Uniqueness of the Region of Optimal Parameters of Ferroresonant Voltage Stabilizers

E. S. GITMAN, S. A. GORBATKOV, A. A. LEDIN, S. P. RYABOV
Submitted 1968 | SovietRxiv: ru-196801.10664 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

This paper examines whether ferroresonant voltage stabilizers have a unique region of optimal parameters under different stabilization requirements, input voltage deviations, and load types. Using methods from the mathematical theory of experiment, including factorial planning and steepest ascent, the authors optimize capacitance and saturated choke reactance with maximum output power as the criterion. For active loads, the optimal parameters obtained under altered voltage tolerance requirements remain close to earlier values, supporting the uniqueness of the optimal region and indicating an approximate relation between reactance and capacitive reactance. The study further shows that delivered power depends mainly on the permitted input voltage variation, and extends the results to active inductive loads by giving scaling relations for optimal parameters as functions of the load power factor.

Full Text

UNIQUENESS OF THE REGION OF OPTIMAL PARAMETERS OF FERRORESONANT VOLTAGE STABILIZERS

E. S. GITMAN, S. A. GORBATKOV, A. A. LEDIN, S. P. RYABOV

(Presented by the scientific-technical seminar of the Department of Electrical Equipment)

For the calculation of ferroresonant voltage stabilizers, it is important to establish the uniqueness of the region of optimal parameters under various requirements for the stabilization level and for deviations of the input voltage from the nominal value, with various kinds of loads.

In the present work, methods of the mathematical theory of experiment [1] are used, as set forth in application to the choice of optimal parameters of a ferroresonant stabilizer in [2], where the circuit of Fig. 1 was considered. The maximum output power was adopted as the optimality criterion. Under the requirements

Fig. 1. Circuit diagram of the ferroresonant voltage stabilizer.

Fig. 1

\[ \left. \begin{aligned} u_1 &= 220^{+20}_{-80}\ \text{V};\\ u_2 &= 220^{+12}_{-12}\ \text{V};\\ f &= 50\ \text{Hz};\\ \text{saturated core} &\text{— OL-128/80. 40, steel E 340;}\\ \text{load} &\text{ active} \end{aligned} \right\} \tag{1} \]

the following values of the optimal parameters were obtained:

\[ c = 70\ \mu\text{F}; \qquad x_s = 52.6\ \Omega . \]

Let us consider the operating modes of ferroresonant voltage stabilizers most frequently encountered in practice.

Active load

We solve the stated problem of determining the uniqueness of the region of optimal parameters as follows: under conditions (1), we impose new requirements

\[ \begin{aligned} u_1 &= 220 \pm 20\% \ \mathrm{V};\\ u_2 &= 220 \pm 2\% \ \mathrm{V} \end{aligned} \tag{2} \]

and compare the optimal parameters for both cases.

The planning matrix and the results of steepest ascent are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Table 1

Experiment number \(c\), µF \(x_s\), ohm \(P\), W
1 32 112 300
2 36 112 317
3 32 118 288
4 36 118 298

Table 2

\(c\), µF \(x_s\), ohm \(P\), W
Basic level 34 115
Variation interval 2 3
Upper level 36 118
Lower level 32 112
Regression coefficient 6,75 — 7,75
Step 13,5 —23,2
Rounded step 13 —22,3
Implemented experiment 47 92,7 394
» 60 70,4 505
» 73 48,1 715
» 86 25,8 632

The optimal parameters are: \(c = 73\) µF; \(x_s = 48{,}1\) ohm—and are close to the optimal parameters for conditions (1). The results obtained make it possible to conclude that the optimal parameters of ferroresonant voltage stabilizers for an active load are unique. In this case

\[ x_s/\omega c \simeq 1, \tag{3} \]

where \(\omega\) is the angular frequency.

Let us note that the power delivered by the stabilizer to the load depends mainly on the specified limits of variation of the input voltage and, within known limits, depends little on the level of stabilization of the output voltage. We shall show this by means of a two-factor experiment, in which the independent variables are taken to be: \(\pm \Delta u_1\)—the range of variation of the input voltage; \(\pm \Delta u_2\)—the range of variation of the output voltage. The independent variables are varied over wide limits (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3

$\pm \Delta u_1,\ \%$ $\pm \Delta u_1,\ \%$
Basic level 20 4
Variation interval 10 1
Upper level 30 5
Lower level 10 3

Table 4

Experiment number $\pm \Delta u_2,\ \%$ $\pm \Delta u_2,\ \%$ $P,\ \mathrm{W}$
1 10 3 820
2 30 3 585
3 10 5 835
4 30 5 615

The regression coefficients are: $b_0=713.75$; $b_1=-164$; $b_2=8.75$; $b_{12}=3.75$.

Since $b_2$ and $b_{12}$ are statistically insignificant in comparison with $b_0$ and $b_1$, one may write:

\[ P=P_0+\alpha\left(|\Delta u_{10}|-|\Delta u_1|\right), \tag{4} \]

where $P$ is the delivered power for the specified limits of variation of the input voltage $\pm \Delta u_1$; $P_0$ and $\Delta u_{10}$ are the delivered power and the limits of variation of the input voltage at the center of the experiment; $\alpha$ is a constant coefficient.

Active-inductive load

Let us consider the case of an active-inductive load with $\cos\varphi=0.8$. The results obtained below are also valid for other load values; in particular, a load with $\cos\varphi=0.6$ was checked experimentally.

The results of setting up the factorial experiment and the steepest ascent for conditions (2) are given in Tables 5 and 6.

The optimal parameters of the stabilizer are given in the next-to-last row of Table 6.

Table 5

Experiment number $c,\ \mu\mathrm{F}$ $x_s,\ \Omega$ $P,\ \mathrm{W}$ $P/\cos\varphi,\ \mathrm{VA}$
1 34 112 242 302.5
2 36 112 252 315
3 34 118 238 298.5
4 36 118 248 310

From a comparison of the obtained results with the optimal parameters from Table 2, the following conclusions follow:

  1. The optimal value of the active component of the load does not depend on $\cos\varphi$.

  2. The optimal values of $x_s$ and $c$ for an inductive load can be obtained from the relations for an active load

\[ x_{su}=x_{sa}\cos\varphi;\qquad c_u=c_a/\cos\varphi, \tag{5}, (6) \]

where the subscript “и” refers to the case of an inductive load, and the subscript “а” to the case of an active load.

Table 6

$c$, μF $x_s$, Ω $P$, W $P/\cos\varphi$, VA
Basic level 35 115 — —
Variation interval 1 3 — —
Upper level 36 118 — —
Lower level 34 112 — —
Regression coefficient 5 −2 — —
Step 5 −6 — —
Implemented experiment 40 109 280 350
» 45 103 302 377.5
» 50 97 328 401
» 55 91 356 445
» 60 85 388 485
» 65 79 420 525
» 70 73 452 565
» 75 67 472 590
» 80 61 526 657.5
» 85 55 576 720
» 90 49 634 792
» 95 43 716 882.5
» 100 37 680 850

REFERENCES

  1. V. V. Nalimov, N. A. Chernova. Statistical Methods of Experiment Planning. Moscow, “Nauka,” 1965.

  2. A. S. Gitman, E. S. Gitman. Selection of the optimal parameters of a ferroresonant stabilizer by the method of steepest ascent. Proceedings of the Tomsk Polytechnic Institute, vol. 172, 1967.

Submission history

Uniqueness of the Region of Optimal Parameters of Ferroresonant Voltage Stabilizers