DAMPING OF THE EARTH’S SPHEROIDAL OSCILLATIONS AT SMALL $n$
GEOPHYSICS
Submitted 1970-01-01 | SovietRxiv: ru-197001.05648 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

This paper estimates the damping of the Earth’s low-degree spheroidal free oscillations using a perturbation theory previously developed for spheroidal modes and a Gutenberg-Bullen A Earth model. Assuming dissipation occurs only through shear processes in the mantle and neglecting core dissipation, the authors group the crust and mantle into four zones and compute the sensitivity of modal frequencies to shear modulus for the fundamental tone up to n = 27 and the first four overtones for n = 1 to 7. Calculations for several trial mantle Q distributions, with variant 6 treated as most consistent with available evidence, yield relatively large Q values for small n spheroidal oscillations, for example about 1100 to 700 for the fundamental modes n = 1 to 7. The results suggest that some earlier observational estimates near 300 to 400 may be underestimated, possibly because of nonstationary background noise.

Full Text

UDC 550.311

GEOPHYSICS

V. N. ZHARKOV, V. M. LYUBIMOV

DAMPING OF THE EARTH’S SPHEROIDAL OSCILLATIONS AT SMALL $n$

(Presented by Academician M. A. Sadovskii on 28 VII 1969)

In previous papers ($^{1,2}$) we considered the damping of torsional and radial oscillations of the Earth. In the case of torsional oscillations, comparison of experimental data with theory made it possible, in broad outline, to determine the distribution of the dissipative function $Q$ in the Earth’s mantle. Using the distribution of $Q$ thus obtained and constructing a perturbation theory for the Earth’s radial oscillations, it proved possible to give an explanation of the anomalously large values of $Q$ observed after the Chilean earthquakes for radial oscillations ($^{2}$). This gives grounds for thinking that the distribution of $Q$ obtained in ($^{1}$) for the Earth’s mantle is close to the real sought distribution of the dissipative function. As all data indicate, $Q$ in the Earth’s liquid core is at least an order of magnitude greater than $Q$ for the mantle. Therefore at the present time, because of the insufficiency of experimental data, dissipation in the core has to be neglected.

In paper ($^{3}$) a perturbation theory was constructed for spheroidal oscillations of the Earth. This made it possible to continue the investigation begun in ($^{1,2}$) and to consider the damping of spheroidal oscillations of the Earth. Below we give the results of calculations for the fundamental tone up to $n = 27$ and the first 4 overtones for $n = 1$–7. These oscillations are of interest because they depend substantially on the properties of the Earth’s core, whereas oscillations with large $n$ are already noticeably displaced from the core into the Earth’s mantle.

As the computational model of the Earth, the Gutenberg–Bullen A (GBA) model was chosen. This model is described in detail in our preceding papers. It was also used in the works of Pekeris et al. (($^{4}$), pp. 230–232). In the model the crust and mantle are divided into 34 layers with piecewise-constant parameters. The Earth’s core is liquid and is divided into 7 layers: the inner core, a transitional layer, and the outer core, consisting of 5 layers. In principle the number of layers could be increased, but for our purposes this is unimportant. The integration of the differential equations was carried out from the center of the Earth. In the first region—the inner core—exact solutions are known, which are expressed in terms of Bessel functions ($^{5}$). Then the solution was continued by the Runge–Kutta method to the boundary of the core with the mantle and through the Earth’s mantle and crust to the surface, after which, by the formulas of the perturbation theory ($^{2}$), derivatives of the frequency with respect to the parameters of the problem—the density, the compressional modulus, and the shear modulus in each layer (respectively $\chi_{\rho i}$, $\chi_{k i}$, $\chi_{\mu i}$, $i$ being the layer number)—were calculated. As usual, it was assumed that dissipation occurs only in shear processes and thus is determined only by the derivative $\chi_{\mu}$.

In the concrete calculations the GBA model is “coarsened.” As stated above, it is assumed that dissipation in the core can be neglected, and the 34 layers of the crust and mantle are combined into four enlarged layers ($j = 1, 2, 3, 4$):

  1. Zone $A$ — crust ($0 \leq l \leq 38$ km).
  2. Zone $B$ — subcrustal zone ($38 \leq l \leq 300$ km).

Table 1

Variant $Q_1$ $Q_2$ $Q_3$ $Q_4$ Variant $Q_1$ $Q_2$ $Q_3$ $Q_4$
41 450 50 500 1000 5 450 100 500 1500
42 450 100 500 1000 6 450 100 500 1000
44 450 200 500 1000

Table 2

$n$ Variant 41 Variant 42 Variant 44 Variant 5 Variant 6
\multicolumn{5}{c}{$l = 0$}
1 820 1000 1100 1200 870
2 1000 1300 1400 1600 1100
3 740 970 1200 1200 870
4 640 860 1000 1000 780
5 610 820 980 980 750
6 580 790 960 950 730
7 550 760 930 900 700
8 510 720 900 850 660
9 470 670 855 775 610
10 450 645 820 735 570
11 430 610 775 685 525
12 420 595 750 655 500
13 410 575 725 625 470
14 400 560 695 600 450
15 390 540 670 575 425
16 380 525 650 550 405
17 365 510 630 530 390
18 355 495 610 510 370
19 340 475 590 490 355
20 330 460 575 470 345
21 315 445 560 460 330
22 300 430 545 435 320
23 285 415 535 420 310
24 270 400 525 400 300
25 260 385 510 390 295
26 245 370 495 370 285
27 235 355 490 360 275
$n$ Variant 41 Variant 42 Variant 44 Variant 5 Variant 6
\multicolumn{5}{c}{$l = 1$}
1 1700 2100 2500 2500 1800
2 510 690 820 770 570
3 440 590 730 660 480
4 420 570 690 630 460
5 540 670 760 770 540
6 890 940 960 1100 780
7 930 940 950 1200 900
$n$ Variant 41 Variant 42 Variant 44 Variant 5 Variant 6
\multicolumn{5}{c}{$l = 2$}
1 760 890 970 1000 680
2 1100 1300 1500 1630 1100
3 760 1000 1300 1200 920
4 550 800 1100 910 720
5 350 550 780 580 480
6 240 390 580 400 330
7 210 350 510 350 290
$n$ Variant 41 Variant 42 Variant 44 Variant 5 Variant 6
\multicolumn{5}{c}{$l = 3$}
1 1500 1900 2100 2200 1500
2 680 1100 1200 1200 830
3 980 1200 1300 1400 930
4 510 690 840 780 570
5 460 640 790 710 530
6 430 600 740 660 500
7 310 480 670 520 420
$n$ Variant 41 Variant 42 Variant 44 Variant 5 Variant 6
\multicolumn{5}{c}{$l = 4$}
1 430 570 700 600 470
2 590 780 940 870 630
3 650 960 1300 1000 800
4 450 700 960 740 630
5 340 530 730 570 460
6 320 490 680 530 430
7 310 480 670 340 420
  1. Zone $C$—transition layer $(300 \leq l \leq 1000\ \mathrm{km})$.

  2. Zone $D$—lower mantle $(1000 \leq l \leq 2900\ \mathrm{km})$.

Let $\mu_{0i}$ denote the dimensionless shear modulus in the $i$-th layer and let $R_i = \chi_{\mu i}\mu_{0i}$, where the layers are counted from the center of the Earth. Then the quantities sought, calculated by us, are equal to

\[ q^1 = \frac{2}{\chi_0}\sum_{i=40}^{41} R_i,\qquad q^2 = \frac{2}{\chi_0}\sum_{i=27}^{39} R_i,\qquad q^3 = \frac{2}{\chi_0}\sum_{i=18}^{26} R_i,\qquad q^4 = \frac{2}{\chi_0}\sum_{i=8}^{17} R_i, \tag{1} \]

where $\chi_0$ is the dimensionless natural frequency.

The formula by which the damping $Q$ was determined has the form

\[ Q^{-1} = \sum_{j=1}^{4} q^j Q_j^{-1}, \]

where \(Q_j\) \((j=1,2,3,4)\) is the distribution of the dissipative function in the Earth’s mantle \((^1)\). In \((^1)\) we considered the trial distributions \(Q_j\) given in Table 1.

On the basis of the experimental data presently available, the best distribution \(Q_j\) in the mantle is given by variant 6. The results of calculations for spheroidal oscillations \({}_l Q_{sn}\) \((n=1—7,\ l=0,1,2,3,4)\) are presented in Table 2.

The most substantial result of the present calculations should be considered the large values of \(Q\) obtained for spheroidal oscillations with small \(n\). The existing uncertainties are unlikely to change the quoted results for \(Q\) by more than \(100 \div 200\). Thus, we have
\({}_0 Q_{sn}\) \((n=1—7) \sim 1100—700\), variant 6.

If we turn to the experimental data \((^4,\ \text{pp. }33—59;\ 106—114)\), it turns out that \(Q_{sn}\) \((n=2—7) \sim 400 \div 300\). These experimental values of \({}_0 Q_{sn}\) are determined with insufficient confidence. It seems to us that they are simply erroneous. This is also indicated, in particular, by Smith \((^6)\) in his report prepared for the XIV General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics. Smith points out that a careful review of the old data showed that nonstationary noises (background) could have substantially affected the measured values of \(Q\) for the lower tones of spheroidal and torsional oscillations, and that the previously published values of \(Q\) were substantially underestimated in comparison with the real quantities. The results given in Table 1 are precisely what orient experimenters toward the real values of \({}_l Q_{sn}\) that should be expected from observations.

Institute of Physics of the Earth named after O. Yu. Schmidt Academy of Sciences of the USSR Moscow Received 14 VII 1969

REFERENCES

\(^1\) V. N. Zharkov, V. M. Lyubimov, A. A. Movchan, A. I. Movchan, Physics of the Earth, No. 2 (1967).
\(^2\) V. N. Zharkov, V. M. Lyubimov, DAN, 177, No. 2 (1967).
\(^3\) V. N. Zharkov, V. M. Lyubimov, DAN, 180, No. 2 (1968).
\(^4\) Free Oscillations of the Earth, Moscow, 1964.
\(^5\) V. N. Zharkov, Physics of the Earth, No. 8 (1967).
\(^6\) S. W. Smith, Trans. Am. Geophys. Un., 48, No. 2, 409 (1967).

Submission history

DAMPING OF THE EARTH’S SPHEROIDAL OSCILLATIONS AT SMALL $n$