Abstract Generated abstract
This note studies solvability of nonlinear operator equations of the form AF(x) = x in a real Hilbert space, relaxing earlier assumptions that the positive self-adjoint operator A be bounded. It establishes existence theorems for potential nonlinear operators under weak upper semicontinuity and coercivity-type conditions, as well as a uniqueness result for certain nonpotential operators satisfying local Lipschitz and monotonicity inequalities. The results are applied to nonlinear Hammerstein integral equations with possibly unbounded self-adjoint positive integral operators generated by Carleman-type kernels, yielding existence and uniqueness criteria in L2 and Lp settings under growth, continuity, and weak upper semicontinuity assumptions on the associated Nemytskii operators.
Full Text
UDC 517.947.35
I. M. LAVRENT'EV
ON THE SOLVABILITY OF NONLINEAR EQUATIONS
(Presented by Academician A. N. Kolmogorov on 21 X 1966)
1. In the present note we consider the question of the existence of a solution for the nonlinear equation
\[ AF(x)=x \tag{1} \]
in a real Hilbert space. Here \(A\) and \(F(x)\) are, respectively, linear and nonlinear operators acting in \(H\). Such equations were considered in the works \((^{3,6})\). It was assumed there that the operator \(A\) is self-adjoint and bounded, and that \(F(x)\) is a potential operator satisfying certain conditions.
Here we shall consider equation (1) under more general assumptions concerning the operator \(A\); namely, we shall not assume that the operator \(A\) is bounded. In Theorem 4 we shall also consider the case when the operator \(F(x)\) is not potential. The theorems established here for equation (1) will be applied to the study of nonlinear Hammerstein-type integral equations, and we shall establish new assumptions for them.
2. Theorem 1. Let \(A\) be a positive self-adjoint operator defined on a dense set in the Hilbert space \(H\), and let \(f(x)\) be a weakly differentiable and weakly upper semicontinuous functional satisfying the condition
\[ f(x)\leq a_1(x,x)^\theta+a_2(x,x)^\mu+a_3, \]
where \(a_1<0,\ a_2\geq 0,\ a_3\geq 0,\ 0\leq \mu<\theta<1\).
Then the equation \(AF(x)=x\), where \(F(x)=\operatorname{grad} f(x)\), has at least one solution.
Theorem 2. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:
\(1^\circ\). \(A\) is a positive self-adjoint operator defined on a dense set in the Hilbert space \(H\); \(F(x)\) is a potential operator acting in \(H\).
\(2^\circ\). For some fixed element \(x_0\in R(A^{1/2})\) the inequality
\[ (DF(x_0+\tau h,h),h)\leq \gamma(h)\|h\|,\qquad 0\leq \tau\leq 1, \]
holds, where \(\gamma(h)\leq 0,\ \lim_{\|h\|\to\infty}\gamma(h)=-\infty,\ DF(x,h)\) is the Gateaux differential of the operator \(F(x)\).
\(3^\circ\). The potential of the operator \(F(x)\) is weakly upper semicontinuous.
Then the operator equation \(AF(x)=x\) has at least one solution.
Remark 1. If, instead of condition \(3^\circ\) of the theorem, one requires that for all \(x,h\in H\) the inequality \((DF(x,h),h)\leq 0\) hold, with equality possible only for \(h=0\), then the equation \(AF(x)=x\) has a unique solution.
Theorem 3. Let \(A\) be a positive self-adjoint operator defined on a dense set in \(H\); let \(F(x)\) be a potential operator satisfying, for some fixed \(x_0\in R(A^{1/2})\), the inequality
\[ (F(x_0+h)-F(x_0),h)\leq \gamma(\|h\|)\|h\|, \]
where \(\gamma(t)\leq 0,\ \lim_{t\to\infty}\gamma(t)=-\infty\).
Then, if the potential of the operator \(F(x)\) is weakly upper semicontinuous, the equation \(AF(x)=x\) has at least one solution.
Remark 2. If, in the conditions of the theorem, one additionally requires that for any \(x,h\in H\) the inequality
\[
(F(x+h)-F(x),h)\leq 0
\]
hold, with equality only for \(h=0\), then the equation \(AF(x)=x\) has a unique solution.
Theorem 4. Let \(A\) be a positive self-adjoint operator, defined on a dense set in \(H\); let \(F(x)\) be a nonlinear operator satisfying the conditions:
\(1^\circ.\)
\[
\|F(x+h)-F(x)\|\leq N(r)\|h\|,\quad x,\ x+h\in D_r,
\]
where \(D_r\) is the ball of radius \(r\) with center at the point \(x=0\).
\(2^\circ.\)
\[
(F(x+h)-F(x),h)\leq m(r)\|h\|^2,\quad x,\ x+h\in D_r,
\]
where \(m(t)\leq 0\),
\[
\lim_{t\to\infty} t m(t)=-\infty .
\]
Then the operator equation \(AF(x)=x\) has a unique solution.
3. We shall apply the results presented here to establishing existence and uniqueness theorems for the solution of the nonlinear integral equation
\[
u(x)=\int_\Omega K(x,y)g(u(y),y)\,dy .
\tag{2}
\]
Here \(\Omega\) is a measurable set of finite or infinite measure in an \(m\)-dimensional Euclidean space.
Such propositions were considered in the works \((^4,^6,^7)\). It was assumed there that the integral operator generated by the kernel \(K(x,y)\) is self-adjoint and bounded.
However, when kernels of a more general type (Carleman kernels) are considered, this condition may fail. Recall that a Carleman kernel is a function \(K(x,y)\), measurable on the set \(\Omega\times\Omega\), such that almost everywhere in \(\Omega\times\Omega\)
\[
K(x,y)=K(y,x)
\]
and, for almost all \(x\in\Omega\),
\[
\int_\Omega |K(x,y)|^2\,dy<\infty .
\]
We shall consider equation (2), without assuming boundedness of the operator
\[
Au=\int_\Omega K(x,y)u(y)\,dy,
\]
generated by the kernel \(K(x,y)\).
In what follows we shall require that \(A\) be a self-adjoint, positive operator defined on a dense set in \(H\). Examples of kernels generating unbounded integral operators are given in \((^1)\).
Our basic assumption concerning the nonlinear part \(g(u,x)\) consists in requiring continuity of the Nemytskii operator \(hu=g(x,u(x))\) from \(L^p\) into \(L^q\) \((1/p+1/q=1)\).
A necessary and sufficient condition for continuity of \(hu\) was established in \((^2)\).
The following propositions hold:
\(1^\circ.\) Let \(p=2\), and let the functional
\[
f(u)=\int_\Omega G(u(x),x)\,dx
\]
be the potential of the operator \(hu\).
Suppose further that
\[
G(u,x)\leq a_1u^2+a_2(x)|u|^\alpha+a_3(x),
\]
where \(a_1<0,\ 0\leq a_2(x)\in L^{2/(2-\alpha)},\ 0<\alpha<2\) and \(0\leq a_3(x)\in L^1\).
Then, if \(f(u)\) is weakly upper semicontinuous, equation (2) has at least one solution belonging to \(L^2(\Omega)\).
\(2^\circ\). Let the function \(g(u,x)\) satisfy the following conditions:
1) \(g(u,x)\le a_1u+a_2(x)|u|^\alpha+a_3(x)\), \(u\ge 0\);
2) \(g(u,x)\ge b_1u+b_2(x)|u|^\alpha+b_3(x)\), \(u<0\);
here \(a_1<0,\ b_1<0;\ 0\le a_2(x)\in L^{2/(1-\alpha)};\ 0\ge b_2(x)\in L^{2/(1-\alpha)};\ 0<\alpha<1;\ 0\le a_3(x)\in L^2;\ 0\ge b_3(x)\in L^2\)*.
Then, if the potential of the operator \(hu\) is weakly upper semicontinuous, equation (2) has at least one solution belonging to \(L^2(\Omega)\).
The proof of these propositions is based on Theorem 1.
\(3^\circ\). Let \(H\) be the function \(g(u,x)\) such that for all \(u,\ v\in(-\infty,+\infty)\) and almost all \(x\in\Omega\)
\[
(g(u+v,x)-g(u,x))v\le av^2,
\]
where \(a<0\)**.
Then equation (2) has a unique solution in the space \(L^2(\Omega)\).
In the next proposition we shall assume that the measure of the set \(\Omega\) is infinite.
\(4^\circ\). Let \(A\) be a positive self-adjoint operator (bounded or unbounded) acting in the space \(L^2(\Omega)\). Suppose, moreover, that \(A\) is a bounded operator from \(L^p\) into \(L^q\)
\[
(1/p+1/q=1).
\]
Assume further that \(H\) is the function \(g(u,x)\) satisfying the following conditions:
1) \(g(u,x)\le a_2(x)|u|^\alpha+a_3(x)\), \(\quad u\ge 0\),
\[
g(u,x)\ge -a_2(x)|u|^\alpha-a_3(x),\quad u<0;
\]
here \(0\le a_2(x)\in L^{p/[(p-1)-\alpha]},\ 0<\alpha<1,\ 0\le a_3(x)\in L^q\).
2) The Nemytskii operator \(hu=g(u(x),x)\) is continuous from \(L^p\) into \(L^q\).
Then, if the functional \(f(u)\), which is the potential of the operator \(hu\), is weakly upper semicontinuous, the integral equation (2) has at least one solution belonging to the space \(L^p(\Omega)\).
Let us note that analogous propositions can also be established for systems of nonlinear integral equations of the form
\[
u_i(x)=\int_\Omega K_i(x,y)g_i(u_1(y),u_2(y),\ldots,u_n(y),y)\,dy,
\]
\(i=1,2,\ldots,n\). In this case we additionally assume the existence of a function \(G(u_1,u_2,\ldots,u_n,x)\) such that
\[
g_i(u_1,u_2,\ldots,u_n,x)=\frac{\partial}{\partial u_i}G(u_1,u_2,\ldots,u_n,x).
\]
The proof of these propositions is based on the method proposed by us in (7).
I express my gratitude to my scientific advisers V. V. Nemytskii and M. M. Vainberg for their advice and attention.
Moscow State University
named after M. V. Lomonosov
Received
1 IX 1966
REFERENCES
\(^{1}\) N. I. Akhiezer, UMN, 2, no. 5 (21), 93 (1947).
\(^{2}\) M. M. Vainberg, DAN, 92, no. 2, 213 (1953).
\(^{3}\) M. M. Vainberg, Variational methods for the study of nonlinear equations, 1956.
\(^{4}\) M. M. Vainberg, Uchen. zap. Mosk. obl. ped. inst., 77, no. 5, 131 (1959).
\(^{5}\) M. M. Vainberg, Sibirsk. matem. zhurn., 2, 2, 201 (1961).
\(^{6}\) M. Golomb, Math. Zs., 39, 45 (1934).
\(^{7}\) M. M. Lavrent’ev, DAN, 166, no. 2, 284 (1966).
\(^{8}\) Ya. L. Engel’son, Nauchn. dokl. vyssh. shkoly, no. 4, 75 (1958).
* The existence of such constants \(a_1,\ b_1,\ \alpha\) and functions \(a_i(x),\ b_i(x)\), \(i=1,2\), follows from the continuity condition for the Nemytskii operator.
** This condition, in particular, will be fulfilled if \(g(u,x)\) has a partial derivative with respect to \(u\), \(g'_u(u,x)\), which for almost all \(x\in\Omega\) satisfies the inequality \(g'_u(u,x)\le a\) \((a<0)\) and is bounded below.