Study of the Magnetic Field in the Air Gap of a DC Motor Operating Under Load

K. A. KHORKOV, V. N. DMITRIEV, E. E. DUTLOV
Submitted 1974 | SovietRxiv: ru-197401.13652 | Translated from Russian

Abstract Generated abstract

This paper reports an experimental study of the alternating magnetic field component in the air gap of a loaded DC motor with a toothed, skewed armature. Using a G-40 motor and e.m.f. measuring sensors placed across pole shoes and along their leading and trailing edges, the authors measured flux pulsations as armature current increased from no load to rated load for armatures with 27 and 31 slots. The results show that tooth pulsations of the total flux under the poles increase approximately in proportion to armature current, while armature reaction redistributes the main flux, increasing pulsations at the leading edge and leaving the trailing edge nearly unchanged, with the pattern reversing when rotation is reversed. The study links this growing asymmetry in magnetic attraction to increased uncompensated radial and tangential forces and, consequently, greater machine vibration.

Full Text

Proceedings
of the Tomsk Order of the October Revolution
and Order of the Red Banner of Labor
Polytechnic Institute named after S. M. Kirov

Vol. 284
1974

STUDY OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD IN THE AIR GAP OF A DC MOTOR OPERATING UNDER LOAD

K. A. KHORKOV, V. N. DMITRIEV, E. E. DUTLOV

(Presented by the scientific seminar of the Departments of Electrical Machines and Apparatus and General Electrical Engineering)

In order to study the alternating component of the magnetic field under the pole during the motion of a toothed armature, an experimental installation was created on the basis of a G-40 motor. The results of studies during operation of the motor in no-load mode were set out by us in [1]. In the present work, results are given of studies of the magnetic field during operation of the DC motor under load. The armatures of the machi-

Fig. 1. Arrangement of measuring sensors

Fig. 1. Arrangement of measuring sensors

nes have 27 and 31 slots with a skew of one tooth pitch. During the tests, the motor speed was maintained constant and equal to 1500 rpm; the excitation current was equal to 1 A. The armature current was varied from the no-load current of 2.3 A to the rated current of 20 A.

The measuring e.m.f. sensors were installed on the pole shoes of the machine according to Fig. 1. The arrangement of the sensors along the width of the pole shoe makes it possible to trace the change in flux on the surface of the pole during the motion of the toothed armature. On pole 1 the width of the sensor frames is equal to the width of an armature tooth; on pole 2, to the width of the open armature slots. The placement of the sensors on the edges of the poles (pole 3) makes it possible to analyze the change in flux along the length of the leading and trailing edges of the pole shoe. Frame 4–10

encompasses the entire pole shoe along its perimeter and makes it possible to judge the radial pulsations of the magnetic flux as a whole under the entire pole. A typical e.m.f. curve of a sensor located under a pole is shown in Fig. 2, curve 3. Curve 3 is obtained as the sum of the e.m.f. curves of the sides of the measuring frame (curves 1 and 2). It is obvious that the amplitude of the sensor e.m.f. characterizes the magnitude of the alternating component of the magnetic field under the pole. The width of the measuring coil must not be equal to the width of the armature tooth pitch, since in this case the resultant e.m.f. of the sensor is zero. The width of the measuring coil must lie within the limits from \(b_{\mathrm{p}}\) to \(b_{\mathrm{z}}\), and with increasing frame width the amplitude of the sensor e.m.f. decreases because of the influence of the skew of the armature slots.

Fig. 2. Formation of the e.m.f. curve of the measuring sensor

Fig. 2. Formation of the e.m.f. curve of the measuring sensor

In the machine under test, the width of the pole shoe is 4.7 tooth pitches for an armature having 31 teeth, and 4.1 pitches for an armature with 27 teeth. Therefore the e.m.f. curves of the measuring coils contain an entire spectrum of higher harmonics, the largest of which is the tooth harmonic.

In the investigations, the armature current was increased from the no-load current to the rated current of the machine. Accordingly, owing to the influence of armature reaction, redistribution of the main flux of the machine occurs under the pole: the flux at the leading edge of the pole increases, while that at the trailing edge decreases. The influence of the redistribution of the main flux on the magnitude of the tooth pulsations under the pole can be traced from the measurement results presented in Tables 1 and 2. The tables give the e.m.f. of each sensor in millivolts and the average e.m.f. values for sensors of the same type when the armature rotates in both directions, as a function of the armature current.

As was to be expected, the amplitude of the tooth pulsations of the total flux under the poles varies practically in proportion to the magnitude of the armature current. Of interest is the pattern of change in the e.m.f. of the sensors placed at the leading (sensors 12a—12d) and trailing (sensors 1a—1d) edges of the pole shoe when the armature rotates in the forward direction. When the load is increased to rated, for the sensors at the leading edge of the pole (magnetized by the flux of the armature reaction) a uniform threefold increase in their e.m.f. is observed. At the same time, the e.m.f. of the sensors at the trailing edge of the pole, demagnetized by armature reaction, remains practically unchanged.

When the direction of rotation of the armature is changed, the leading and trailing edges of the pole change places, and the e.m.f. of sensors 12a—12d becomes unchanged, while the e.m.f. of sensors 1a—1d grows in the same proportion as before for the leading edge of the pole. For both armatures, the pattern of change in the sensor e.m.f. is analogous.

An increase in the amplitude of the magnetic-field pulsations under the leading edge of the pole should correspondingly increase the forces of the magnetic

Table 1

The armature has 27 tooth divisions

Pole No. Sensor No. Direct rotation: xx Direct rotation: 5 a Direct rotation: 10 a Direct rotation: 15 a Direct rotation: 20 a Reverse rotation: xx Reverse rotation: 10 a Reverse rotation: 20 a
1 4—10 20 70 120 180 220 20 100 180
2 4—10 20 70 100 160 260 20 60 130
3 4—10 15 100 200 280 340 10 80 180
4 4—10 50 100 180 220 220 50 100 260
average 26 85 150 210 260 25 85 187
3 1 a 220 200 180 180 210 200 300 500
3 1 b 240 200 180 180 210 200 320 500
3 1 c 260 220 210 200 230 220 340 480
3 1 d 260 260 220 220 280 230 360 520
3 1 e 280 280 250 250 320 250 320 430
average 250 270 210 205 250 220 330 498
3 12 a 220 300 400 500 620 260 220 240
3 12 b 220 280 360 480 600 240 200 240
3 12 c 160 220 300 400 480 200 120 200
3 12 d 180 260 320 460 560 200 140 200
3 12 e 180 260 360 520 620 200 140 220
average 192 264 348 472 576 220 164 220
2 1 200 230 300 330 420 210 260 420
2 2 180 200 230 320 380 180 260 420
2 3 140 160 220 300 380 140 200 330
average 173 196 250 316 393 176 240 390
1 1 150 220 260 260 260 150 110 100
1 2 50 110 180 320 360 60 90 110
1 3 30 40 60 100 120 30 20 120
1 4 30 40 60 100 120 20 80 210
1 5 100 104 136 180 198 78 90 148
average 72 104 136 180 198 78 90 148

Table 2

The armature has 31 tooth divisions

Pole No. Sensor No. Direct rotation: xx Direct rotation: 5 a Direct rotation: 7.5 a Direct rotation: 10 a Direct rotation: 15 a Reverse rotation: xx Reverse rotation: 5 a Reverse rotation: 10 a Reverse rotation: 15 a Reverse rotation: 20 a
1 4—10 0 50 100 150 230 0 20 60 110 180
2 4—10 0 0 20 40 120 0 10 50 100 160
3 4—10 40 60 120 150 230 40 60 120 210 300
4 4—10 60 40 80 110 200 60 80 160 220 280
average 25 37.5 80 112 195 25 42.5 97.5 160 230

Continuation of Table 2

Pole No. Sensor No. Direct rotation: xx Direct rotation: 5 a Direct rotation: 7.5 a Direct rotation: 10 a Direct rotation: 15 a Reverse rotation: xx Reverse rotation: 5 a Reverse rotation: 7.5 a Reverse rotation: 10 a Reverse rotation: 15 a
3 1 а 240 220 200 180 210 210 260 360 460 560
3 1 б 230 210 180 160 200 200 250 360 440 540
3 1 в 230 240 210 200 220 200 290 380 440 560
3 1 г 250 250 230 200 230 220 290 350 440 520
3 1 д 260 260 230 220 260 210 290 340 400 520
average 242 236 210 192 224 208 278 354 436 540
3 12 а 200 280 400 400 600 180 180 200 220 280
3 12 б 180 280 400 400 560 180 180 200 220 280
3 12 в 180 260 360 360 520 160 120 120 160 200
3 12 г 180 240 320 320 500 120 120 160 160 200
3 12 д 160 240 320 320 500 120 140 160 180 220
average 180 260 360 360 536 152 148 168 188 236
2 1 260 320 360 340 500 240 290 350 400 500
2 2 260 260 300 300 450 220 270 350 400 460
2 3 200 230 280 310 450 150 190 250 320 400
average 240 270 313 317 467 203 250 283 373 434
1 1 90 120 140 160 180 60 80 90 90 80
1 2 50 100 110 100 180 50 80 90 90 100
1 3 70 80 60 30 80 60 70 50 50 50
1 4 30 30 40 60 80 40 50 100 160 210
1 5 40 120 100 110 100 120 120 120 180 200
average 70 90 90 92 124 66 80 90 114 128

attraction; the inequality of the magnetic forces at the leading and trailing edges of the poles will lead to the appearance of uncompensated radial and tangential forces. Thus, an increase in the load of the machine is accompanied by an increase in the inequality of the forces applied to the leading and trailing edges of the pole shoes, which is accompanied by an increase in the vibrations of the machine.

References

  1. K. A. Khorkov, V. N. Dmitriev, E. E. Dutlov. Study of the magnetic field in the air gap of a direct-current machine. Izv. TPI, vol. 265, 1973.

Submission history

Study of the Magnetic Field in the Air Gap of a DC Motor Operating Under Load