoxane in 25 ml of ether. The organic layer is separated from the precipitate and distilled. This gives 24.6 g (92%) of bis-(tri-n-propylstannyl)acetylene with b.p. 188–189°/6 mm, $n_D^{20}$ 1.5040, $d_4^{20}$ 1.2461. Found $MR$ 122.7, calculated 123.09.
\[ \mathrm{C}_{20}\mathrm{H}_{42}\mathrm{Sn}_2. \quad \begin{aligned} &\text{Found \%: } &&\mathrm{Sn}\ 45.92\\ &\text{Calculated \%: } &&\mathrm{Sn}\ 45.64 \end{aligned} \]
In addition, 1.1 g of tri-n-propylstannylstannane is isolated, with b.p. 78°/4 mm, $n_D^{20}$ 1.4780.
Triethylstannyldiacetylene. To a solution of 15.5 g of diacetylene in 70 ml of abs. ether, cooled to −20, −30°, 52 g of hexaethyldistannoxane is gradually added, and the mixture is left overnight and distilled. This gives 15.5 g (50%) of triethylstannyldiacetylene with b.p. 60°/1 mm, $n_D^{20}$ 1.5262, $d_4^{20}$ 1.2626. $MR$ found 61.98, calculated 60.95.
\[ \mathrm{C}_{10}\mathrm{H}_{16}\mathrm{Sn}. \quad \begin{aligned} &\text{Found \%: } &&\mathrm{C}\ 47.45;\ \mathrm{H}\ 6.31;\ \mathrm{Sn}\ 44.04\\ &\text{Calculated \%: } &&\mathrm{C}\ 47.50;\ \mathrm{H}\ 6.33;\ \mathrm{Sn}\ 46.56 \end{aligned} \]
In addition, 26.1 g (46.4%) of bis-(triethylstannyl)diacetylene is isolated, with b.p. 156°/0.5 mm, $n_D^{20}$ 1.5483, $d^{20}$ 1.3646. $MR$ found 107.5, calculated 105.53.
\[ \mathrm{C}_{16}\mathrm{H}_{30}\mathrm{Sn}_2. \quad \begin{aligned} &\text{Found \%: } &&\mathrm{C}\ 42.40;\ \mathrm{H}\ 6.58;\ \mathrm{Sn}\ 52.1\\ &\text{Calculated \%: } &&\mathrm{C}\ 41.79;\ \mathrm{H}\ 6.57;\ \mathrm{Sn}\ 51.62 \end{aligned} \]
Triethylstannylethynylvinyldiethylamine. In an apparatus with a Dean–Stark trap are placed 11.7 g (0.27 gram-mole) of hexaethyldistannoxane, 6.1 g (0.05 gram-mole) of ethynylvinyldiethylamine, and 50 ml of benzene, and the mixture is heated until the water and benzene have been completely removed. On distillation, 6.59 g (80%) of the substance is obtained, with b.p. 125–126°/1.5 mm; $n_D^{20}$ 1.5470, $d_4^{20}$ 1.1648.
\[ \begin{aligned} &\text{Found \%: } &&\mathrm{C}\ 51.10;\ \mathrm{H}\ 7.96;\ \mathrm{Sn}\ 35.94;\ \mathrm{N}\ 4.1\\ &\text{Calculated \%: } &&\mathrm{C}\ 51.22;\ \mathrm{H}\ 8.28;\ \mathrm{Sn}\ 36.2;\ \mathrm{N}\ 4.27 \end{aligned} \]
Interaction of hexaethyldistannoxane with triethylethynylstannane. A mixture of 5.5 g (0.013 gram-mole) of hexaethyldistannoxane and 3 g (0.013 gram-mole) of triethylethynylstannane is stirred for 10 hours and distilled. This gives 5.2 g of ethyldistannoxane with b.p. 150–151°/3 mm, $n_D^{20}$ 1.5010, and 2.3 g of bis-(triethylstannyl)acetylene with b.p. 155–156°/13 mm, $n_D^{20}$ 1.5080.
Interaction of triethylethynylstannane with triethylstannanol. Into a flask fitted with a magnetic stirrer and a gas outlet tube connected to a cylinder for measuring gas are placed 3.6 g (0.016 g/mole) of triethylstannanol, and 3.7 g (0.016 gram-mole) of triethylethynylstannane is added. Evolution of acetylene (360 ml) begins immediately. This gives 6.5 g (98%) of hexaethyldistannoxane with b.p. 145–146°/12 mm, $n_D^{20}$ 1.4990.
Irkutsk Institute of Organic Chemistry
Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR
Received
6 I 1965
REFERENCES
- M. F. Shostakovskii, N. V. Komarov, V. K. Misyunas, Izv. AN SSSR, OKhN, 1962, 368.
- N. V. Komarov, M. F. Shostakovskii, V. K. Misyunas, Author’s Certificate No. 163176 (1964).
- M. F. Shostakovskii, N. V. Komarov et al., Izv. AN SSSR, ser. khim., 1964, 1102.
- M. F. Shostakovskii, N. V. Komarov et al., DAN, 161, No. 2 (1965).
- M. F. Shostakovskii, N. V. Komarov et al., DAN, 158, 918 (1964).
- N. V. Komarov, M. F. Shostakovskii, I. S. Guseva, Author’s Certificate No. 158573 (1963).
- M. F. Shostakovskii, N. V. Komarov, I. S. Guseva, Author’s Certificate No. 148409 (1962).
- N. V. Komarov, I. S. Guseva, Author’s Certificate No. 164598 (1964).
- E. A. Gastilovich, D. N. Shigorin, N. V. Komarov, Optics and Spectroscopy, 16, No. 1, 46 (1964).