Abstract Generated abstract
The paper studies Cauchy type singular integrals on closed rectifiable Jordan curves with tangent at every point, deriving estimates for the modulus of continuity of the integral in terms of the modulus of the density and geometric conditions on the curve. It introduces classes of functions defined by weighted integrability of their moduli of continuity, gives criteria for equality or proper inclusion of such classes, and proves invariance and mapping results for the singular integral operator, including analogues for conjugate trigonometric functions and boundary values in \(L_p\). The results are extended to singular integrals depending on a parameter, yielding Hölder type estimates under power conditions on the curve and the density. As an application, Fredholm type solvability statements and an index formula are obtained for a class of singular integral equations by the Carleman, Vekua method.
Full Text
UDC 517.948.32
MATHEMATICS
A. A. BABAEV
SOME PROPERTIES OF A SINGULAR INTEGRAL WITH DISCONTINUOUS DENSITY AND ITS APPLICATIONS
(Presented by Academician I. N. Vekua on 26 X 1965)
1. Let \(\Gamma\) be a closed Jordan rectifiable curve, at each point of which a tangent exists, and let \(S(t_1,t_2)\) denote the smaller of the lengths of the arcs joining the points \(t_1,t_2 \in \Gamma\). Suppose that
\[ S(t_1,t_2)\leqslant \beta(|t_1-t_2|), \tag{1} \]
where \(\beta(\delta)\) is a continuous, increasing function on \((0,l_0]\) (\(l_0\) is the diameter of \(\Gamma\)); \(\lim_{\delta\to 0}\beta(\delta)=0\), and \(\beta(\delta)/\delta\) is almost decreasing. Let \(\alpha(\delta)\) be the inverse function of \(\beta(\delta)\); \(l\) the length of the curve \(\Gamma\). Denote by \(\Phi\) the class of functions \(\varphi(\delta)\), defined on \((0,l_0]\) and having the following properties: 1) \(\varphi(\delta)\) is continuous and monotonically increasing on \((0,l_0]\); 2) \(\varphi(\delta)\ne 0\) and \(\lim_{\delta\to 0}\varphi(\delta)=0\); 3) \(\varphi(\delta)/\delta\) is almost decreasing, i.e. \(\varphi(\delta_2)/\delta_2 \leqslant C_\varphi \varphi(\delta_1)/\delta_1\) for \(\delta_2>\delta_1\).
Introduce the modulus of continuity of a function \(f(t)\), defined on \(\Gamma\):
\[ \omega(f,\delta)=\sup_{|t_1-t_2|\leqslant \delta}|f(t_1)-f(t_2)|,\qquad 0<\delta\leqslant l_0. \]
Theorem 1. If \(\Gamma\) satisfies the conditions stated above and
\[ \omega(f,\delta)\leqslant C_f\varphi(\delta),\qquad \varphi(\delta)\in\Phi,\qquad \int_0^{l/2}\frac{\varphi(\alpha(s))}{\alpha(s)}\,ds<+\infty, \]
then
\[ \omega(g,\delta)\leqslant CC_f\left[ \int_0^{\beta(\delta)}\frac{\varphi(\alpha(s))}{\alpha(s)}\,ds + \delta\int_{\beta(\delta)}^{l/2}\frac{\varphi(\alpha(s))}{\alpha^2(s)}\,ds \right], \qquad 0<\delta\leqslant \widetilde l_0\leqslant l_0, \]
where
\[ g(t_0)=\frac{1}{\pi i}\int_\Gamma \frac{f(t)}{t-t_0}\,dt, \]
and the constant \(C\) depends only on the curve \(\Gamma\) and on the constant \(C_\varphi\) (\(\widetilde l_0\) depends only on \(\Gamma\)).
Remark. This theorem* was given in paper (1). Here it is included in order to note the dependence of \(C\) only on \(\Gamma\) and \(C_\varphi\), which will be used essentially in what follows.
With the aid of theorem (1) and the remark, one proves
Theorem 2. Let \(\Gamma\) be a closed Jordan rectifiable curve, having a tangent at every point and satisfying the condition
\[ S(t_1,t_2)\leqslant K|t_1-t_2|,\qquad K=\mathrm{const}. \tag{2} \]
Then, if
\[ \int_0^{l_0}\frac{\omega(f,\tau)}{\tau}\,d\tau<+\infty, \]
then for the function
\[ g(t_0)=\frac{1}{\pi i}\int_\Gamma \frac{f(t)}{t-t_0}\,dt \]
* In paper (1), in inequality (3), in the second integral, \(\alpha(s)\) was printed in the denominator; it should read \(\alpha^2(s)\).
there is the inequality
\[ \omega(g,\delta)\leq C\left[\int_0^\delta \frac{\omega(f,\tau)}{\tau}\,d\tau+ \delta\int_\delta^{l_0}\frac{\omega(f,\tau)}{\tau^2}\,d\tau\right], \qquad 0<\delta\leq l_0, \tag{3} \]
where \(C\) depends only on \(\Gamma\).
An inequality close to inequality (3), in the case of smooth curves, was first obtained by L. G. Magnaradze \((^2)\).
II. Denote by \(\Psi\) the class of positive, continuous functions \(\psi(\delta)\), defined on \((0,l_0]\) and having the properties: 1)
\[ \int_0^{l_0}\psi(u)\,du=+\infty; \]
2)
\[ \int_0^{l_0}u\psi(u)\,du<+\infty. \]
In this section it is assumed that \(\Gamma\) satisfies the conditions of theorem (2).
Let \(\psi(\delta)\in\Psi\). Denote by \(J_\psi\) the class of functions \(f(t)\), defined on \(\Gamma\), for which
\[ \int_0^{l_0}\omega(f,\tau)\psi(\tau)\,d\tau<+\infty. \]
The following theorem partially solves the question of the classification of \(J_\psi\).
Theorem 3. Let \(\psi_1(\delta),\psi_2(\delta)\in\Psi\). If
\[ 0<\underline{\lim}_{\delta\to0}\bigl(\psi_1(\delta)/\psi_2(\delta)\bigr) \leq \overline{\lim}_{\delta\to0}\bigl(\psi_1(\delta)/\psi_2(\delta)\bigr)<+\infty, \]
then \(J_{\psi_1}\) and \(J_{\psi_2}\) coincide, while if
\[ \lim_{\delta\to0}\bigl(\psi_1(\delta)/\psi_2(\delta)\bigr)=+\infty, \]
then \(J_{\psi_1}\) is a proper part of \(J_{\psi_2}\).
With the aid of theorems 2 and 3 one proves
Theorem 4. Let \(\psi(\delta)\in\Psi\) and
\[ \lim_{\delta\to0}\delta^2\psi(\delta)=0, \qquad \lim_{\delta\to0}\left(\delta\psi(\delta)\bigg/\int_\delta^{l_0}\psi(\tau)\,d\tau\right)=K \quad (0<K<1). \]
Then \(J_\psi\) is invariant with respect to the operator
\[ Af=\frac{1}{\pi i}\int_\Gamma \frac{f(t)}{t-t_0}\,dt. \]
It is not difficult to verify that the functions
\(\psi(\delta)=1/\delta^{1+\varepsilon}\),
\(\psi(\delta)=\ln|1/\delta|/\delta^{1+\varepsilon}\)
\((0<\varepsilon<1)\) satisfy the conditions of theorem 4, and the classes \(J_\psi\) generated by them, by virtue of theorem 3, are different for different \(\varepsilon\).
For the further arguments the following is useful
Lemma. Let \(\psi(\delta)\in\Psi\) and
\[ \lim_{\delta\to0}\delta^2\psi(\delta)=0, \qquad \lim_{\delta\to0}\left(\delta\psi(\delta)\bigg/\int_\delta^{l_0}\psi(\tau)\,d\tau\right)=0. \tag{4} \]
Then the function
\[ \frac{1}{\delta}\int_\delta^{l_0}\psi(\tau)\,d\tau=\psi_1(\delta)\in\Psi \]
also satisfies conditions (4).
With the aid of theorems 2 and 3 and the lemma one proves
Theorem 5. Let \(\psi(\delta)\in\Psi\) and satisfy conditions (4). Then the operator \(A\) maps \(J_{\psi_{i+1}}\) into \(J_{\psi_i}\), where
\[ \psi_{i+1}(\delta)=\frac{1}{\delta}\int_\delta^{l_0}\psi_i(\tau)\,d\tau \quad (i=0,1,2,\ldots),\qquad \psi_0(\delta)=\psi(\delta), \]
and \(J_{\psi_{i+1}}\) is a proper part of \(J_{\psi_i}\).
This result in the case \(\psi(\delta)=1/\delta\) was obtained by L. G. Magnaradze \((^2)\). Theorem 5 makes it possible to construct a sequence \(\{J_{\psi_i}\}\) different from the sequence \(\{J_i\}\) constructed by L. G. Magnaradze in the same paper.*
We note that, by virtue of Zygmund’s estimate \((^3)\), Theorems 4 and 5 are also valid for trigonometrically conjugate functions.
Remark. Let us point out that X. Sjoe-Mou \((^4)\) succeeded in proving analogues of the theorems of L. G. Magnaradze expressing the relation between the modulus of continuity of \(\varphi(t)\) in \(L_p\) \((p>1)\) and the modulus of continuity in \(L_p\) of the angular boundary values of the Cauchy-type integral
\[ F(z)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\Gamma}\frac{\varphi(t)}{t-z}\,dt \]
(\(\Gamma\) is a closed Jordan rectifiable curve satisfying condition (2)).
By virtue of the estimate, obtained in the same paper, expressing the relation between the modulus of continuity of \(\varphi(t)\) in \(L_p\) and the modulus of continuity in \(L_p\) of the angular boundary values \(F(z)\), Theorems 4 and 5 are valid in this case as well.
III. Consider the singular integral
\[ \Phi(t_0,\tau)=\int_{\Gamma}\frac{f(t,\tau)}{t-t_0}\,dt, \]
where \(t_0\in\Gamma,\ \tau\in D\) (\(D\) is some bounded set in the complex plane). Denote
\[ \omega_t(f,\delta)=\sup_{\tau}\ \sup_{|t_1-t_2|\le \delta}\left|f(t_1,\tau)-f(t_2,\tau)\right|, \]
\[ \omega_\tau(f,\delta)=\sup_t\ \sup_{|\tau_1-\tau_2|\le \delta}\left|f(t,\tau_1)-f(t,\tau_2)\right|. \]
With the aid of Theorem 1 one proves
Theorem 6. Let \(\Gamma\) be a closed Jordan rectifiable curve, having a tangent at every point and satisfying condition (1). If
\[ \omega_t(f,\delta)=O[\varphi(\delta)],\qquad \omega_\tau(f,\delta)=O[\widetilde{\varphi}(\delta)], \]
\[ \varphi(\delta)\in\Psi[\beta(\delta)]\cap\Psi_1[\beta(\delta)]^{**},\qquad \widetilde{\varphi}(\delta)\int_{\beta(\delta)}^{1/2}\frac{ds}{\alpha(s)} =O\left[\varphi(\delta)\frac{\beta(\delta)}{\delta}\right] \]
(\(\widetilde{\varphi}(\delta)\) is a positive function), then
\[ \omega_{t_0}(\Phi,\delta)=O\left[\varphi(\delta)\frac{\beta(\delta)}{\delta}\right],\qquad \omega_\tau(\Phi,\delta)=O\left[\varphi(\delta)\frac{\beta(\delta)}{\delta}\right]. \]
Let us note one important particular case of this theorem, which is a generalization of a theorem of N. I. Muskhelishvili \((^5)\) on a singular integral containing a parameter.
Theorem 7. Let \(\Gamma\) be a closed Jordan rectifiable curve, having a tangent at every point and
\[ S(t_1,t_2)\le \mathrm{const}\,|t_1-t_2|^\gamma \qquad (0<\gamma\le 1). \]
If
\[ \omega_t(f,\delta)=O[\delta^\alpha],\qquad \omega_\tau(f,\delta)=O[\delta^{\alpha_1}],\qquad 1-\gamma<\alpha<\alpha_1\le 1, \]
then
\[ \omega_{t_0}(\Phi,\delta)=O[\delta^{\alpha-(1-\gamma)}],\qquad \omega_\tau(\Phi,\delta)=O[\delta^{\alpha-(1-\gamma)}]. \]
IV. Denote \(\displaystyle \bigcup_{\alpha>\beta} H_\alpha\) by \(M_\beta\) \((0\le \beta<1)\), where \(H_\alpha\) is the class of functions,
* For example, it follows from Theorem 3 that, if \(\psi(\delta)=|\ln|\ln(1/\delta)||/\delta\), then for every \(i=1,2,\ldots\) the class \(J_{\psi_i}\) will be strictly contained between the classes \(J_{i+1}\) and \(J_i\) \((J_{i+1}\subset J_{\psi_i}\subset J_i)\).
** The definition of the classes \(\Psi[\beta(\delta)]\) and \(\Psi_1[\beta(\delta)]\) is given in \((^1)\).
satisfying on \(\Gamma\) the Hölder condition with exponent \(\alpha\). Consider the singular integral equation
\[ R\varphi=A(t_0)\varphi(t_0)+\frac{B(t_0)}{\pi i}\int_{\Gamma}\frac{\varphi(t)}{t-t_0}\,dt+\frac{1}{\pi i}\int_{\Gamma}N(t_0,t)\varphi(t)\,dt=f(t_0) \]
and its adjoint equation
\[ R'\psi=A(t_0)\psi(t_0)-\frac{1}{\pi i}\int_{\Gamma}\frac{B(t)\psi(t)}{t-t_0}\,dt+\frac{1}{\pi i}\int_{\Gamma}N(t,t_0)\psi(t)\,dt=g(t_0). \]
With the aid of Theorem 7 and the Carleman–Vekua method \({}^{(6)}\), the following is proved.
Theorem 8. Let \(\Gamma\) satisfy the conditions of Theorem 7, \(2/3<\gamma\leq 1\). If \(A^2(t_0)-B^2(t_0)\neq 0,\ t_0\in\Gamma,\ A(t_0), B(t_0)\in M_{3(1-\gamma)};\ N(t_0,t)\), in both arguments, uniformly respectively in \(t\) and \(t_0\), belongs to \(M_{2(1-\gamma)}\), then the following assertions are true:
-
The number of linearly independent solutions of the equations \(R\varphi=0\) and \(R'\psi=0\) in \(M_{1-\gamma}\) is finite.
-
For \(f(t_0)\in M_{2(1-\gamma)}\), in order for the equation \(R\varphi=f\) to be solvable in \(M_{1-\gamma}\), it is necessary and sufficient that
\[ \int_{\Gamma} f(t)\psi_k(t)\,dt=0\qquad (k=1,\ldots,m'), \]
where \(\psi_1(t),\ldots,\psi_{m'}(t)\) is a complete system of linearly independent solutions of the adjoint homogeneous equation \(R'\psi=0\) in \(M_{1-\gamma}\).
- If by \(m\) and \(m'\) we denote respectively the number of linearly independent solutions of \(R\varphi=0\) and \(R'\psi=0\) in \(M_{1-\gamma}\), then
\[ m-m'=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\left[\ln\frac{A-B}{A+B}\right]_{\Gamma}, \]
where \([\ ]_{\Gamma}\) denotes the increment of the expression in brackets when traversing \(\Gamma\) in the positive direction.
Azerbaijan State University
named after S. M. Kirov
Received
12 X 1965
REFERENCES
\({}^{1}\) A. A. Babaev, V. V. Salaev, DAN, 161, No. 2 (1965).
\({}^{2}\) L. G. Magnaradze, Communications of the Academy of Sciences of the Georgian SSR, 8, No. 8 (1947).
\({}^{3}\) N. K. Bari, S. B. Stechkin, Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obshch., 5 (1956).
\({}^{4}\) U. Soe-Mou, RZhMat, No. 10, 11508 (1960).
\({}^{5}\) I. N. Muskhelishvili, Singular Integral Equations, Moscow, 1962.
\({}^{6}\) I. N. Vekua, Trudy Tbilissk. Mat. Inst., 10 (1941).