On the Issue of Qualitative Sampling of Minerals During Well Drilling
Full Text
On the Qualitative Sampling of Minerals During Well Drilling
S. S. Sulakshin, V. G. Khramenkov
The problem of obtaining qualitative core samples in a quantity sufficient for investigations, which is of great practical importance, includes two fundamental questions:
a) determining the moment at which the beds or deposits of minerals under study are encountered;
b) obtaining and preserving qualitative samples in the required quantity.
Both of these questions have so far been far from fully resolved, especially the determination of the moment at which beds (deposits) of minerals are encountered.
On the other hand, an analysis of certain questions of sampling minerals shows the possibility of solving them with incomplete core recovery. But the necessary minimum quantity of core can be determined only for specific conditions, taking into account a whole series of factors, the principal ones being the physicomechanical properties and the character of the distribution of the mineral (Table 1).
All rocks and minerals, according to the difficulty of obtaining core during rotary core drilling of wells, may be divided into four main groups, taking into account the character of the bond between the particles composing them and their behavior under the influence of various factors in the process of drilling the well and raising the core (Table 2).
For obtaining rock specimens and mineral samples, many drilling methods and means have been developed (Table 3), and a large number of tools have been created (Table 4); however, far from all of them meet the requirements from the standpoint of obtaining representative samples (specimens).
For determining the moment at which beds are encountered, reliable signaling devices are practically absent, although there are many possible ways of solving this important question (Table 5). The possibility of using, for this purpose, developed instruments indicating the mechanical drilling speed does not solve the problem.
factors determining the formation, recovery, and quality of core in rotary core drilling of wells
(after S. S. Sulakshin)
CORE CLASSIFICATION SCHEME
Table 1
| Category | Factors determining the formation, recovery, and quality of core | Procedure and useful minerals in forming the name of the core |
|---|---|---|
| Geological | Mineralogical composition, structure, and texture of rocks. Presence of veinlets and inclusions. | Loss of connection between grains or individual parts of the core. |
| Geological | Physical and anisotropic properties of rocks: strength, hardness, abrasiveness, layering, cleavage, fissility, cavernosity, moisture capacity, density, thermal conductivity, solubility, etc. | Destruction and abrasion of soft interlayers and sections. Loosening or compaction of rocks. Dissolution or leaching of minerals. Dissolution of friable rocks. |
| Geological | Angle of occurrence of formations with the plane of the face, faults, cracks, etc. | |
| Technical | Drilling method. | Mechanical deformation and mechanical destruction of the core: chipping, crushing, fragmentation, self-wedging. |
| Technical | Type of downhole tools, their design and parameters. | |
| Technical | Magnitude of the clearance between the bit and the walls of the well. | Abrasion along the lateral surface or along the planes of lamination, schistosity, fractures, etc. |
| Technical | Method of removal of destruction products. | Washing away of the core. |
| Technical | Method of wedging the core. | Reduction of the core diameter and of its strength. |
| Technical | Design of the drill string and its quality (eccentricity, ovality, bending, etc.). |
Continuation of Table 1
| Group | Factors determining the formation, recovery, and quality of the core | Behavior of rocks or useful minerals during the formation and extraction of the core |
|---|---|---|
| Technological | Drilling regime: axial load, number of revolutions, quantity of flushing fluid, method of feeding shot into the borehole, working the core barrel up and down. | Mechanical destruction of the core due to vibration, jolts, and impacts of the drilling tool, as well as due to the action of the flushing-fluid stream; reduction of the core diameter and its strength. |
| Technological | Quality of the flushing fluid. | Dissolution in the flushing fluid. |
| Technological | Duration of actual drilling time and run length per trip. | Removal of fine particles by the stream of flushing fluid or air. |
| Technological | Method of lifting the core barrel from the borehole. | Loss and destruction of pieces of core when working the tool up and down. |
| Technological | Silting of the borehole and other complications. | Leaving the core in the borehole when wedging is poor. Loss of core from the core barrel during its lifting. |
| Organizational | Availability of a section design and its reliability. | Reduction in the degree of influence of factors that worsen the conditions of core formation. |
| Organizational | Availability of monitoring and measuring instruments. | Reduction in the degree of influence of factors that worsen the conditions of core formation. |
| Organizational | Availability of rational means for core sampling and their technical condition. | Reduction in the degree of influence of factors that worsen the conditions of core formation. |
| Organizational | Qualification of the drilling personnel. | Reduction in the degree of influence of factors that worsen the conditions of core formation. |
| Organizational | Monitoring compliance with the principal requirements and recommendations for core sampling. | Reduction in the degree of influence of factors that worsen the conditions of core formation. |
Table 2
CLASSIFICATION SCHEME
of rocks and minerals by the difficulty of obtaining samples (core)
(according to S. S. Sulakshin)
| Group of rocks by difficulty of obtaining samples (core) | Characteristics of the principal properties of rocks that determine sample (core) recovery | Behavior during drilling and sample extraction | Typical representatives of this group | Means of obtaining samples (core) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Very unstable rocks | Rocks and minerals that practically have no bonding between grains, with high strength of the individual particles; loose, free-flowing and quicksand-like materials of various granulometric composition; highly crumpled or crushed and highly fractured hard rocks (broken by a complex system of cracks). | During drilling, particles move in the manner of loose materials. Fine grains are easily carried out of the core barrel by the drilling fluid. The loose mass may become strongly compacted in the core barrel, forming a plug. Large particles (fragments) are broken up, abraded, and rounded. | Loose unconsolidated sedimentary rocks, chiefly products of physical weathering: sand, pebbles, gravel, crushed stone, quicksands, etc. Highly crumpled, crushed, or highly fractured hard rocks. | Special drilling methods and tools with local circulation of fluid; double core barrels with flushing by clay mud. Drilling with augers and bailers. Collection of sludge. |
| Weakly stable rocks | Rocks and minerals with an insufficiently strong bond, heterogeneous in strength; bonded by weak cement, or brittle rocks of low hardness; affected by weathering; interbedded (with layers of differing hardness), schistose or layered with weak bonding between layers; broken by a single system of cracks; with veinlets, etc. | They are easily destroyed under the mechanical action of all factors accompanying the drilling process and core extraction, leading to core losses and selective abrasion. In some cases they are washed away by the drilling fluid. Selective abrasion increases during drilling with air flushing (dry friction). When drilling with insufficient cooling, the core becomes scorched. When extracted from the core barrel, the core is easily deformed. | Weakly cemented breccias and conglomerates; coals. Layered rocks with alternating hardness, penetrated by soft veinlets, etc. | Double core barrels used with clay-mud flushing. Tools with local circulation of fluid (without reciprocation). Collection of sludge in settling tanks. Collection of sludge with a bailer. |
Continuation of Table 2.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocks with variable stability. | Rocks that are useful and connected, predominantly of essentially consolidated or formed composition, more often inundated during water saturation. Usually dense, of low porosity, often moisture-bearing. Sometimes viscous, sticky, strongly porous: a) clays and clayey formations; b) soluble salts; c) frozen loose rocks. | They soften or dissolve under the action of drilling fluid. Some varieties, when moistened, swell, which in the wellbore may be forcibly counteracted, and this slows down the extraction. Frozen rocks thaw when raised; the core loses its natural distinctness. | Sedimentary rocks (mainly products of chemical weathering or chemical sedimentation): clays, clay shales, loess, clayey bauxites, rock salt, etc. Skarn, strongly fissured rocks (containing individual inclusions capable of dissolution or melting—ice in the form of veins and nests) and loose porous rocks in which water is found in the pores or contacts between particles. | Drilling with muds of ordinary composition, with washing by saline or special solutions, clay slurries, chilled or lowered-temperature slurries. In separate cases air flushing may be applied. |
| Loose stable rocks. | Rocks that are useful and connected with a rigid, predominantly crystallizational bond between grains; composed of cemented, sufficiently strong, monolithic or weakly fractured, non-weathered material. | During drilling in rational regimes practically always yield increased core recovery (up to 100%). | Clastic and semi-rock rocks: limestones, sedimentary sandstone (dense sandy), and metamorphic, metamorphic rocks (gneisses, quartzites, marble, crystalline shales, etc.). | Skarn and semi-rock rocks. Sedimentary (dense sandstones) and metamorphic rocks (gneisses, quartzites, marble, crystalline shales, etc.). |
Table 3
CLASSIFICATION
of methods and technical means for obtaining samples of useful minerals and cuttings during well drilling
(according to S. S. Sulakshin)
| Methods of sampling cuttings and samples | Means of sampling and samples | |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling of cuttings (core) from the well during drilling | Cuttings obtained by flushing or blowing during continuous circulation of liquid or air in the well. | I. Simple slurry collectors (PS). II. Double slurry collectors (DShS) with an unchangeable core receiver: 1. DShS with a rotating inner pipe. 2. DShS with a nonrotating inner pipe. 3. DShS of the combined type (with a rotating and nonrotating inner pipe during drilling). III. Double slurry collectors with a replaceable core-receiving pipe: 1. DShS with a rotating replaceable core-receiving pipe. 2. DShS with a nonrotating replaceable pipe. IV. Double slurry collectors with a sealed core-receiving pipe—for the recovery of core and gas (GTS). |
| Sampling of cuttings (core) from the well during drilling | Cuttings operating with continuous circulation of liquid (SNL). | I. Cuttings with local circulation of liquid and a slurry channel for safe drilling. II. Cuttings with local circulation of liquid with a piston. |
| Sampling of cuttings (core) from the well during drilling | Cuttings operating with combined circulation of liquid (SKTs). | I. Cuttings with local circulation of liquid, effected by means of a downhole pump driven by the liquid flow (air), supplied from the surface. II. Cuttings with local circulation of liquid by the action of a water-jet pump operating with the use of a pump on the surface. III. Cuttings with local circulation effected by rapidly displacing the liquid with compressed air (with a pulsating flush). IV. Cuttings with siphon flushing. |
Continuation of Table 3.
| Sampling method | Instruments, mechanisms, or devices | Instruments and devices |
|---|---|---|
| Instruments operating without flushing or blowing (dry). | I. Rotary-action instruments. 1. Spirals, spoons, augers. 2. Rotary-action soil samplers. 3. Auger core-barrel instruments. II. Percussion-action instruments. 1. Bailers, cups. 2. Driven soil samplers. 3. Vibration instruments (vibration bailers, vibration cups). |
|
| Sampling of specimens and samples from the walls of boreholes after their drilling | Instruments (mechanisms) of cutting action | 1. Scrapers, reamers. 2. Sidewall core samplers (soil samplers) of the rotary core-barrel type (BKV). |
| Sampling of specimens and samples from the walls of boreholes after their drilling | Instruments (mechanisms) of pressing action | 1. Sidewall core samplers (soil samplers), mechanical (BKM). |
| Sampling of specimens and samples from the walls of boreholes after their drilling | Percussion-action instruments | 1. Sidewall core samplers (soil samplers) of the shooting type (BKS). |
| Sampling of specimens and samples from the walls of boreholes after their drilling | Instruments of thermodynamic action | 1. Sidewall core samplers (soil samplers) of the thermodynamic (cumulative) type (BKT). |
| Collection of sludge samples | Sludge-catching devices used at the surface | 1. Sludge-catching troughs and settling tanks. 2. Sludge catchers of the cyclone type (turbocyclones, hydrocyclones, pneumocyclones). |
| Collection of sludge samples | Instruments and devices for lifting sludge from the borehole bottom | 1. Sludge-catching pipes and devices. 2. Bailers. |
Table 4
CLASSIFICATION SCHEME
of core-sampling tools used for obtaining core samples in rotary drilling of geological-exploration wells under complex geological conditions
(after S. S. Sulakshin)
| Group | Type of core barrel | Connection of the inner core tube with the sub | Method of removing drilling products | Method of forming the sample (core) | Method of retaining the sample (core) | Means of preserving the sample (core) | Designation of typical designs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Tools operating with direct flushing, pumped from the surface by a pump | DKS with an inner tube rotating during drilling | Rigid (movement in the axial direction is possible) | Direct flushing by means of a pump | Cutting around with a bit | By friction wedging (jamming) or by a core breaker | Core-receiving tube | DKS of the designs of K. F. Novazh, K. S. Mazoevich, D. T. Raikov et al.; KGN, type VK-54; KS-2. |
| Tools operating with direct flushing, pumped from the surface by a pump | DKS with a non-rotating inner tube | Movable, with the possibility of moving the tube relative to the other in the axial direction | Direct flushing by means of a pump | Cutting around with the outer bit or cutting out with a die | By means of core-gripping devices | Core-receiving tube | DKS-1-TPI, DKS-3-TPI, DKS-D of the design of S. S. Sulakshin; DKS-MGRI; designs of VITR (“dies”); E. P. Kramar and Dr. DKS with replaceable core receptacle of the designs of TsKB, MGRI, “Krelius,” “Longyear,” etc. |
| Tools operating with direct flushing, pumped from the surface by a pump | DKS with a non-rotating inner tube | Movable, with the possibility of moving the tube relative to the other in the axial direction | Direct flushing by means of a pump | Cutting around with the outer bit or cutting out with a die | By means of core-gripping devices | Core-receiving sleeve | KGN, type MakNII; KG-55; designs of V. D. Matveev, S. E. Alekseenko, I. B. Bunaev, and others. |
Continuation of Table 4.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DKS of the combined type (with an inner tube rotating during drilling in hard rocks and non-rotating during drilling in soft rocks) | Combined | Flushing by means of a pump | Drilling around or cutting out with a die | By means of core-catching devices | Core-receiving tube | DT-10-89 tool designed by A. G. Grebenyuk. A. S. Pokalchuk’s tool | |
| Tools with local (near-bit or direct and reverse flushing) | Safe-drilling tools (with local circulation of fluid) | Rigid | Near-bit flushing by reciprocating the tool (piston) | Drilling around with a bit | Clay layer—by rubbing in, or by a core-catching device | Core barrel | S. A. Volkov’s tool; S. S. Sulakshin’s tool; A. A. Grebenyuk’s tool; A. A. Voliktenkov’s tool; A. S. Pokalchuk’s tool |
| Tools with local (near-bit or direct and reverse flushing) | Safe-drilling tools (with local circulation of fluid) | Movable | Near-bit flushing by reciprocating the piston | Drilling around with a bit | Core-catching device | Core-receiving tube | A. A. Grebenyuk’s tool |
| Tools with local (near-bit or direct and reverse flushing) | Tools with combined flushing | Rigid | Near-bit flushing by means of a water-jet-type pump | Drilling around with a bit | Bottom-hole core-catching device | Core barrel or core-receiving tube | Tool of N. S. Levchenko and S. A. Turko. Tools of Kaz. IMS; SGI tool; tools of the Kosmolskaya expedition. V. E. Kopytov’s tool |
| Tools with local (near-bit or direct and reverse flushing) | Tools for drilling with flushing by means of an air lift | Rigid | Near-bit flushing by means of an air lift | Drilling around with a bit | Core-catching device | Core barrel | VITR tool. SGI tool |
Continuation of Table 4.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tools with local circulation by displacement of the fluid with compressed air or a piston | Rigid | With near-bottom pulsating flushing | Cutting around with a bit | By wedging | Core barrel | V. V. Bolshakov tool; SGI tool | |
| Tools for dry drilling | Tools for drilling without flushing | Movable or rigid | With an auger | Cutting around with a bit | By friction force | Core-receiving tube | Simple auger-shoe tools (F. A. Shamishev) and tools with a removable core receiver |
CLASSIFICATION
of the principal methods and means of monitoring the moment of encounter with contacts of mineral deposits
Table 5
| Methods for monitoring the moment of encounter with contacts of a deposit | Principal indicators and means for determining the moment of encounter with contacts of mineral deposits |
|---|---|
| Monitoring of the moment of encounter with contacts of a deposit | 1. Depth of occurrence of the contact. 2. Character of the cuttings, color, and other properties of the drilling fluid flowing out of the borehole. |
| Monitoring by geological indicators | 1. Visually or with the aid of a stopwatch. 2. Instruments connected with elements of the drilling rig that have reciprocating-translational motion: a) with the rig rack — the instrument of V. M. Slavsky and B. E. Sveshnikov, the VSEGEI penetration recorder; b) with the guide rod of rotation — the penetration recorder of G. L. Lebedinsky, the penetration-rate sensor and recorder of the type DS SKB of the Ministry of Geology of the USSR, the drilling stopwatch of KazIMSa, the drilling recorder of KazIMSa, an instrument for measuring the drilling rate and the amount of penetration of KazIMSa; c) with the traverse of the rotary head — the autorecorder of E. I. Abramina, a drilling-rate meter of A. A. Zhukovsky, an instrument for mechanical logging (SHA); d) with the drive chain — the recorder of P. I. Fedotov; e) with the swivel — the instrument of B. M. Slavsky and B. E. Sveshnikov, the recorder of drilling duration (SHA); f) with the traveling block — a remote recording instrument (SHA); g) with the rope of the traveling block feed branch — a recorder of the parameters of the drilling process (SHA). 3. Instruments connected with elements of the drilling rig that have rotational motion: a) with the axis or roller of the crown block — an instrument with an angle induction sensor, an instrument with selsyn coupling, a mechanical depth gauge (SHA); b) with the shaft or drum of the winch — the acoustic signalizer of N. I. Martyntseva, |
| Monitoring by changes in the mechanical properties of rocks (resistance of rocks to failure) | Measurement of drilling rate Measurement of drilling rate [[unclear: continuation cut off]] |
Continuation of Table 5
| Method | Content |
|---|---|
| 4. Instruments connected with the hydraulic system of the drilling rig or of the hydraulic cylinder: a) hydraulic indicator of G. F. Pavlov; b) flowmeters—drilling-speed meters: C-TPI indicator, differential pressure gauges. |
|
| Recording changes in hydrostatic pressure in the rig’s hydraulic system or in the weight indicator. | 1. Instruments connected with the rig’s hydraulic system: a) pressure sensor of type DD SKB MG USSR; b) indicator of device TT-18; c) manometer and drilling-rig indicator; d) manometer of a rig with a movable contact. 2. Weight indicators and pressure gauges: a) built into the stationary end of the drilling-rope cable—mechanical, hydraulic, electric, selsyn, tensometric; b) built into the running end of the cable; c) weight sensor built into the sheave hook; d) hydraulic dynamometers built between the vertical swivel-seal and the lifting hook. |
| Measurement of torque or power used for drilling. | 1. Recorder of torque readings of instrument TT-18. 2. Contactless electromagnetic sensor of torque meters of type DM. 3. Instrument for recording drilling power. 4. Hydraulic indicator of torques. 5. Downhole torque sensors with signaling device. Measurement of the elastic energy of the drill string during drilling. |
| Control by changes in the physical properties of rocks | Measurement of the physical properties of cuttings, core, instruments, and transmission of the signal to the surface. |
| Control by changes in the chemical properties of rocks | Measurement of the chemical composition, microcomponents, or hardness directly at the face or on the surface. |
The Department of Exploration Technology of the Tomsk Polytechnic Institute has been working for a number of years on solving the problem of qualitative sampling of minerals during the drilling of geological-exploration wells.
As a result, the theoretical foundations of certain questions of the problem under consideration were developed, and a set of means was created for taking qualitative core samples when drilling wells for coal: a double core barrel (DKS-TPI) and a bed-encounter indicator (S-TPI).
The universal double core barrel DKS-TPI (Fig. 1) is intended for re-drilling mineral beds of simple and complex structure, from weak to strong. The barrel, of telescopic type, has a shutoff hydraulic device and a core bit made of four steel sectors. The universality of the barrel is determined by fulfillment of the developed requirements, the principal ones being the following.
-
The possibility of flushing the bottom of the well before drilling begins through the inner core barrel and the clearance between the pipes.
-
The use, as the flushing fluid, of both technical water and clay mud.
-
Isolation of the core from the action of the flow of flushing fluid.
-
Free (without back pressure) discharge of fluid from the inner pipe as it is filled with core.
-
Free advance of the core into the inner pipe.
-
Protection of the core from the destructive action of mechanical factors (friction forces, vibrations, shocks, and impacts of the barrel) due to the immobility of the inner pipe during drilling.
-
The possibility of drilling through strong coals and rocks (interbeds of barren rocks occurring in coal seams, in the floor and roof).
-
Drilling at forced regimes.
-
Reliable wedging and breaking off of the core at the bottom in soft and hard rocks by a floating core lifter of sector type.
-
The possibility of monitoring the moment of core wedging before lifting the barrel.
-
Reliable retention of the core in the core barrel during lifting, both in vertical and inclined wells.
-
Protection of the core-lifting device from mechanical damage during lowering and raising of the barrel.
-
Draining of the flushing fluid from the cavity of the drill pipes when raising the barrel from the well.
-
Free extraction of the core from the detachable core-receiving pipe without disturbing its integrity.
-
The possibility of making a run of more than 1.5 m.
-
Simplicity of design and low cost of the barrel.
Tests of the barrels showed that they make it possible to substantially increase core recovery. In most cases at deposits of the Kuzbass, core recovery was obtained within the range of 85–100%.
Technical characteristics of the DKS-TPI double core barrel
| No. | Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Drilling depth, m | 1200 |
| 2. | Outer diameter of the bit, mm | 92 |
| 3. | Inner diameter of the bit, mm | 60 |
| 4. | Useful length of the core receiver, m | 2.0 |
| 5. | Total length of the barrel, m | 2.62 |
| 6. | Weight of the barrel, kg | 46 |
Section along I–I
Section along II–II
Section along III–III
View along A
Fig. 1. Double core-barrel assembly DKS-TPI: 1—adapter; 2—cylinder; 3—sealing washer; 4—seal; 5—body; 6—locking plug; 7—locking ball; 8—spindle; 9—spring; 10—thrust nut; 11—ball for shutting off the central flushing channel; 12—adjusting screw; 13—locknut; 14—outer tube; 15—seal; 16—washer; 17—lifter body; 18—lifter ball; 19—lifter; 20—locknut; 21—core-receiver head; 22—core receiver; 23—side cover of the core receiver; 24—receiving cup; 25—bit; 26—gate; 27—spring of the core breaker; 28—sector of the core breaker; 29—body of the core breaker; 30—cutters of form G-1305; 31—ball of the hydraulic seal; 32—plug.
The C-TPI coal-bed encounter indicator is a device that indicates the type of mechanical drilling speed. An increase in drilling speed upon encountering beds of minerals is registered by the instrument—the electrical circuit is actuated, and light and sound signals are switched on.
The indicator is intended for rigs with hydraulic feed, ZIF-300 and ZIF-650A, and in principle may be used on any rig with hydraulic feed.
Measurement of drilling speed is carried out by the consumption of oil displaced from the lower cavities of the feed hydraulic cylinders during the synchronous downward movement of the pistons with the swivel. Therefore, an obligatory condition for use of the indicator is feed of the tool with the spindle.
The indicator consists of a mechanical drilling-speed sensor—a float-type flowmeter—and a control-and-signal panel with an audible signal (bell or siren). The sensor is installed in a break in the oil line running from the lower cavities of the feed hydraulic cylinders to the hydraulic-control device; the control-and-signal panel is installed in a place visible to the drilling foreman.
Fig. 2 shows the sensor diagram and the block diagram of the indicator.
Fig. 2. Coal-bed encounter indicator C-TPI: a—diagram of the mechanical drilling-speed sensor; b—block diagram of the indicator; 1—float; 2—core; 3—two-section induction coil; 4—check valve; D—signal sensor; I—measuring instrument; P1—rig-type switch; P2—encounter control-speed switch; MU—magnetic amplifier; EMR—electromechanical relay; RV—electronic time relay; SP—signaling devices; BP—power-supply unit.
The operation of the sensor is as follows. Oil, passing through the sensor, raises float 1 (Fig. 2, a) with core 2, which enters induction coil 3. The two-section coil constitutes two adjacent arms of a bridge differential-transformer circuit. A measuring instrument I is connected into the diagonal of the bridge (Fig. 2, b). The instrument readings depend on the degree of unbalance of the bridge circuit, i.e., on the magnitude of insertion (height of rise) of the core into the lower section of the coil, which is determined by the oil flow rate, proportional to the rate of deepening. During all stops of the spindle and during its upward motion, the float with the core occupies the lower position, and the instrument indicates zero. When the spindle moves upward, the oil passes through check valve 4.
The signal from sensor D is amplified by magnetic amplifier MU and is fed to the input of electromechanical relay EMR, which operates when the threshold value of the signal is reached and switches on signaling devices SP. The signaling device makes it possible to set in advance (switch P2) the check rate of bed encounter, i.e., the rate at which coal beds are expected to be encountered in the given deposit. When the set rate is reached, the signal at the input of EMR also reaches its threshold value.
When the signaling device is installed on one of the drilling rigs, switch P1, which has markings for rig types, is placed in the corresponding position.
Temporary (15 sec) switching off of the signals during lowering of the tool (high rate of spindle lowering) is achieved by introducing an electronic time relay RV into the circuit. The normally closed relay button is installed on the instrument panel of the rig.
Power for the signaling-device circuit is supplied from a 220-volt AC mains. The power-supply unit BP of the signaling device includes a voltage stabilizer, making it possible to obtain correct readings when the supply voltage varies within ±30%.
Technical characteristics of the signaling device
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Type | S-TPI |
| Drilling rig | ZIF-300, ZIF-650A |
| Measurement range, cm/min | 0--40 |
| Scale division value, cm/min | 1 |
| Check encounter rates, cm/min | 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 25, 30, 35, 40 |
| Accuracy of readings, % | ±10 |
| Signal | visual, audible |
| Supply voltage | 220 V ±30% |
| Power consumption, W | 130 |
| Operating range of air temperature, °C | −15--+55 |
| Maximum dimensions, mm: console | 318×200×200 |
| Maximum dimensions, mm: sensor | 265×64 |
| Weight, kg: console | 11.0 |
| Weight, kg: sensor | 3.3 |
Tests of the signaling devices were carried out in geological exploration parties of the Kuzbassuglegeologiya Trust: in 1965, in the Uropskaya GRP; in 1966--1967, in the Leninskaya GRP. Five signaling devices had been in operation since August 1967 in the Leninskaya GRP.
The tests were carried out on ZIF-650A rigs. The rocks of the sites are represented by sandy-clayey varieties from coarse-grained sandstones to fine aleurolites and argillites, carbonaceous argillites
and coals of medium hardness. The average drillability category of the rocks is the fifth. The time-study observations of the instruments, carried out in parallel with the tests, were made under practically specified drilling regimes with carbide bits of the CA, CM, and BT types: axial load—700–1200 kg, flushing intensity—100–150 l/min, number of revolutions of the tool with the principal bit diameter of 92 mm—250–480 per minute.
As of December 1967, 11,300 linear m of boreholes had been drilled using the signal device; 1,690 rig-shifts had been worked; 290 seams had been encountered; 9 seams had been missed, with two misses of seams of workable thickness occurring because of a malfunction of the sound signal; the reasons for seven misses of seams of nonworkable thickness have not been established.
The tests showed the effectiveness of using the signal device at specific deposits. The exposure of all seams was clearly recorded by the instrument. As a result of the tests, the fundamental possibility was established of distinguishing easily drillable rocks (usually coarse-grained sandstones) from coals by the amplitude of fluctuations in instantaneous drilling rates: for rocks it is ±10–15 cm/min, whereas for coals it is more often within the range of 2–3 cm/min. The noted smooth increase in drilling rate along a thin (5–10 cm) supercoal interbed makes it possible, when seams are encountered, to reduce the drilling interval to 5–10 cm instead of 20–30 cm.
The use of the signal device also makes it possible to select the most rational drilling regimes according to mechanical speed.
The signal device is simple to handle and reliable in operation. The combined use of the S-TPI signal devices and DKS-TPI double core barrels will make it possible to substantially improve the quality of sampling of coal seams.