Abstract Generated abstract
This paper studies plane self-similar nonisentropic flows of a polytropic gas with variable entropy, using a hodograph formulation in which density and entropy are treated as functions of the velocity components. It derives a closed system of partial differential equations for these functions and shows how the resulting representation determines the flow in self-similar coordinates. The analysis identifies a class of similarity solutions reducible to ordinary differential equations, including cases compatible with oblique shock discontinuities and channel flows with wall bends. It also obtains an approximate short-wave equation for the density in a narrow region behind a curvilinear shock wave, allowing variable entropy, and gives several particular solutions useful for applications.
Full Text
UDC 533.601.1
AERODYNAMICS
A. F. SIDOROV
ON SOME TWO-DIMENSIONAL SELF-SIMILAR FLOWS OF A POLYTROPIC GAS WITH VARIABLE ENTROPY
(Presented by Academician P. Ya. Kochina, May 7, 1966)
Let us consider plane nonisentropic flows of a polytropic gas with the equation of state \(p=a^2(s)\rho^\gamma\) (\(p\) is pressure, \(s\) is entropy, \(\rho\) is density, \(\gamma\) is the adiabatic exponent), depending on the self-similar variables \(\xi_i=x_i/t\) and determined by the system of equations:
\[ (l_1+b\rho_1+cs_1)\frac{\partial u_1}{\partial \xi_1} +l_2\frac{\partial u_1}{\partial \xi_2} +(b\rho_2+cs_2)\frac{\partial u_2}{\partial \xi_1}=0, \tag{1} \]
\[ (b\rho_1+cs_1)\frac{\partial u_1}{\partial \xi_2} +l_2\frac{\partial u_2}{\partial \xi_1} +(l_2+b\rho_2+cs_2)\frac{\partial u_2}{\partial \xi_2}=0, \]
\[ (l_1\rho_1+\rho)\frac{\partial u_1}{\partial \xi_1} +l_2\rho_1\frac{\partial u_1}{\partial \xi_2} +l_1\rho_2\frac{\partial u_2}{\partial \xi_1} +(l_2\rho_2+\rho)\frac{\partial u_2}{\partial \xi_2}=0; \tag{2} \]
\[ l_1s_1\frac{\partial u_1}{\partial \xi_2} +l_2s_1\frac{\partial u_1}{\partial \xi_2} +l_1s_2\frac{\partial u_2}{\partial \xi_1} +l_2s_2\frac{\partial u_2}{\partial \xi_2}=0; \]
here \(l_i=u_i-\xi_i,\ \rho_i=\partial \rho/\partial u_i,\ s_i=\partial s/\partial u_i\) \((i=1,2)\), \(u_i\) are the components of the velocity vector \(\mathbf u\), \(x_i\) are Cartesian coordinates, \(t\) is time,
\[ b=\gamma a^2(s)\rho^{\gamma-2},\qquad c=2a(s)a'(s)\rho^{\gamma-1}. \tag{4} \]
It is also assumed that \(u_1\) and \(u_2\) are functionally independent. Then equations (1) correspond to the equations of motion, (2) to the equation of continuity, and (3) to the adiabaticity condition.
Within the framework of this class of flows one can solve a number of important gas-dynamic problems; in particular, problems of the diffraction of plane shock waves by a convex corner and problems of the irregular reflection of plane shock waves from oblique walls. In the present note a closed system of equations is derived for the functions \(\rho(u_1,u_2)\), \(s(u_1,u_2)\) in the hodograph plane. These equations can be used to carry out various kinds of linearization and to construct approximate theories. A class of exact solutions is obtained in the presence of shock waves. The system of equations for \(\rho(u_1,u_2)\) and \(s(u_1,u_2)\) is also used to derive an approximate system of “short-wave” equations (see \((^1)\)), valid in a narrow zone behind a curvilinear shock wave, in which the gradients \(|\mathbf u|\) and \(p\) are large.
- The principal possibility of obtaining a system of equations for \(\rho\) and \(s\) in the hodograph plane is clear. Indeed, performing the hodograph transformation for the system of equations (1)—(3) and calculating the determinant of the matrix of the resulting system, homogeneous with respect to \(\partial \xi_i/\partial u_k\), we shall have a relation of the form \(F(\xi_1,\xi_2,u_1,u_2,\rho,s,\rho_i,s_i)=0\). Replacing one of the equations of the system (1)—(3) by this condition and finding from it the derivatives \(\partial \xi_1/\partial u_k\), we arrive at a system of 3 equations of the form
\[ a_{11}^{(j)}\frac{\partial \xi_2}{\partial u_1} +a_{(12)}^{(j)}\frac{\partial \xi_2}{\partial u_2} +a_{(13)}^{(j)}=0,\qquad j=1,2,3, \tag{1.1} \]
where \(a_{ik}^{(j)}\) are functions of \(\xi_2,u_1,u_2\) (the \(a_{ik}^{(j)}\) contain second derivatives of \(\rho\) and \(s\)).
Equating to zero the third-order determinant for (1.1), we find \(\xi_2\) as a function of \(u_1, u_2\), and, finally, substituting the derivatives \(d\xi_2/du_k\) from the relation obtained into any two equations of the system (1.1), we arrive at a system of 2 partial differential equations of third order for \(\rho\) and \(s\).
However, a direct implementation of this algorithm is quite difficult. The equations for \(\rho\) and \(s\) can be obtained only after establishing several auxiliary algebraic relations between the sought quantities, the principal one of which has the form
\[ l_2s_1-l_1s_2+b(s_1\rho_2-s_2\rho_1)=0. \tag{1.2} \]
Finally, the system of equations for \(\rho\) and \(s\) can be written in the form
\[ Q[\rho(1+R^2)-b(\rho_1-\rho_2R)^2](1-P_2)+ \]
\[ S[\rho(RP+T-(b\rho_2+cs_2)R)+P(b\rho_2+cs_2)(\rho_1-\rho_2R)]=0, \tag{1.3} \]
\[ Q[\rho(1+R^2)-b(\rho_1-\rho_2R^2)]P_1+S[\rho(P+(b\rho_1+cs_1)R)- \]
\[ -P(b\rho_1+cs_1)(\rho_1-\rho_2R))]=0, \]
where \(R=s_1/s_2,\ R_i=\partial R/\partial u_i,\ P_i=\partial P/\partial u_i,\ T_i=\partial T/\partial u_i,\ Q=R_1(b\rho_2+\)
\[ +cs_2)-R_2(b\rho_1+cs_1),\quad P=\frac{1}{Q}\bigl[(b\rho_1+cs_1)(R+T_2)+(b\rho_2+cs_2)(1- \]
\[ -T_1)\bigr],\quad T=b(\rho_2R-\rho_1),\quad S=RR_1+R_2+T_2R_1-T_1R_2. \]
The flow in the plane of the self-similar variables \(\xi_1,\xi_2\) is determined by the relations
\[ \xi_1=u_1-RP-T,\qquad \xi_2=u_2-P. \tag{1.4} \]
Any three-times continuously differentiable solution of the system (1.3) satisfying, in some domain, the conditions
\[ Q=0,\quad T\ne0,\quad (1-P_2)(1-R_1P-T_1)-P_1(R+R_2P+T_2)\ne0, \tag{1.5} \]
satisfies the system of equations (1)—(3) and, consequently, gives a solution of the equations of gas dynamics for the case under consideration; here \(u_1\) and \(u_2\), as functions of \(\xi_1,\xi_2\), are found from (1.4).
2. We shall seek particular solutions of the system (1.3) in the form
\[ \rho=u_1^\alpha u_2^\lambda f_\rho(u_1u_2^\chi),\qquad a^2(s)=u_1^\beta u_2^\mu f_s(u_1u_2^\chi). \tag{2.1} \]
An analysis of the dimensions of the terms in the system (1.3) shows that the system (1.3) has nontrivial solutions of the form (2.1) only under the conditions
\[ \lambda=\mu=0,\qquad \chi=-1,\qquad (\gamma-1)\alpha+\beta-2=0; \tag{2.2} \]
for \(f_\rho\) and \(f_s\) one obtains a system of two ordinary equations with independent variable \(u_1/u_2\), while the equations (1.4) will have the form \(\xi_i=u_iF_i(u_1/u_2)\), where \(F_1\) and \(F_2\) are expressed in terms of the functions \(f_\rho\) and \(f_s\). Thus, returning to the variables \(\xi_i\) and setting
\[ u_1=\xi_1f_1(\xi),\qquad u_2=\xi_1f_2(\xi),\qquad \rho=\xi_1^\alpha f_3(\xi), \]
\[ a^2(s)=\xi_1^\beta f_4(\xi),\qquad \xi=\xi_1/\xi_2, \tag{2.3} \]
for the functions \(f_1\) we shall have the system of ordinary equations
\[ \xi(f_1-f_2\xi)f_1' + \gamma\xi f_3^{\gamma-2}f_4f_3' + \xi f_3^{\gamma-1}f_4' - \]
\[ -f_1' + f_1^2 + (\gamma\alpha+\beta)f_3^{\gamma-1}f_4=0, \]
\[ \xi(f_1-f_2\xi)f_2' - \gamma\xi^2 f_3^{\gamma-2}f_4f_3' - \xi^2 f_3^{\gamma-1}f_4' - f_2 + f_1f_2=0, \tag{2.4} \]
\[ \xi f_3f_1' - \xi^2 f_3f_2' + \xi(f_1-f_2\xi)f_3' - \alpha f_3 + (\alpha+1)f_1f_3=0, \]
\[ \xi(f_1-f_2\xi)f_4' - \beta f_4+\beta f_1f_4=0. \]
Here the prime denotes differentiation with respect to \(\xi\).
The class of solutions (2.3) permits the construction of flows with discontinuities of the oblique-shock type, specified by the equation
\[ q_1\xi_1+q_2\xi_2+q_3=0,\qquad q_i=\text{const}, \tag{2.5} \]
when the flow in front of and behind the shock front belongs to the type under consideration. In this case all the Hugoniot conditions along (2.4) are satisfied when (2.2) is fulfilled exactly.
Flows of the form (2.3) have stationary streamlines, and therefore the solutions of system (2.4) can be used to construct flows in plane curvilinear channels of special form with a bend in the walls, when a shock wave appears at the bend.
In the case \(\alpha=-2,\ \beta=2\gamma\), the pressure \(p\) does not depend on time, and to a flow of the form (2.3) one may apply Smith’s theorem \(\left({}^{2}\right)\), by means of which one obtains a class of solutions with one arbitrary function of one argument of the form
\[ u_1=\frac{mx_1}{mt+h(m)}\,f_1\!\left(\frac{x_1}{x_2}\right),\qquad u_2=\frac{mx_1}{mt+h(m)}\,f_2\!\left(\frac{x_1}{x_2}\right), \]
\[ \rho=\frac{[mt+h(m)]^2}{m^2x_1^2}\, f_3\!\left(\frac{x_1}{x_2}\right),\qquad s=\frac{x_1^{2\gamma}}{m^2[mt+h(m)]^{2\gamma}}\, f_4\!\left(\frac{x_1}{x_2}\right), \tag{2.6} \]
\[ m=x_2\exp\!\left(\int \frac{d\xi}{\xi+\varphi(\xi)}\right),\qquad \varphi(\xi)=\frac{f_1(\xi)}{f_2(\xi)}, \]
where \(h(m)\) is an arbitrary function.
3. Let us consider a shock wave whose motion is determined by the equation \(\Phi(\xi_1,\xi_2)=0\), propagating through a stationary gas of constant density. Let the flow behind the wave depend on \(\xi_1,\xi_2\), and suppose that in the \(\xi_1,\xi_2\) plane, beyond the curve \(\Phi(\xi_1,\xi_2)=0\), there is a narrow region in which the gradients of the velocity modulus and pressure are large—the so-called region of “short” waves. For weak shock waves, under the assumption that the flow is isentropic, the equations of “short” waves were derived in \(\left({}^{1}\right)\). We shall assume that in the mentioned zone behind the shock wave the relations
\[ (\mathbf{u}\cdot\vec{\tau})=\varepsilon(\mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{n}), \tag{3.1} \]
\[ \partial|\mathbf{u}|/\partial\tau=\lambda\,\partial|\mathbf{u}|/\partial n, \tag{3.2} \]
are satisfied, where \(\mathbf{n}\) is the unit normal vector to the shock wave, \(\vec{\tau}\) is the unit tangent vector, and \(|\varepsilon|\ll 1,\ |\lambda|\ll 1\). Note that (3.2) entails the condition \(\partial p/\partial\tau=\mu\,\partial p/\partial n,\ |\mu|\ll 1\), and no assumptions are made concerning the relative entropy.
The conditions (3.1), (3.2), with the aid of (1.4), can be written in the form of relations connecting derivatives of \(\rho\) and \(s\) with respect to \(u_1,u_2\) up to and including the third order. Using the smallness of \(\varepsilon\) and \(\lambda\) and estimating the terms in system (1.3), we finally obtain from (1.3) the following second-order equation for the density \(\rho\):
\[ \gamma pp'(p'\rho-\gamma p\rho_r)(\rho\rho_{\varphi\varphi}-\rho_\varphi^2) +\gamma p\rho'\rho\rho_\varphi(\gamma p r\rho_{r\varphi} -p'\rho_\varphi-\gamma p\rho_\varphi/r) +r^2\rho^2(p'\rho-\gamma p\rho_r')=0. \tag{3.3} \]
Here \(u_1=r\cos\varphi,\ u_2=r\sin\varphi\), \(p(r)\) is an arbitrary function of \(r\), and a prime denotes differentiation with respect to \(r\). Both equations of system (1.3) lead to this equation if, for the pressure \(p\), the relation \(p_1u_2-p_2u_1=0\) \((p_i=\partial p/\partial u_i)\), obtained from a linear combination of the original equations, is satisfied. The flow in the \(\xi_1,\xi_2\) plane is determined by the relations
\[ \xi_1=u_1-\frac{\gamma pp'\rho_\varphi u_2}{\rho r^2(p'\rho-\gamma p\rho_r)},\qquad \xi_2=u_2+\frac{\gamma pp'\rho_\varphi u_1}{\rho r^2(p'\rho-\gamma p\rho_\varphi)}. \tag{3.4} \]
We indicate some particular solutions of (3.3) that may be used in solving concrete problems.
Putting \(p = A r^{k+2}\) and \(\rho = r^k \Phi(\varphi)\), for \(\Phi(\varphi)\) we obtain
\[ \varphi = \int \frac{d\Phi}{\left(\alpha \Phi^3 + B\Phi^{-2\beta}\right)^{1/2}} + C, \]
where \(\alpha = (k + 2 - \gamma k)/\gamma C(k+2)\), \(\beta = (2\gamma k - 2(k+2) - \gamma)/(k+2 - \gamma k)\); \(A, B, C, k\) are arbitrary constants.
Putting \(\rho = f(r)/\mu(\varphi+\varphi_0)^2\), \(\mu = \mathrm{const}\), \(\varphi_0 = \mathrm{const}\), for \(f(r)\) we obtain the ordinary equation
\[ 2\gamma p' \left(p'f - \gamma p f'\right) - 4\gamma p p' \left(p'f + \frac{\gamma p f}{r} - \gamma p f'\right) + \frac{r^2}{\mu}\left(p'f - \gamma p f'\right)^2 = 0, \]
the function \(p(r)\) here remains arbitrary.
Sverdlovsk Branchof the V. A. Steklov Mathematical Institute
Academy of Sciences of the USSR Received
15 IV 1966
REFERENCES
\(^{1}\) O. S. Ryzhov, S. A. Khristianovich, PMM, 12, no. 5 (1958).
\(^{2}\) P. Smith, Arch. Ration. Mech. and Analysis, 15, No. 2 (1964).