Classification of Gold-Bearing Ore-Magmatic Systems of the Granitoid Series
Abstract Generated abstract
This paper proposes a classification of gold-bearing ore-magmatic systems associated with granitoid magmatism, based on generalized observations from deeply exposed ore fields in Western Siberia, Kazakhstan, and the Urals. The authors argue that gold-ore fields should be treated as localized petrological systems within larger magmatic complexes, identifiable through phase-facies analysis and volumetric mapping from surface exposures to explored depths. Six principal types are distinguished, including quartz-vein aureoles, skarn and hornfels aureoles, vein bundles rooted in batholith contacts or diorite stocks, and systems with deeper roots in exposed or concealed batholiths. The classification links ore localization to hybrid magma composition, differentiation, upward displacement, carbonate assimilation, and tectonic interaction, and is presented as a basis for improving prospecting and depth evaluation of gold deposits.
Full Text
CLASSIFICATION OF GOLD-BEARING ORE-MAGMATIC SYSTEMS OF THE GRANITOID SERIES
P. F. Ivankin, K. R. Rabinovich (SNIIGGiMS)
The present level of our knowledge about the forms of association between gold mineralization and magmatism has been attained thanks to the widely known works of W. Emmons, V. Lindgren, V. A. Obruchev, Yu. A. Bilibin, F. N. Shakhov, T. M. Dembo, A. Ya. Bulynnikov, P. N. Kropotkin, M. B. and N. I. Borodaevsky, and many others, in which the great diversity of geological settings for the formation of magmatogenic gold-ore deposits and the diversity of the very links between gold mineralization and magmas have been revealed. Analyzing the data of these studies and new materials, the authors have concluded that it is necessary to distinguish three series of gold-ore formations, associated respectively with derivative hyperbasitic, basaltoid, and granitoid magmas [1]. In each series, the observed spatial-structural and genetic relationships between magmatic rocks and ores are diverse; therefore, in metallogenic investigations and prospecting-exploration work it is necessary to distinguish types of these relationships. In the present communication an attempt is made to classify the various typical cases of the association of gold mineralization with magmatic rocks for the granitoid series of gold-ore formations. For this purpose the authors have generalized data on several deeply exposed gold-ore fields of Western Siberia, Kazakhstan, and the Urals, and have traced the relationships of ore and magmatic bodies in space from the present-day surface down to the maximum explored depths.
It is well known from practice that any potentially gold-bearing magmatic complex, or an isolated large pluton, is accompanied by commercial gold mineralization only in certain of its parts or nodes, and such parts are extremely small in comparison with the dimensions of the complex or pluton. This leads to the need to regard gold-ore fields as parts of a magmatic complex or of an individual pluton. At the same time, it is noteworthy that these parts of a potentially ore-bearing complex are always specific in composition, phase-facies features, relationship to the enclosing rocks of the framework, and other properties; this provides grounds for considering them as a certain, to some extent isolated system, and for finding the causes of the local separation of gold-bearing solutions in the distinctive development of this system, this specific segment.
of the magmatic complex. Such, in the final analysis, a petrological approach to the ore field makes it possible to make more concrete our ideas about the causes, time, and place of the generation of gold-bearing solutions, about the character of their separation from granitoid plutons and the paths of their migration, than do the usual research methods, which take into account the spatial-structural relations of mineralization to the magmatic body, the phases and stages of ore formation, and the time of mineralization relative to thermal metamorphism and the appearance of vein intrusions, establishing only the general connection between mineralization and magmatism. In this respect, the morphogenesis of the gold-ore field becomes the necessary link in research that ensures a solution to the problem of the space of the ore-magmatic process, proceeding under conditions of changing temperatures and pressures. Volumetric mapping of ore districts, in particular, makes it possible to identify the root parts of ore fields, the specific features of the phase-facies structure of the gold-bearing pluton in these parts of the granitoid complex, and to find the distinctive geological-petrological features of a given gold-bearing ore-magmatic system as compared with other non-ore-bearing parts of the same complex. Thus, we arrive at the concept of an ore-magmatic system and at the distinction of types of such systems by studying the phase-facies structure of ore-bearing plutons and by volumetric mapping of gold-ore fields associated with these plutons.
In the regions mentioned, the following types of gold-bearing ore-magmatic systems may be distinguished for granitoid batholiths of certain formations:
- Aureoles of quartz veins of granitoid acmoliths (rootless).
- Aureoles (and stockworks) of quartz veins with roots within diorite sill-laccoliths, formed in the do-batholithic stage.
- Aureoles of mineralized skarns and hornfelses around diorite satellites (stocks and protrusions of batholiths).
- Bundles of quartz veins and vein intrusions with roots in the endocontacts of “variegated” batholiths.
- Bundles of quartz veins with roots within diorite stocks (diapir plutons).
- Bundles of quartz veins and fully differentiated dikes with deep roots:
a) situated in the deep parts of exposed batholiths, both “variegated” and homogeneous granodioritic;
b) situated in the apical (?) parts of concealed batholiths.
The accompanying Table 1 summarizes the principal features of these systems and gives examples that have been studied. In the authors’ opinion, the six types of ore-magmatic systems distinguished do not exhaust the entire diversity of relations between gold mineralization and granitoid magmatism, but they characterize the principal forms of these relations. Analyzing the various features of the systems considered, one may make several general observations on the genesis of gold-ore deposits of the plutonic cycle. The separation of solutions from granitoid magmas and the formation of gold-bearing mineral masses take place during the stage of early magmatism and progressive metamorphism of rocks, during the period of formation of the batholithic bodies proper, and in the post-batholithic stage of the development of formations of “variegated” batholiths and granodiorites [2]. The most important features and conditions of granitoid magmatism that promote the accumulation of large quantities of gold in certain parts of the magmatic complex and its subsequent deposition in favorable structures are the following:
1) the hybrid character of palingenic magma, corresponding in composition to diorite or gabbro-diorite, during the magmatic replacement of various iron–magnesian sedimentary-volcanogenic and intrusive rocks—products of basaltic magmas of preceding cycles;
2) the completeness of differentiation of hybrid magmas, with the appearance of polar petrographic rock types (for example, gabbro and plagiogranite, diorite-porphyrite and syenite-porphyry, etc.);
3) significant upward displacement of hybrid magmas in the meso- and hypabyssal zones of the Earth’s crust, facilitating magma differentiation, the accumulation of mineralizers in the frontal parts of magmatic columns, separation at different levels, and concentrated movement of solutions; magmas that have not been displaced, even with high primary gold content, apparently do not create ore-magmatic systems;
4) assimilation of carbonate rocks by magmas, which is one of the causes of their differentiation;
5) interaction of mobile structural-tectonic elements with magmas during the period of their origin, displacement, and differentiation, which largely determines the development of the ore-magmatic system.
Various combinations of these factors, manifested under specific favorable geological-structural conditions, lead to the emergence of the distinguished gold-bearing ore-magmatic systems.
Further work on the typification and classification of gold-bearing systems, the deepening of our knowledge of the relationships between ores and magmas in typical systems, and the development of questions concerning their petrogeochemical vertical zonality, the regularities of formation, and the structural control of mineralization appear to be urgent above all for improving methods of prospecting and evaluation at depth of gold-ore deposits.
REFERENCES
-
Ivankin P. F., Rabinovich K. R. On two series of gold-ore formations and certain features of the relationship of gold mineralization to magmatism. Izv. Tomsk Polytechnic Institute, vol. 134, 1968.
-
Kuznetsov Yu. A. Main Types of Magmatic Formations. Moscow, Nedra Publishing House, 1964.
Types of Gold-Ore–Magmatic Systems of the Granitoid Series
Table 1
| Stage of formation of the granitoid complex | General features of the constituent complexes | Features of ore-bearing parts of the complexes: structural–morphological | Features of ore-bearing parts of the complexes: composition and character of phase relationships | Features of ore–magmatic systems: vertical extent; zoning of mineralization | Features of ore–magmatic systems: mineralization | Type name | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early stage of emplacement of the complex; appearance of magmatism | Granitoid–alkaline complexes: composite plutons, intergrowths and dikes, contacts cutting one another. Leucocratic monzodiorites, syenodiorites, granites, granophyres. | Frontal parts of plutons; small stock-like bodies, apophyses. Endocontacts of alkaline syenites and granites. | Granitoid composition and character of phase relationships: gabbro, diorites, granodiorites, granites; aplite and pegmatite dikes; at times nepheline syenites, granite porphyries, granophyres. | Short: stock-like bodies with apophyses; lenticular and veinlike ore bodies. | Quartz–sulfide veins. Metasomatites: pyritized, albitized, beresitized, kaolinized, chloritized rocks; acidic feldspar metasomatites. | Ores of acidic, subalkaline, and alkaline rocks | Aurosenskoe; Predgornoe in the Zaysan region; deposits of eastern Turkey; Klyuchinskii district of South Africa. |
| Early stage of emplacement of the complex | Early phases of large, multiphase complexes: melanocratic gabbroids, diorites, granodiorites; marginal facies of these rocks; also outlying, petrochemically differentiated subvolcanic differentiates. | Regional or local contact zones of stocks, dikes of alkaline gabbroids, monzonites, diorites, granodiorites, granites. | Gabbroids, gabbro-diorites, quartz diorites, diorites, granitoids; pegmatitic, aplite dikes; dikes of lamprophyres, spessartites, granophyres. | Short. Quartz veins, segregations and apophyses of pegmatites and aplites. | Quartz and carbonate veins with pyrite and galena; metasomatites: calcitization, chloritization. | 1. Ores of quartz veins of granitoids and alkaline rocks. | Aurosenskoe; Predgornoe in the Zaysan region; deposits of eastern Turkey; Klyuchinskii district of South Africa. |
| Early stage of emplacement of the complex | Early phases of silicic, subalkaline complexes: gabbroids, laccoliths, stocks, apophyses, dikes. | Rostroliths, gabbrodiorites, quartz diorites, diorites; commonly porphyritic varieties; dikes and dike swarms of basic and acidic compositions; veinlike and stocklike apophyses of quartz diorites, aplites, granites, syenites. | Diorites, quartz diorites, granodiorites, and granites; aplite and pegmatite dikes; dikes of lamprophyres, spessartites, granite porphyries, granophyres. | Up to 0.5 km, in the upper endocontact of the intrusive mass, in ore fields within ore zones; in places confined to stockworks in contact limestones, diorites, syenites, and migmatites, with decreasing depth. | Simple gold–quartz veins in ores, disseminations, lenses; stockworks and lenticular bodies in limestones, diorites, syenites, and granites. | 2. Ores of stockworks and stocklike quartz bodies and of dissemination within granitoid stocks and laccoliths. | Komaurar (Kuznetsk Alatau); deposits of northern California. |
| Any stage of emplacement of the complex | Cores of batholiths of relatively isometric, subisometric composition, having internal contacts between complexes. | — | — | — | — | BARREN | — |
| Any stage of emplacement of the complex | Peripheral zones of large batholiths. Satellite character. | — | — | — | — | WEAK ORE-BEARING | — |
| Late stage of emplacement of the complex | Ore fields of batholiths. | Satellite stocks, not directly connected with large bodies of granitoids; exceeding 0.5–1.0 km in size. | Gabbro-diorites, diorites, granodiorites; quartz diorites, granodiorites, gneiss-granites, granites, alaskites. Subalkaline intrusive series. | Small; ore bodies are concentrated at a distance of 0.5 km or more from intrusive bodies. | Skarns, skarnoids; discontinuous quartz veins; quartz–sulfide veins; dioritoid satellite stocks. | 3. Ores of mineralized skarns and quartz veins of dioritoid satellite stocks. | Natal’evskoe, Lebedovskoe, Solnechnoe, Kuzninskii Alatau. |
| Late stage of emplacement of the complex | Ore fields and dikes in exocontacts of granitoid batholiths. | Phases of diorites and acid rocks, characterizing the final stage of development of a large intrusive mass: dikes and small intrusions. | Diorites and acid rocks: dikes, linear stocks, and stocks. | Up to 1.0–1.5 km. Root parts of stocks gravitate toward ore zones. | Gold- and base-metal quartz veins and lenticular bodies in endocontacts of batholiths. | 4. Ore bodies of quartz veins and ore-bearing intrusions with intrusions in the endocontacts of batholiths. | Sukhoi Log; Mul’dzhik; Kongor; Stanislavskoe; Vostochnyi Ca; Kok-Patakskoe; Berezovskoe; Kazanskii Alatau. |
| Late stage of emplacement of the complex | Post-batholithic and near-batholithic dikes, belts of dikes; dikes of various composition: from basic to acidic, with subvolcanic appearance. | Small intrusive bodies and dikes, predominantly of the diorite–aplitoid series, with associated acidic rocks. | Small bodies and dikes: diorites, granodiorites, granites; also effusives of acid composition. | From 0.5 km to 1.5–2.0 km; ore bodies occupy parts of stocks; deep sections of stockworks are represented only by disseminated sulfide ores. | Small and mesothermal quartz veins; low-sulfide quartz veins; veins of gold–sulfide–carbonate ores; stockworks and disseminations and ore-bearing dikes. | 5. Ore bodies of quartz veins associated with intrusive and effusive rocks of diorite–granite and ore-bearing dike series. | Stibnite, Ajjkabazet, Buolimo, MKS; Northern Kazakhstan. |
| Late stage of emplacement of the complex | Continuation of belts and extensive dikes in volcanogenic areas, in stock-like granitoid massifs. Such zones are most often represented by small bodies of monzonites, diorites, granodiorites, tonalites, and granites; a) in alkaline areas; b) in areas of granitoids situated away from batholiths. | Simple belts and spaces of dikes in belts in postskarn, silicic, variously displaced fault zones; in carbonatized, albitized and siliceous rocks, from alkaline granitoid areas. | Simple and complex dikes of diverse phase composition: acidic quartz porphyries, aplites, rhyolites; granitoid porphyries; dikes of diorite composition; albite–biotite metasomatites from alkaline granitoid areas. | Up to 2–3 km or more. | Bodies of quartz veins, disseminated bodies, and stockworks of ore bodies: a) roots in deep parts of batholiths; b) bodies in apical parts (?) of concealed batholiths. | 6. Bodies of quartz veins and disseminations; in the case of deep erosional truncation: a) roots in deep parts of batholiths; b) bodies in apical parts (?) of concealed batholiths. | Komsomol, Dzhentgara, Tsentral’noe; Berezovskoe, Bakyrchik. |